The Right To Life, Happiness, And The Pursuit Of Happiness

2027 Words5 Pages

Among the elaborate list of rights unalienable to any and all American citizens, are the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The last of these, the pursuit of happiness, is perhaps the most vague and the most commonly debated right historically. Above all, the main factor of this right that makes it so highly debated among people is its absolute ambiguity. What one person’s right to the pursuit of happiness might seem deplorable to another, and therefore contradicts what another would see as a pursuit of happiness. How then can any court rule against this unalienable right and deem somebody’s pursuit of happiness as unconstitutional? Among a vast majority of the earth’s population, a highly considered happiness is the right to freely listen to music.
Over the course of history, music has been considered a great American past time, and is arguably one of the greatest joys in life. John Denver, American singer/songwriter once said that,
Music does bring people together. It allows us to experience the same emotions. People everywhere are the same in heart and spirit. No matter what language we speak, what color we are, the form of our politics or the expression of our love and our faith, music proves we are the same. (Tobier, 1991)
Because of feeling and beliefs evident in this statement and the widespread agreement that the love and passion for music falls under the umbrella of happiness, would sharing music with others not constitute as the pursuit of happiness? In 1999, an 18 year old created Napster, an online music sharing website that would shake the foundation of the music industry forever, and completely rewrite what online file-sharing would mean. Another similar case happened in 2006 when the Recording I...

... middle of paper ...

...he intellectual property of another. Even though Napster helped create what would become a wildly successful market of online music sales, it also served as the catalyst that would rewrite American copyright laws indefinitely.
Napster completely shut down in 2001 to comply with court orders and rulings. Later, in September, Napster tried re-opening but instead of offering its once free services, attempted to convert their services to a subscription type system. Napster is still currently in operation, but now has a $9.99 monthly membership charge that returns profits to recording companies and artists and now owned by Best Buy. So even though Shawn Fanning was not able to achieve his initial mission of bringing the world music, free of charge, he did, however, make it easier for people to globally share music. Of course, as long as they pay 99¢ for every download.

Open Document