1. Introduction
If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges on its own home market, it is said to be “dumping” the product. Is this unfair competition? Opinions differ, but many governments take action against dumping in order to defend their domestic industries. The WTO agreement does not pass judgement. Its focus is on how governments can or cannot react to dumping — it disciplines anti-dumping actions, and it is often called the “Anti-Dumping Agreement”.
Among WTO members, AD is the most popular contingent protective measure among others, namely countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard (SG). (Chad P. Bown 2011) From 1995 to 2000, the number of AD cases initiated accounts for 89.1% of the total cases sanctioning by all WTO members. The share of CVD remained as small as 7.1%. The SG was the least frequently used measure with a share of only 3.8% over this period. (Aggarwal 2004 p.1043)
Governments tend to support the use of AD as a trade remedy measure, since AD is more attractive as a tool of ''political-support” safety valve. It has the following advantages:
First, the sense of justice made it easy to convince the public that the "unfair trade practice" of foreign competitors are the real cause of its implementation. It may help avoiding the blame of the public domestic firms for a lacking of competitiveness.
Secondly, even though SG and AD are both aiming at providing protection to domestic industry, compare with SG, AD has many advantages. 1. AD is subject to the fewer stringent conditions. That is to say, the thresholds of implementing AD is much lower than that of the SG. SG is implemented under two conditions: first, if there is a surge of imports; second, the domes...
... middle of paper ...
...rities.
Presentation of false information or failure to provide documents within the deadline may also be punished by a fine. When the number of suppliers, products or transactions is too large, the Ministry may select a sample for the investigation using statistical sampling methods on the basis of the information available at the time of the selection or by choosing those suppliers or products with the largest import volumes.
When Mexico started to file AD on China, Chinese producers failed to respond the request of SE within the time limit in the first several years. China's passive reaction stimulated such actions of Mexican complainants at the beginning years. Therefore, SE uses the "facts available" provided exclusively by the domestic producers to calculate the highest margin of dumping; that is why some antidumping duties reach to more than 1200%.
The role of law reform has been exceedingly significant and effective in protecting the rights of consumers. The amendments and reforms made to the failure of existing laws have certainly increased the protection for consumers, improving access and awareness, however loopholes still exist that detracts from the overall effectiveness of the legal system in protecting consumers. Therefore, indicating that further reforms are required to improve the effectiveness of the legal system.
Additionally, in an effort to establish and standardize fair trade practices in interstate and international commerce, the government enacted laws that were directed toward labor unions and the labor relations process. These laws have either benefited or were detrimental to labor organizations.
With so much focus on the positive elements of free trade, the negative aspects of an open system are often overlooked. However, they do exist, and protectionism is needed. Consequently, safeguards are built into the system. States look out for their own good, whether that is through the use of escape clauses or the choice of the optimal forum for dispute settlement based on the precedent they do or do not want set. This paper argues that protectionism is valuable and inherent in the current system; however, not enough. Powerful states exploit weaker states, and “free trade” exacerbates the problem. I will first discuss why free trade does not work. Then, I will explain how the current system enables the inherent protectionist attitude of states. Finally, I will analyze the fairness of the system.
Like the other virtues, justice is a mean between two extremes. It requires both to know one’s limits and be able to recognize the mean of what is just, which is a measuring, prudence, or the practical wisdom to carry out the action. On the other hand, the excess, which is receiving more than one’s share, and deficiency, which is receiving less than ones’ share, both can be named as injustice. Also, in the virtue of justice, it does not end at the limits of oneself. But it goes beyond to negotiate how an individual stands in relation to the space of the whole. Similarly, the measuring requires an adjustment of a particular justice or injustice, with reference to a vision of the whole of justice. Justice is, then, that puts one outside of oneself with a view to one’s belonging in a community with other people. This does not mean that the significance of the individual is diminished in justice; rather, these are the paths of justice that strengthen the significance that the individual cultivates. Also these paths of justice empower the excellence of virtues in oneself to make the community of which one is part a site of flourishing for oneself and others. However, beyond the general meaning of justice, there are two different kinds of
Investigating a foreign firm of alleged price dumping can be very complex, this is due to many factors to consider, such as, whether the products have the same characteristics or whether they are made in the same “like product” or equal value. This mean, if the Commerce Department does not have the identical product to compare it to, they will utilize another product that has closed resemble to the original product, which could result in a subjective conclusion. In the case of Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States 266 F.3d 1372 (2001), demonstrates how Commerce Department could lead to a complicated matter in determining what the “like product” entails (Schaffer, Agusti, & Dhooge, 2015, p. 299-300).
This…is what I say justice is… the advantage of the established rule…the advantage of the stronger (338e). The above quote summarizes Thrasymachus definition of justice. Thrasymachus hold that justice is the advantage of the stronger, which is to say that justice is just a moral system that has been developed by those who govern in a specific location. In other words, justice is specific to region, and is dependent on who governs.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
...nvincing reforms such as the peer review panels in order to limit the potential biases that are mentioned above. However, these reforms do not remove the flaws within the Commission entirely. Several scholars have criticized its ineffectiveness and confirm how the faults remain in the system. Wills argues that such peer review does not apply to every single case; it only applies to 101 TEFU “where appropriate”, certainty not in cartel cases. Secondly, the commissioners are not prevented from discussion of the matter with the investigators while the case is under adjudication. This criticism is worth to be analyzed in more detail, a final decision of the proceedings are made by the college of commissioners who would receive a proposal from the Competition Commissioner, who would have been briefed by DG Competition officials, such as Chief Competition Economist and
This sort of arrangement not only eliminates hurdles to trade but promote foreign investment as well, not giving room to economies for making use of import tariffs to safeguard their rising industries or their farmers from abundances of inexpensive imports. This trade agreement also contains extra guidelines on investment that poses a possible threat to poor publics' access to public services.
Too many questions have been asked if dumping implies unfair trade practices. Recently, disputes over dumping make it difficult to decide whether or not we should allow this activity to enter our country. Many of us are equally familiar that more foreign imports mean more jobs are being destroyed in American industries. Because of this particular reason, WTO and GATT members have worked together to see if there is a relationship between dumping and unjust trades. In their study, some have discovered that dumping benefits the economy and helps increase competitions among various industries in the U.S. However, there were also some others who took the opposite side by arguing that dumping is an unreasonable practice of trade and may American economy in the future. If dumping really affects trade and costs jobs in the US, then what are the measures needed to prevent this practice and help maintain fair trade in the global economy.
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges on its own home market, it is said to be “dumping” the product. The WTO agreement does not pass judgment. Its focus is on how governments can or cannot react to dumping- it disciplines antidumping actions, and it is often called the “Antidumping Agreement” (The Agreement on Implementation of article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994). Antidumping refers to a legal system under which the government of a country investigates the dumping of imports and take corresponding antidumping measures in accordance with the law.
After the failed International Trade Organization, Rodrik discusses the Bretton Woods Agreement, the transition from the General Agreement on Tariffs and T...
One of the first contemporary definitions of dumping is “price determination and unfair competition between national markets” (Futrell, 2001, p.254). This definition is found in the provisions of the anti-dumping law in the Emergency Tariff Act of 1921 in the United States (United States Tariff Commission, 2014). The legislative aim of the law was to prevent the sale of foreign goods in the markets of the US at prices that were lower than the prices of the same goods within the US market (Futrell, 2001). Current WTO law on dumping and anti-dumping measures is stipulated in Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and in the WTO Agreement on Implement...
International trading has had its delays and road blocks, which has created a number of problems for countries around the world. Countries, fighting with one another to get the better deal, create tariffs and taxes to maximize their profit. This fighting leads to bad relationships with competing countries, and the little producing countries get the short end of this stick. Regulations and organizations have been established to help everyone get the best deal, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), but not everyone wants help, especially from an organization that seems to help only the big countries and those they want to trade with. This paper will be discussing international trading with emphasis on national sovereignty, the World Trade Organization, and how the WTO impacts trading countries.