The Tempest Responsibility Analysis

1948 Words4 Pages

How is the relationship between power and responsibility explored in Shakespeare 's The Tempest and Peircy 's Woman on the edge of time?
The idea of hierachy within all levels of society has been around since the beggining of civilisation with servitude and slavery being the lowest level. Racism features in both The Tempest and Woman on the Edge of time, with the oppression and enslavement of Caliban and the maltreatment of Connie repectively. The Tempest deals covertly with the effect of post-colonialism and suburdination of others to an authority figure whilst Woman on the edge of time portrays the oppression of women at the time, focussing on hispanic minorties in America paired with stigmatism towards mental illness. This essay will look …show more content…

Ariels ' 'duty ' ' to Prospero is arguablly morally binding due to the fact that Prospero released him from Sycorax 's imprisonment in a tree, but Prosepero 's role as a powerful magician indicates that he has power over Ariel. This therefore pushes Ariels obligation to help him into forced servitude. This servant/master dynamic differs from Prospero 's relationship with Caliban as a slave; Prospero treats Ariel better due to there being mutually beneficial bond, albeit with unbalanced benefits. Ariel would be aware of Calibans suffering at the hands of Prospero and owes his ' 'freedom ' ' to him whilst being painfully aware of the repercussions of not doing his bidding, therefore by serving him avoids a similar fate to Caliban 's. By not using physical force to control Ariel, Prosepero maintains his power over him. This adheres to another statement from Rousseaus that 'Force is a physical power; I do not see how its effects could produce morality. To yield to force is an act of necessity, not of will; It is at best an act of prudence. In what sense can it be a moral duty? '. Prosperos promise to eventually free him acts as an incentive to do his bidding although once reminded he lashes back with 'Dost thou forget from what a torment …show more content…

In a system that is racially bias and still largely prejudice and ignorant of the effects of mental illness she is stripped of her identity and treated like an animal. This is extremely comparable to Caliban 's treatment. He too is treated like an animal, due to him being native to the island and being unaccusomed with the European way of life at the time. In comparision to Connie he does not become alienated with his culture and ethnicity, but rather with his freedom, for example he loudly proclaims 'This island 's mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou takest from me. ' but then later on subjugates to a fool: ' I prithee, be my god. '. Connie 's freedom is restricted by her race, her gender, her lack of wealth and her past. She beat her daughter whilst inebriated and very likely depressed, the result being her daughter being taken into care and she being sectioned. Due to her past she now fitted a profile and that was enough to justify removing her freedom, and ultimately, her humanity. At this time any attempts of reasoning with the medical staff were pointless, as it is described: “The authority of the physician is undermined if the patient presumes to make a diagnostic statement.”

Open Document