The Reasons Behind Police's Inability To Catch Jack The Ripper

983 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper

The Reasons Behind Police's Inability To Catch Jack The Ripper

Jack The Ripper was never caught, and his identity remains a mystery

to this day. The police were unable to catch Jack The Ripper and solve

the mystery of the Whit Chapel murders because of several reasons.

The first reason is the police themselves. In London, there were two

police forces. The Metropolitan police and the City Of London police.

The murders took place in both of the jurisdictions. The police forces

each had separate investigations going on and they did not share

evidence or information with each other. This hampered their

investigations because a vital clue being held by one police force may

have linked in with evidence being held by the other police force.

This prevented either police force from solving the mystery.

The technology at the time stopped the police from gathering

sufficient evidence from the crime scene. The police could not take

fingerprints, blood samples, DNA and could not analyse it. They were

unable to differ between human and animal blood. This meant that all

the police could do was search the crime scene for any evidence that

could be seen with the naked eye. No magnifying equipment was

available to search for tiny clues. Clues were found at the crime

scene. A bloody cloth was found at one of the victims' body, however

this was useless to the police, as they could not analyse the blood on

the cloth that could have made that catching the killer was possible.

The note written on the wall could not have been fingerprinted for

clues because this technology was not available. This was the same as

the letters that were sent to the police. ...

... middle of paper ...

... in a

terrible state. This meant that the post mortems were difficult and

the coroners were unable to get any clues from the corpses. No one

actually saw Jack The Ripper Kill. Many different descriptions were

given on the killer but no one actually saw him commit murder. This

meant that the police had no idea of where and when he killed because

he could have moved the bodies.

I believe that the most important reason why Jack The Ripper was never

caught was because of the police. Their tactics were not suitable for

catching a serial killer, as they had never experienced one before.

Also, the limited technology made it difficult for the police to

gather any evidence or clues from the crime scene.

Because of this main reason, and other reasons Jack The Ripper escaped

being caught and remains a mystery to this day.

Show More
Related

  • Washburn V. State

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    We were presented with many facts that all pointed to Mr. Washburn as the murder. In the house all of the entrances were thoroughly inspected by authorities, and they found no sign of ransacking. “[They] examined all the locking mechanisms, all the doors and windows. In [their] opinion there was no evidence of any forced entry” (P.81). When police looked for fingerprints, “They were all of the Washburn family and the maid” (P.81). There was no trace of an outside party; somebody usually in the Washburn house committed the murder. While in the living room, an officer found a drop of blood. The evidence technician was called the next night to run some tests. “He sprayed the living room carpet with luminol. It is a luminous spray, and when it comes in contact with blood it illuminates” (P.82). To both men’s surprise the whole living room was illuminating. After spraying further the men found a trail from the living room through the kitchen to the garage. In the closet the men found a wet mop, which was tested for blood and also came back positive. Somebody tried to clean his or her bloody mess, and try to save himself. The physical evidence proves the killer was somebody who was familiar to the Washburn household.

    Read More

  • Investigating Why the Police Were Unable to Catch Jack the Ripper

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    Investigating Why the Police Were Unable to Catch Jack the Ripper I believe the most important reason why Jack the Ripper was so hard to catch was because of the lack of evidence. In those days they did not have as advanced technology as we have today for instance, we have forensics where we can tell from a strand of hair who that hair belongs to. In those days they were only just learning the significance of footprints to catching a villain. Another part to this is that Jack the Ripper was so random towards who he killed the police could not find a link between the murders except that they were all prostitutes, which did not really help, although prostitute murders were not terribly uncommon. The press coverage to the case didn’t help much as they had forced the police to investigate ‘Leather Apron’ and this wasted a significant amount of the police time which, if spent properly, may have allowed them to uncover more information needed to catch the Ripper.

    Read More

  • Exoneration of Ron Keine: A Death Row Narrative

    848 Words  | 2 Pages

    They had an alibi witness, a gas receipt, a ticket on the day of the murder. A police officer who would not come unless the judge subpoena him and the judge of course refused and would not pay the $650 to summon him. There were also two jailhouse snitches who lied about their testimony. The police misconduct was used in how they charged these individuals originally and how they have been accused initially with robbery, which later turned into murder. The police created the story and intimidated an eye witness who refused to testify and threatened to charge her with the murder if she refused. The attorneys told a moving tale and Ron Keine and company ended up being convicted. This case was before DNA testing but what exonerated these individuals was the actual murder confessing to the crimes. The entire case seemed like a fluke and malicious attack on these people. A guy in Carolina, confessed to all charges and had an epiphany and told the police where the weapon was located and how everything happened and how he dragged the body. He had to fight to get the police to accept his confession because the police were acting as if they already had their

    Read More

  • Elizabeth Short - The Black Dahlia

    1555 Words  | 4 Pages

    Two detectives were assigned to the case: Harry Hanson and Finis Brown. [2] When they and the police arrived at the crime scene, it was already swarming with people, gawkers and reporters. The entire situation was out of hand and crowded, everyone trampling all over any hopes for good evidence. [2] One thing they did report finding was a nearby cement block with watery blood on it, tire tracks and a heel print on the ground. There was dew under the body so they knew it had been set there just after 2 a.m. when temperatures dropped to 38 degrees.

    Read More

  • Jack the Ripper

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ed dead in the Thames River (Schachner). A jury ruled his death a suicide by drowning. Investigators of the case believe that Druitt could have been Jack the Ripper, because around the same timeframe he committed suicide; the murders stopped (Jones). John Douglas noted that serial killers do not suddenly cease their urge to kill (Anderson 69). That would logically explain why there were no more murders were committed.

    Read More

  • Eyewitness Error Essay

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    The officers tampered with evidence and made a false discovery that he was the person and that is how he was convicted (Innocent Project N.D.). Many forensic methods have been implemented in research when looking for evidence, but the methods that are not scientific and have little or nothing to do with science. The result of false evidence by other means leads to false testimony by a forensic analyst. Another issue with forensic errors is that it is a challenge to find a defense expert (Giannelli, 2011).

    Read More

  • Jack the Ripper

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jack the Ripper was an infamous serial killer who killed at least five London female prostitutes in 1888. Never captured, his identity is one of English's most famous unsolved mysteries. Today, Jack the Ripper is one of the most, if not the most, famous serial killer ever. There are many theories on who Jack the Ripper is, and why he killed, but none of these theories were ever proven. Jack the Ripper is simply a lone assassin who “officially” killed four prostitutes and got away without ever being caught and convicted of his crimes.

    Read More

  • Jack The Ripper

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    so that this informs us that the killer may not have had a motive, but

    Read More

  • Compare The Speckled Band, The Red Headed League and Silver Blaze as Examples of Detective Fiction

    1436 Words  | 3 Pages

    A detective is vital in an effective detective story because arguably there would not be a story and a detective to restore law and order and the villain/criminal would not be caught. Whereas it there was a detective it would have been a different story. A typical detective should be smart, observant, manipulative, and analytic and should have a good sense of justice. Sherlock Holmes has all of these elements to fight crime. Sherlock Holmes has the typical elements as a normal detective in classical detective fiction for example he is observant “Sherlock Holmes’s quick ...

    Read More

  • Jonbenet Ramsey Murder Case

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    If the killer was one of the family members there motive would have been because of their rage. It was said that Patsey was getting mad at Jonbenet for wetting the bed almost every night. She could have snapped and accidently hit her with an object she found near her. She told there gardener that anyone can get away with murder in this country right now because at the time OJ Simpson was found innocent. But there is also a motive for John Ramsey. When the police arrived at the house it was reported that he was making a phone call and saying that he is wanting to leave the area. Why would John want to leave the area if his daughter just died? After that John left for about an hour and no one knows where he went expect him. When he came back he was acting very suspicious. But it could have been an intruder as well that killed Jonbenet. The window in the basement was smashed and they found scruff marks on the wall. There was also a boot print that was found in the crime scene and it didn't match anyones shoe in the house. Eventually the police ruled out the immediate family because of the DNA. The police suspected other people too like John Mark Karr or Michael Helgoth. Karr confessed to strangling to in detail. But they ruled him out because of the DNA didn't match and she didn't die of strangulation. Helgoth also confessed to murdering her on tape. The boot print that the police found was very similar the his shoes that he was wearing. But they ruled him out because of DNA and Michael committed

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.

    Read More

  • Summary Of John Grisham's The Pelican Brief

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some cases cannot be solved without this evidence. “Physical evidence refers to any item that comes from a nonliving origin, such as fingerprints, tire marks, footprints, fibers, paint, and building materials” (“PE”). There is also another group called biological evidence. Biological evidence branches from a living thing, including bloodstains and DNA. Forensic scientists place their evidence into categories including these. “Forensic science is the use of scientific principles and methods to analyze material connected with a crime” (Funkhouser). When a crime is committed, law enforcement officers tape off the scene as quickly as possible (Funkhouser). They then search the area for evidence (Funkhouser). Forensic scientists rarely actually go to the crime scene (Funkhouser). Once all the evidence is gathered from the site, it is then cautiously transported to the crime lab to be analyzed (Funkhouser). Everything about a crime scene is taken very seriously. It is a very tedious process, which takes patience and

    Read More

  • Crime Scene Investigation

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime Scene Investigation For my assignment, I will be looking into the case of James Bulger, aged 2 years old, who was kidnapped and murdered by John Venables and Robert Thompson on February 12th 1993. Through evidence found at the crime scene and testimonial statements, the police saw that the two boys, ages 11, abducted James from Bootle Strand Shopping Center, Liverpool. They took him on a long, aimless walk where they brutally attacked him and left him for dead. In my assignment I will show how work done by the police, forensic scientists and Investigators helped to convict Jon and Robert.

    Read More

  • Blood Spatter Analysis

    598 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many of us enjoy watching crime scene investigation shows, but in the criminal justice system forensic investigation is an essential field that requires upright observations and a prodigious interpretation. Under forensics, it is difficult to blame someone without scientific data. For that reason, Larry K. Gaines author of the textbook Criminal Justice in Action explains the importance of Blood Spatter Analysis. Specialist can learn a great deal about violent crime by examining where blood landed at the scene, the size and consistency of drops, and the pattern of blood spatter (Gaines, 2011). Consequently, an article of the Blood Spatter Analysis will be used to explain the research methodology the author uses to proceed certain investigations.

    Read More

  • Essay On Forensic Investigation

    1363 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many steps that have to be taken when leading a criminal investigation and investigating a crime scene. Firstly, detectives have to try and figure out why and how a crime was committed. They examine a crime scene looking for information or clues such as fingerprints, weapons, and DNA. They investigate the victims’ history to define why someone would want to harm them. After they have formed a hypothesis, they try to find proof that somebody committed a crime so that they can arrest the suspects. They look at both the cause and the actual evidence of the crime and try to see if their hypothesis makes sense. The suspects then enter the criminal justice system where they are tried using the evidence collected at the crime scene.

    Read More

More about The Reasons Behind Police's Inability To Catch Jack The Ripper

Open Document