Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jack the Ripper and why he was never caught
Write an essay about jack the ripper
Topics on jack the ripper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Jack the Ripper and why he was never caught
Jack The Ripper In August 1888, the first of a series of murders was committed by a killer who became known as Jack the Ripper. To this day the identity of the killer remains a mystery. Five women were brutally killed in the East End of London, by a maniac who appeared to kill without warning and with no remorse. 1)What can you learn from Source A? Source A tells us that the two murders were aimed directly at the poorest people in East End at the time, and usually because of the poverty at that time, the women had to revert to prostitution so this tells us that the murderer had a great dislike for poor people or mainly prostitutes, but there was no clear motive for him to do it. It also tells us that these two murders had been done with an extra amount of effort, which later becomes his signature way of murdering, so that this informs us that the killer may not have had a motive, but he knew what he was doing, so he wasn't totally insane. 2)Does Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B? Sources B and C strongly support each other, while source A differs a little. Source B is the Coroner's report on the death of Polly Nicholls. In this, it says "No unskilled person could have known where to find the organs, or to have recognized them when they were found. No mere slaughterer of animals could have carried out these operations" and in Source C the report describes how Elizabeth Stride was killed and it shows that is was done in a professional way, taking care in all the way s that she was laid out to be found and the slice across the throat "cutting the windpipe completely in two" They agree with each other becau... ... middle of paper ... ...them on wild goose chase. The detective methods were also slowly evolving, so no fingerprints, DNA tests or anything could be used as they were all in the early stages of their development. There were also differences in opinion. For example Mary Kelly- Dr. Bond though her time of death was between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM, and Dr. Phillips thought that is was between 5:00 AM and 6:00AM. This didn't help the police with the evidence of the witnesses either. The primitive ways of the police and the fact that the Metropolitan Police didn't get along with the City of London police, they were un-cooperative so this slowed down things even further. When the first victim was killed, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police was out of the country, so the officers were left to figure things out for themselves whit no guidance.
concludes that it’s possible the murderer could have killed Bob and then put on his
This requires the prosecutor to contemplate and analyze the thought process and the psychological state of the person during the time of the crime. The conclusions of the motivation behind the accused actions is drawn from the evidence that is collected from the case. It also is a term used to refer to the removal of the stigma between murder and punishment, and the moral character of the accused.
This was the only theory that could make sense to me when considering all the suspects,
While reading the case about Mr.Hossack 's murder i saw the wife, Mrs.Hossack, as innocent at first. The children all claimed that the two did not argue for over a year, so why would she kill him now verses a year ago? When the youngest child, Ivan Hossack, came to the stand and "told his story in a straight, unhesitating manner" it made it easier for me to believe in Mrs. Hossack 's innocence. The child even said that he saw his mother aiding his father when he called out for help. If she had been the one to swing the axe, why would she help him and risk getting in trouble? Most importantly, if he was conscious and talking, why wouldn 't he say who to murderer was? He could have easily identified his wife in the dark after being married for over twenty years, and yet he didn 't identify who had tried to kill him. Dr. Dean first stated that the axe did not hit the speech portion of the brain, so he could have been conscious and yelling out for his wife. Dean later stated that the fatal blow from the axe would have left Mr.Hossack unconscious. The murder weapon had blood on in and apparent hairs stuck to one side; "Prof. John L. Tilton of Simpson college... was unable to say definitely that the hair had been
The town of Halifax in West Yorkshire had never experienced such a manhunt in it’s history (Glover 3). During a short, but long lasting in feeling, time period in late November through early December in the year 1938, the town of Halifax underwent a period of mass hysteria. A mysterious “slasher” hid in the shadows and lunged out with a razor blade at people who passed by (Halifax Slasher).
Jack Merridew is the devil-like figure in the story, Lord of the Flies. Jack is wicked in nature having no feelings for any living creature. His appearance and behavior intimidates the others from their first encounter. The leading savage, Jack leans more towards hunting and killing and is the main reason behind the splitting of the boys. It has been said that Jack represents the evilness of human nature; but in the end, Jack is almost a hero. With his totalitarian leadership, he was able to organize the group of boys into a useful and productive society
under the knife in order to perfect something she considers a flaw, risking death. While
...hen he was asked a series of questions about the murder he had no opinion or a reasonable answer to why exactly he had killed the man.
Also what is missing from the source is a date, so we do not know how
was left of the murderer, so in a way the police were not too blame,
The story of Jack London's life really is one of rags to riches. He was born in San Francisco on January 12, 1876 as John Griffith Chaney. I'd like to take you through the story of his life and examine a few of his significant literary works along the way.
At the beginning of the third chapter in Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew is out hunting for a pig to eat. This phrase and the surrounding paragraphs show some crucial characterization of the future savage chief, and describe him as “dog-like”(48), naked besides weapons and fraying shorts, and his eyes appear to be“...bolting and nearly mad”(48). Jack is tensed, frustrated, and searching for something to kill. The word still typically does not have a negative denotation, but the zeugma at play in this circumstance modifies it in its meaning relating to Jack, or he. The framework of the forest in this chapter is a more commonplace way to imagine the verb still. The air is warm, and the thick trees are all around the character at hand. The two
The researchers concluded that while most of the defendants enjoyed telling their story the researchers could not pinpoint the reason behind the killings. However, the similarities of the cases allowed the researchers to evaluate each case and determine what may be a common factor in a serial killers mind.
motive to kill an old man because of the look of his eye. We know that
Why is Jack a bully to every body. Jack always being mean to me like hitting, pushing, throwing, all day at school. I tell the school principal and the teachers about it. They call his parents and his parents came to the school. When the parents come to the school because Jack need to be nice. Jack's parents was mad at Jack so they make Jack to be nice. Now, it you do tell an adult, but the bully keeps on doing it to you, and now he or she bullies other kids as well, that's when you tell your parents. Then your parents will go to the principal. Maybe he or she will call the bully's parents. What if the principal talked with the parents, and the bully keeps on bothering you like crazy, you have to be very strong, and have the courage to stand