Many people know about the Romanov Family of Russia, and the mystery of Anastasia Romanov, the youngest daughter of the Czar Nicholas II. Many say that young Anastasia died with the rest of her family, however there are many movies, plays, books, and TV shows that force people to reflect upon the long asked question, Did Anastasia Romanov really survive her family’s massacre? However, their story begins long before the massacre, with the rule of her father Nicolas II. The Romanov Dynasty began in 1613, with Andrey Kobyla. In May of 1896 after the death of Alexander III, his son Nicholas II and his wife Alexandra were crowned czar and czarina of Russia. They soon had five children, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Alexei, and the famous Anastasia. …show more content…
The czar soon retracted these concessions and repeatedly dissolved the Duma, contributing to the growing public support enjoyed by the Bolsheviks and other revolutionary groups.” In 1914 Nicholas led Russia into World War One, the war was very costly and food rations became less and less, and many soldiers were tired and or injured. This caused the hatred for Nicholas to grow. In 1915, Nicholas (II) personally took command of the army and left his wife (the czarina) Alexandra to rule in his place. While the czar was away, Gregory Rasputin replaced all of Nicholas’ ministers and officials. Nicholas was forced to give up the throne to his brother, who turned it down, ending the czarist autocracy in Russia. For many years after, the Romanov family was in hiding, while a civil war broke out all over Russia. “Just after midnight on July 17, Nicholas, Alexandra, their five children, and four family retainers were ordered to dress quickly and go down to the cellar of the house in which they were being held. There, the family and servants were arranged in two rows for a photograph they were told was being taken to quell rumors that they had escaped. Suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned …show more content…
People who believed that Anna was truly an imposter include, Anastasia’s tutor, the czar’s youngest sister, and Alexandra’s (Anastasia’s mother) sister. Nicholas’ sister Olga Alexandrovna stated, "My telling the truth does not help in the least, because the public simply wants to believe the mystery." In 1968 she married John Manahan, and moved to Charlottesville, Virginia where she lived, still claiming to be Anastasia until 1984 when she died due to pneumonia. In 2007 the two missing Romanov bodies were excavated, and identified as Alexei and Anastasia Romanov, proving that Anastasia Romanov did not survive the mass execution of her family. However some people still believed that Anna Anderson was Anastasia, so DNA taken from Anna’s tissue and hair samples confirmed that not only was she not Anastasia, but she was Polish, not Russian or German like the Romanov family
" First World War.com - Primary Documents - Tsar Nicholas II Takes Command of Russian Armies, 5 September 1915. online at Firstworldwar.com. Available at: http://www.firstworldwar.com/source/russia_tsarincommand.htm>. Engel, B., 1997.
Tsar Nicholas II was a family man who put his family before the wellbeing of the country. In the Bloody Sunday scene thousands of people were marching to the Winter Palace to request help and protection from the Tsar because he was supposed to be in St Petersburg. However he was not there, he had gone home to tend to his son because he was ill. This resulted in the massacring of approximately 200 people who meant no harm . After his abdication in a conversation with his son Alexi he tells him that he abdicated for him. He tells Alexi, “I didn't want you to pay for my mistakes.” Whether this was the reason for his abdication or not the movie led the viewers to believe that everything he did was for his family. The leader of a country should make decisions that will be better for the country, not their family. He put the wellbeing of his family before the country which shows inadequate leadership that ultimately led to the collapse of the old reg...
Understanding the role Bolsheviks play in affecting Britain's soldiers and citizens during World War One first requires background information on both Russian interests and Russia's relationship to Germany. Russia entered World War One after Germany declared war against Russia due to an alliance system between Germany and Austria. The Russians had little success in repelling the Germans, illustrated by the disaster at Tannenberg where more than 30,000 Russians soldiers died (Sherow). Germany subsequently made large gains into Russian territories. Tsar Nicholas II had no choice but to abdicate the throne in March 1917, allowing the Bolsheviks to take power (Sherow). It is very important to note that the Germans allowed "prominent Bolsheviks like Lenin and Trotsky" to pass by rail through their country "to start a revolution and knock Russia out of the war" (Simpson). Due to the Bolshevik revolution not completely coming from a democratic mandate from the people, Britain shows extreme suspicion towards Russian motives henceforth.
For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and population under sever economic and social conditions; consequently, during the late 19th century and early 20th century, various movements were staging demonstrations to overthrow the oppressive government. Poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment; in addition, the country was industrially backward compared to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernize, this was to do with the tsars lack of effort for reforms. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine and poor morale could be found in all aspects of Russian life. Furthermore, the tsar committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats.
I can use this source in my research project to defend why Czar Nicholas II is innocent to the abuse of power of the office of Czar.It reveales to me that even thouch Nicholas struggled with being the new Czar he truly did a lot for Russia to improve in learning abilities.Above all else, Nicholas loved Russia first and then his family; He thought the fate of the two was inseparable. No one knew the fault of the Romanov Dynasty better than him. Czar Nicholas sincerely felt his responsibility for the country, He thought that his destiny was within the country he ruled. I think it was really difficult for him but it was the only way to admit his mistakes and to say "sorry" to his people.
The Romanov Empire had reign the Russian Empire for about 300 years before Nicholas II became the monarch. Unfortunately, the new Tsar of Russia was also advised by Konstantin Pobedonostsev, who promoted autocracy, condemned elections, representation and democracy, the jury system, the press, free education, charities, and social reforms; an outdated ideology by the turn of the twentieth century. Although Nicholas II possessed some skills that would have been advantageous as the leader but, overall he was not suitable to be the Tsar of Russia. Even though Czar Nicholas II implemented limited reform that were beneficial for the empire; there were more fiascos during his reign thus lies the collapse of the Romanov Empire on his political skill,
Rasputin’s loyalty to the czar and his family made him “immune” to the attempts of exile from Russia (DISCovering). Aleksey Nickolayevich was a hemophiliac (Rasputin). On one certain occasion, doctors were called in to check on the young heir. After nothing seemed to help, “Grigory Rasputin, who was reported to have miraculous powers of faith healing, was brought to Alexandra” (Massie 259). Rasputin didn’t cure Aleksey of hemophilia, but his ability to control the symptoms was “indisputable” (Fuhrmann 26). “In December 1916, a group of conservative aristocrats laced Rasputin’s wine with potassium cyanide at a soiree in the Yousoupov Palace” (DISCovering). The poison wasn’t strong enough to kill Rasputin. He was shot once, “lurched” at his attackers and they shot him again (DISCovering).
Demands for changes in the government finally resulted. in the abdication of Nicholas II and his son on March 15. Over three centuries of Romanov rule are at an end. In the summer of 1918, the Russian royal family was imprisoned in
Czar Nicholas’ poor leadership forced him to abdicate and caused the Bolshevik takeover. One of the reasons I say that is because of the way he handled “Bloody Sunday”. “Bloody Sunday” was when troops killed over a thousand people in a peaceful worker assembly. After “Bloody Sunday”, workers all over Russia went on strike, and peasants caused uprisings that were suppressed by Nicholas II’s troops causing tensions to increase. Another reason was his disastrous involvement in World War I. In the beginning of the war, Russia’s armies did not do well. To fix this, Nicholas became the commander. Now under his command, their continued failure reflected the Czar himself, further decreasing his popularity. Lastly, civil unrest grew as food riots, chronic food shortages, and labor strikes continued to proceed. This eventually erupted into open revolt, and Czar Nicholas had no choice but to abdicate. Soon after, the new government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin.
Nikolai is the former Tsar of the Russian Empire, and the caring father of the Romanov family. Alekesandra Fyoforovna is the calm mother of the Romanov family, and is wary of anything that happens to her son. Alekesei is the lively and only Romanov son, and suffers from Hemophilia, being able to die from a bleeding episode from any minor bruise. Anastasiya is the mischievous youngest daughter of the Romanov family, who Leonka said that if any of the Romanovs were to escape, it would be her. Komendant Aydeyev is the “Bolshevik pig” ; fat, greasy, disrespectful, old man who looks over the Ipatiev house and who Nikolai
The topic of this investigation is to analyze to what extent did the personal influence of Grigori Rasputin lead to the fall of the Russian Empire. The analysis will investigate the relationship of Rasputin to those in positions of power, starting from the time when Rasputin first treated Alexei to the last days of the Romanov Dynasty. Statements from those acquainted with Rasputin and historical analyses of Rasputin’s life will be analyzed to elucidate the extent of Rasputin’s influence.
In this instance Nicholas did not understand the magnitude of his people's, more specifically the soldiers suffering while at war with Austria and Germany. Often times the war minister, Vladimir Sukhomlinov, misinformed Nicholas regarding the conditions of soldiers leaving the Russian army without food, clothing and weapons. Through this miscommunication, it left not merely the soldiers without defense, but the country defenseless along with them. As a result, “By the following spring, the shortage had grown so severe that many soldiers charged into battle without guns. Instead, commanders told them to pick up their weapons from the men killed in front lines. At the same time, soldiers were limited to firing just ten shots a day. Sometimes they were even forbidden to return enemy fire” (134). This was just one piece of the puzzle that led to the crumble of the Russian autocracy. Especially considering the fact that everyone could see their efforts for winning the war were dissipating all except for one, “. . . everyone in the tsar’s government knew it… everyone, that is, except Nicholas himself” (135). As shown in this instance, basic misconceptions can begin a ripple effect that has the power to put a country in
The trial was canceled due to the conspirators being members of the aristocracy, so they were never convicted and instead were exiled. This did not sit well with the peasants, who were unhappy with their monarch after disastrous military exploits that costs 3.3 million Russian lives. Three months after Rasputin’s death, Tsar of Russia, Nicholas II were forced to step down from their thrown within a year. Nicholas II, Nicholas’ wife, son and four daughters were murdered along with the family’s chef and the lady-in-waiting.
During the year of the Tercentenary in 1913, the Romanov family attended a number of celebrations. On 23 February, Olga and Tatiana attended their first major public ball at the Assembly of Nobles. Because of this, the discussion of the succession of the Russian throne was brought forth. In secret, Mikhail, Nicholas’s brother, married his mistress Natalya Wulfert who was a commoner. He was immediately banished, and his assets were frozen because he would not divorce her or renounce his right to the throne. Afterwards Nicholas, without the approval of the Duma, announced that Olga would act as regent during Alexey’s minority until he came of age if anything would happen to Nicholas.
The government and reform; the actual character of Nicholas II hindered his time in office, for example his outlooks on situations meant he did not trust a lot of his advisors, he was also seen to have been very lazy with respects to making decisions, other observations included him being, weak, timid and lacked guts. This all adds up to a very weak leader that is vulnerable to opposition, due to his tunnel vision and un-ability to see the main needs of the country. The duma was another challenge to the tsar; after the 1905 revolution the tsar had set up an elected body called the duma, this was a way of showing the public that he could be open minded in that delegating decisions to other people, looking back in hindsight this would also be seen as a challenge to the tsar as he never gave the duma any real power, and were easily dissolved, this meant that people were further angered and he was receiving opposition from all sides, it did however hold off opposition for a small period of time in order for the tsar to retain his power. Other individuals had an influence to the challenges facing the tsar, Nicholas had brought some new people in to try and conquer some problems, these included Rasputin who he had originally appointed to become saviour of family, he managed to influence the tsar in many of his decisions, this inevitably caused there to be conflict as the he was relying on Rasputin to relay details of the state of the country, these were not accurate which meant that tsar could not act upon opposition. Other people did help the tsar for example stolypin and his reforms.