John Guillory's Differences On The Contributions Of General Education?

Question #1

Clune’s economic argument focuses on the fear many parents and students have on pursuing interests as a degree in college. He argues that, “…that the earnings of humanities Bas were “on par with the social, behavioral, and life sciences” (Clune). Here, he addresses the fear that many people have about choosing lucrative areas of study in college. Many are worried that if they follow their interests in college they will be likely to end up poor. However, that is not the case as Clune states in this quote. This specifically, is a persuasive idea because Clune cites a specific study. The use of statistics from a reliable source strengthens his point. Yet, this point still has its problems as it does not consider each student’s own

He provides context of how a shift in the middle class after WWII caused those who experienced liberal education to be limited to the elite. Purely vocational training, on the other hand, was more easily accessible to the majority. His work outside of this piece in areas of literature, history, sociology and their overlaps, shows that he has his own appreciation for the liberal arts (John Guillory). Harvey Graff’s contributions are like Guillory’s except that his focusses on an earlier time than Guillory. This again provides context for the idea Clunes is discussing. In addition, however, Graff’s contribution provides a name to the model faux interdisciplinarity. This allows the issues Clune addresses to be easily targeted under one name. Graff is also cited to provide further insight into this topic through his idea that understanding is often achieved through engaging in interdisciplinary instruction. Outside of this article, Graff has a book titled Undisciplining Knowledge, which shows that he has taken the time to think about and research this topic, verifying him as a