The Radicalism Of The American Revolution Gordon S. Wood Summary

analytical Essay

1214 words

Gordon S. Wood, in The Radicalism of the American Revolution, discusses what it means to be truly revolutionary. In this work, Wood shares his thoughts on the Revolutionary War and whether or not it was a movement radical enough to be considered an honest revolution. Wood discusses the reasoning behind the views of those in favor of the war being considered radical, as well as the views of those who believe the American Revolution to be unfortunately misnamed. He claims that “the Revolution was the most radical and most far- reaching event in American history.” Wood’s work is a valuable source for those studying the revolution because it redefines what it means to be radical, but the piece is also limited by the lack of primary information …show more content…

The education of an author on their topic is the biggest contributor to their reliability; having enough prior knowledge and background information on a subject is crucial when providing a historical analysis. An author’s personal background is of great importance as well, because their personal heritage and beliefs may lead to bias and misrepresentation of information, which removes all credibility of them and/or their work as source. Partiality, favoritism, and/or prejudice towards a specific demographic can create a blurred line between what is fact and what is opinion, which in turn can allow for personal assessments to be presented as arguments and facts even though they have been influenced to a great extent by prior thoughts and opinions. In Gordon S. Wood’s The Radicalism of the American Revolution, a new, postmodern take on what the word ‘radicalism’ really means. He focuses on not only the political and social effects of the American Revolution, but also on its lasting contributions to American society. Wood uses a fresh- but still knowledgeable- point of view while making his claims, and uses examples to support these claims. The biggest weakness of the source is that it is a secondary source that was created over two decades after the American Revolution ended, creating a lack of firsthand primary knowledge given in the

In this essay, the author

Analyzes how radicalism is measured by the amount of social capital.
Analyzes wood's argument that the american revolution completely altered the society and culture of america.
Analyzes wood's postmodernist views on radicalism in the radicalism of the american revolution, which sheds a new light on how the revolution is to be viewed and compared to other revolutions.

Analyzes how radicalism is measured by the amount of social capital.
Analyzes wood's argument that the american revolution completely altered the society and culture of america.
Analyzes wood's postmodernist views on radicalism in the radicalism of the american revolution, which sheds a new light on how the revolution is to be viewed and compared to other revolutions.
Explains that wood's the radicalism of the american revolution has a few limitations. he did not live through or witness the events that he is describing.
Analyzes how gordon s. wood's the radicalism of the american revolution redefines what it means to be revolutionary.
Analyzes wood's third claim that the word 'radicalism' has a meaning that varies depending on the circumstances in which it is being discussed.
Analyzes how gordon s. wood's the radicalism of the american revolution is a postmodern take on what the word 'radicalalism' really means.

Click here to unlock this and over one million essays

Continue Reading Check Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!

The Arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers Over the Revolutionary War
analytical essay
The Revolutionary War was one of America’s earliest battles and one of many. Although, many came to America to gain independence from Great Britain many still had loyalty for the King and their laws. Others believed that America needs to be separated from Great Britain and control their own fate and government. I will analyze the arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers. Should America be sustained by Great Britain or find their own passage?
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the arguments of thomas paine and james chalmers. should america be sustained by great britain or find their own passage?
- Opines that america is deemed to be the safe haven for all those who are escaping persecution in their country for religious rights and personal freedom.
- Analyzes how thomas paine wrote the common sense, in which he wrote about america's separation and independence from great britain. he explained that people migrated to america to escape the king and his laws.
- Analyzes the arguments of thomas paine and james chalmers. should america be sustained by great britain or find their own passage?
- Opines that america is deemed to be the safe haven for all those who are escaping persecution in their country for religious rights and personal freedom.
- Analyzes how thomas paine wrote the common sense, in which he wrote about america's separation and independence from great britain. he explained that people migrated to america to escape the king and his laws.
- Analyzes how paine's argument is patriotic, inspiring, uplifting and gives hope with guidance and solutions that the alternative is better than standing with great britain.
- Analyzes the flip side of paine's argument, james chalmers plain truth, which plays on the fears that without britain’s help, america will falter and be overran by criminals.
- Analyzes how chalmers' argument is a steady reminder of the debt owed to britain by the colonies.
- Analyzes how chalmers' rhetoric to common sense seemed to be filled with insults to patriotism and to the words of paine. his argument is unorganized, weak, and muted by his loyalty and bias to britain.
- Opines that thomas paine's excerpt is the most convincing argument. common sense is common sense, his writing affirmed that separation will be beneficial.
- Concludes that without struggle and sacrifice, this country would not have gained independence and prove that united we stand and divide we fall.
735 words
Read More
Radical Changes During The American Revolution
analytical essay
The American Revolution caused a drastic amount of change. While this big thing was going on there were many people that had been included. The British and the 13 colonies went to war against each other so that 13 colonies could try and win over their freedom. Abigail Adams sent a letter to her husband to try and convince the writers to include women's equal rights. There were many hopes that people had while the American Revolution was present in the 1770’s to the early 1780’s. How much change did the American Revolution cause? The American Revolution radically changed three areas of life; social, political, and economics.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the american revolution radically changed three areas of life: social, political, and economics.
- Explains that the american revolution caused radical changes in british territory, including a radical change in women's rights, and in the six nations.
- Explains that the american revolution had radically effected three major areas of life; socially, politically, and economically. women gained more rights than before the revolution, indians were not treated like people with their rights and britain gained a bit more land.
- Analyzes how the american revolution radically changed three areas of life: social, political, and economics.
- Explains that the american revolution caused radical changes in british territory, including a radical change in women's rights, and in the six nations.
- Explains that the american revolution had radically effected three major areas of life; socially, politically, and economically. women gained more rights than before the revolution, indians were not treated like people with their rights and britain gained a bit more land.
436 words
Read More
Radicalism Gary B Nash Summary
analytical essay
Gary B. Nash argues that the American Revolution portrayed “radicalism” in the sense on how the American colonies and its protesters wanted to accommodate their own government. Generally what Gary B. Nash is trying to inform the reader is to discuss the different conditions made by the real people who were actually fighting for their freedom. In his argument he makes it clear that throughout the revolution people showed “radicalism” in the result of extreme riots against the Stamp Act merchants, but as well against the British policies that were implemented. He discusses the urgency of the Americans when it came to declaring their issues against the British on how many slaves became militants and went up against their masters in the fight for a proclamation to free themselves from slavery. But he slowly emerges into the argument on how colonists felt under the
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gary b. nash argues that the american revolution portrayed "radicalism" in the sense of how the americans and its protesters wanted to accommodate their own government.
- Analyzes how "radicalism" shows how a mob from the radical-lower class punished merchants that sold stamps, and punished them horrifically until they agreed upon radical's point of view.
- Analyzes how a mob forced merchants to sign papers regarding their "non-importation agreements" to promise to never be loyal to the british power.
- Analyzes how gary b. nash argues that the american revolution portrayed "radicalism" in the sense of how the americans and its protesters wanted to accommodate their own government.
- Analyzes how "radicalism" shows how a mob from the radical-lower class punished merchants that sold stamps, and punished them horrifically until they agreed upon radical's point of view.
- Analyzes how a mob forced merchants to sign papers regarding their "non-importation agreements" to promise to never be loyal to the british power.
- Analyzes how gary b. nash's argument regarding how the american revolution portrayed "radicalism" has been supported from the previous pieces of evidence.
723 words
Read More
Analysis Of The American Revolution: A History By Gordon Wood
analytical essay
When one explains his or her ingenious yet, enterprising interpretation, one views the nature of history from a single standpoint: motivation. In The American Revolution: A History, Gordon Wood, the author, explains the complexities and motivations of the people who partook in the American Revolution, and he shows the significance of numerous themes, that emerge during the American Revolution, such as democracy, discontent, tyranny, and independence. Wood’s interpretation, throughout his literary work, shows that the true nature of the American Revolution leads to the development of United State’s current government: a federal republic. Wood, the author, views the treatment of the American Revolution in the early twentieth century as scholastic yet, innovative and views the American Revolution’s true nature as
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes gordon wood's interpretation of the american revolution: a history, which explains the complexities and motivations of the people who partook in it.
- Analyzes how wood views the american revolution in the early twentieth century as scholastic yet innovative.
- Analyzes how wood views the american revolution as an approach toward gaining independence from king george's tyrannical government.
- Analyzes gordon wood's interpretation of the american revolution: a history, which explains the complexities and motivations of the people who partook in it.
- Analyzes how wood views the american revolution in the early twentieth century as scholastic yet innovative.
- Analyzes how wood views the american revolution as an approach toward gaining independence from king george's tyrannical government.
- Analyzes how wood portrays anti-conformity, christian based motivations, and federalism to support his thesis.
749 words
Read More
How Revolutionary Was The Revolutionary War?
analytical essay
As proclaimed in the “Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms,” we agreed that the British government had left the people with only two options, “unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers or resistance by force.” Thus, in the early months of the dreadfully long year of 1775, we began our resistance. As the war progressed, the Americans, the underdogs, shockingly began winning battles against the greatly superior mother country of England. Actually, as seen in the battle of Bunker Hill, not only were they winning, they were annihilating hundreds of their resilient opponents. Countless questions arose before and during the War of Independence. Problems like: social equality, slavery, women’s rights, and the struggle of land claims against Native Americans were suddenly being presented in new and influencing ways to our pristine leaders. Some historians believe that while the Revolutionary War was crucial for our independence, these causes were not affected; thus, the war was not truly a revolution. Still, being specified in the Background Essay, several see the war as more radical, claiming it produced major changes above and beyond our independence.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the british government had left the people with only two options: unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers or resistance by force.
- Explains that the revolution helped the americans conquer the problem of "home rule", but now faced the question of who should rule at home.
- Explains that the social boundary lines were erased, obliterated by the circumstances of war. poor workers fought alongside wealthy landowners, directly and indirectly, finding common ground in the strive for liberty.
- Explains that the british government had left the people with only two options: unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers or resistance by force.
- Explains that the revolution helped the americans conquer the problem of "home rule", but now faced the question of who should rule at home.
- Explains that the social boundary lines were erased, obliterated by the circumstances of war. poor workers fought alongside wealthy landowners, directly and indirectly, finding common ground in the strive for liberty.
- Analyzes how the war had a limited but profound significance. liberty and slavery, being contradictory to each other, were understandably incompatible. slavery became abolished in states where there had never been many slaves.
- Explains that the long revolutionary war had a significant effect on american women. many women became impoverished and poor due to the loss of their men.
- Opines that the native americans gained the least from the revolution. while the tribes at first remained neutral in the conflict, both sides greatly desired their support.
- Analyzes how the revolutionary war influenced the ideals of slavery being unmoral, but it did not abolish it. it brought about great changes for our developing nation, such as liberty, indispensable allies, and the creation of new governments.
910 words
Read More
Use of Espionage During the American Revolution
analytical essay
“If we measure the radicalism of revolutions by the degree of social misery or economic deprivation suffered, or by the number of people killed or manor houses burned, then this conventional emphasis on the conservatism of the American Revolution becomes true enough. B...
In this essay, the author
- Opines that it is a matter of importance to prevent the tory spies from obtaining intelligence of our situation.
- Argues that the use of espionage during the american revolution and the consequences that it brought developed a distinct american identity by analyzing the societal benefit it played in the colonies.
- Analyzes how the revolutionary war has been seen as a fundamental period into american history. gordon s.wood sees the revolution in social terms.
- Opines that it is a matter of importance to prevent the tory spies from obtaining intelligence of our situation.
- Argues that the use of espionage during the american revolution and the consequences that it brought developed a distinct american identity by analyzing the societal benefit it played in the colonies.
- Analyzes how the revolutionary war has been seen as a fundamental period into american history. gordon s.wood sees the revolution in social terms.
- Argues that if we measure the radicalism of revolutions by the degree of social misery or economic deprivation suffered, or the number of people killed or manor houses burned, then the american revolution was not conservative at all.
- Analyzes how the attitude of the colonists functions as a barometer for the social changes that ensued during the revolution.
- Opines that the idea of a spy and espionage was less favorable than we are led to believe in the eighteenth century.
- Explains that espionage played a role on both sides, but it was more so an display of the american patriots. the colonists separated themselves from their old british identity, and the english idea of spying and treason were disgraceful acts.
- Analyzes how bernard bailyn's the ideological origins of the american revolution argues that the concept of liberty was central to understanding the movement that would come to follow.
- Explains that michael sulick claims that espionage could have started the war. thomas gage received a report from one of their scouts that colonists were hiding weapons for fear of the british coming to seize them.
- Analyzes how the revolution blurred the lines between war and government and allowed spies to assume a role in the conflict.
- Analyzes how the american war strategy regarding spying was contrasted with the ideals of the british system of war.
- Analyzes how washington used espionage throughout the war, but it was not unanimously accepted within the military or the public. nathan hale was one of the most prominent spies during the revolution and volunteered to serve as a spy.
- Explains that washington's use of espionage stemmed from the fact that he had to come up with new ways to try an outsmart the more experienced british army.
- Analyzes how the culpers used espionage as a tactic for the good of all of the americas, knowing the risk and burden that they would face if they ever got caught.
- Analyzes how robert townsend wrote a letter which conveys his feelings about the ring.
- Opines that their calling in life never required it, nor did they think it would ever fall to their lot to serve in publick and important business as this, and their letters perused by one of the worthiest men on earth.
- Opines, "i hope it may be of some service toward alleviating the misery of our distressed country, nothing but that could have induced me to undertake it."
- Explains that a personal cause is what townsend and other members used as motivation in their ongoing mission. spies on the patriot's side were more likely to be motivated by the societal benefit that they could bring by doing their duty.
- Explains that enoch crosby and john honeyman were american spies working for george washington whose responsibility included finding loyalists, reporting them and suppressing their actions.
- Explains that john honeyman was a member of the british army and fought in the french and indian war. he was sympathetic to the patriot cause and offered his services.
- Explains that espionage was a concern for the colonists because the media played on the public's fear. spies were supposed to be invisible players in the war.
- Analyzes how arnold's treachery was a consequence of his own ego, he was obsessed with power and greed, and his treason did not do much damage to the patriot movement.
- Analyzes how the board of generals convinced major andre was a spy and sentenced him to death by hanging.
- Analyzes how james fennimore cooper's the spy provides an accurate glimpse and account of the use and justification of espionage during the revolution.
- Explains that the use of espionage carried with it a heavy burden on those involved, which led to the spies risking the reputation of both themselves, their superiors and the new identity fostering in america should they ever be discovered.
- Analyzes how the idea of espionage has become a pop culture phenomenon in recent years. the fact that the patriots use it shows the radical shift that took place during the revolution when the americans broke free of their british identity
- Narrates the proceedings of a board of general officers held by order of his excellency general washington, commander in chief of the united states of america.
- Cites inglis, charles. the case of major john andre, adjutant-general to the british army, who was put to death by the rebels.
- Describes bailyn, bernard, the ideological origins of the american revolution.
- Explains baker, mark allen, spies of revolutionary connecticut: from benedict arnold to nathan hale. charlestown: the history press, 2014.
- Describes the capt. nathan hale (1755-1776) by rev. edward everett hal.
- Describes kaplan, roger, and the william and mary quarterly. the hidden war: british intelligence operations during the american revolution.
- Describes mahoney, thayer, and locke. gallantry in action: a biographic dictionary of espionage in the american revolutionary war.
- Describes pennypacker, morton, general washington's spies on long island and in new york.
- Explains rose, alexander, washington’s spies: the story of america's first spy ring.
- Explains sulick, michael j., spying in america espionage from the revolutionary war to the dawn of the cold war.
3426 words
Read More
Analysis of the Continental Army, the Oneida People and Thomas Hutchinson
analytical essay
Posterity chooses to view the American Revolution in a different light than many revolutionaries experienced it, for history is often mutable at the founding of a country. As revolutionary ideals blossomed, certain people were rejected from the pages of history. Many of them fought and bled for America, and one penned a history of his colony, but none were given historical shares of American independence. They were rejected from posterity’s heroic, romantic play of the American Revolution because their historical truths could not be cast—they created another play altogether. The following is an analysis of the Continental Army, the Oneida people and of Thomas Hutchinson— each was rejected from an idealist’s view of the American Revolution.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the continental army, the oneida people, and thomas hutchinson were rejected from an idealist's view of the american revolution.
- Analyzes how the continental army was essential to the american republic's literal translation into fact.
- Analyzes how the split between the soldiers and the larger public led to a splintering of the public from the military.
- Analyzes how the continental army, the oneida people, and thomas hutchinson were rejected from an idealist's view of the american revolution.
- Analyzes how the continental army was essential to the american republic's literal translation into fact.
- Analyzes how the split between the soldiers and the larger public led to a splintering of the public from the military.
- Analyzes how george washington's plea with his officers in 1783 to stall rebellion in newburgh represented a grand superseding of the public’s needs over those of soldiers.
- Analyzes how the triumph of civilian life overruled concerns about the revolutionary narrative. the soldiers were subordinated after the revolution because washington recognized it was necessary. no matter the hypocrisy of the people, a nation led by the military could not have fit into the grand play
- Analyzes how glatthaar and martin's forgotten allies sided with the oneida because of presbyterian minister samuel kirkland, whose alignment between christianity and iroquois values spoke directly to "communalism and collective identity."
- Analyzes how the oneida people were depredated by the state of new york after the revolutionary war. they may have been forgotten as easily as they skipped the notice of american scholars.
- Analyzes how samuel kirkland believed that he could not find any other solution than the breakup of their holdings into individual family farms, like those of european americans.
- Explains that the oneida were cast out from most of revolutionary history because europeans repossessed their landholdings and cultural affinities. casting their story in the grand revolutionary play would have spoken to the hypocrisy of americans
- Analyzes how thomas hutchinson was the scapegoat of the american revolution. his private persona was deeply guarded by his public image.
- Explains that benjamin franklin received letters from hutchinson intended for various other colonial officials. the letters ruined what tattered shreds remained of his career, and combined with the resulting boston tea party, led to britain's acceptance
- Analyzes how thomas hutchinson was rejected from posterity's heroic american revolution because he was a candle wick under which the colonists could rebel.
- Opines that it is necessary to reconcile their achievements and their losses as it would be to consider traditional revolutionary heroes.
1857 words
Read More
The Political Basis of the American Revolution
explanatory essay
- Robson, Eric. The American Revolution: In Its Political & Military Aspects. Toronto: W.W. Norton, 20066.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the political basis of the american revolution relied on three major congresses formed prior and during the revolution.
- Explains that the stamp act was a tax stamp which appeared on every newspaper, legal document, customs and shipping document. the act was passed by parliament on may 22, 1765, but was not going into effect until november 1st of that year.
- Explains that by charter and inheritance the colonists possessed, and had never yielded, the rights of englishmen.
- Explains that the political basis of the american revolution relied on three major congresses formed prior and during the revolution.
- Explains that the stamp act was a tax stamp which appeared on every newspaper, legal document, customs and shipping document. the act was passed by parliament on may 22, 1765, but was not going into effect until november 1st of that year.
- Explains that by charter and inheritance the colonists possessed, and had never yielded, the rights of englishmen.
- Explains that massachusetts called a congress before the stamp act was to go into effect. although virginia, georgia, and north carolina's governors did not permit delegates to be chosen, they declared that it was unconstitutional to tax colonies without representation.
- Explains that the congress proposed that britain could not impose taxes without the colonists or their representatives in parliament. the appeals would not be acted upon by britain or its parliament thus making the gathering useless.
- Explains how the colonists decided that the act would not be followed even if they had to resort to violence. mobs in all of the colonies began to "relieve" the stamp distributors of their position.
- Explains the intolerable acts, which were directed to the american colonists and were mostly taxes on imported goods from britain. by 1775, all the colonies were boycotting british goods.
- Explains that the first continental congress met in philadelphia on september 5, 1774. the congress faced many issues, including the rights violated by the british parliament.
- Explains that the conservatives of the first continental congress suggested improving relations with great britain and not severing relations completely between the two parties. the radicals believed that parliament had no right over the colonies.
- Opines that a trial by jury before judges, who could not be removed by the king, to assemble and petition for redress of grievances, and to have no standing army in time of peace without the consent of the colony's assembly.
- Explains that the first continental congress agreed to discontinue the importing of british goods on december 1, 1774 and exporting goods to britain on september 10, 1775.
- Explains that colonies except new york, delaware, and georgia began to stock weaponry and form local militias. after the battle of concord, the second continental congress made plans to gain their independence from great britain.
- Cites alden, john r., lacy, dan, leder, lawrence, and robson, eric.
1009 words
Read More
The Unconventional American Revolution
analytical essay
The American Revolution, the conflict by which the American colonists won their independence from Great Britain and created the United States of America, was an upheaval of profound significance in world history. It occurred in the second half of the 18th century, in an "Age of Democratic Revolution" when philosophers and political theorists in Europe were critically examining the institutions of their own societies and the notions that lay behind them. Yet the American Revolution first put to the test ideas and theories that had seldom if ever been worked out in practice in the Old World--separation of church and state, sovereignty of the people, written constitutions, and effective checks and balances in government
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the american revolution was an upheaval of profound significance in world history. it put to the test ideas and theories that had rarely if ever been worked out in the old world.
- Opines that the american revolution was not a conventional revolution. there was no change in social hierarchy as in russia, or mass killings of the
- Explains that the american revolution was unique unto itself. it could almost be called an intellectual uprising.
- Explains that the american revolution was an upheaval of profound significance in world history. it put to the test ideas and theories that had rarely if ever been worked out in the old world.
- Opines that the american revolution was not a conventional revolution. there was no change in social hierarchy as in russia, or mass killings of the
- Explains that the american revolution was unique unto itself. it could almost be called an intellectual uprising.
- Analyzes the heroism and sacrifice of long bill scott, who sacrificed his life in a war to protect the ideals of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
- Analyzes how children were engrained with american ideology by their mother in a process called'republican motherhood'. john adam's brother sneaked out of the house and marched with revolutionary soldiers.
- Explains how the common man was repressed by the wealthy upper class during the revolution. the poorer, lower social class was no longer forced to defer to the upper classes for political leadership.
- Explains that women's rights and education were toyed with during and after the revolution, something that had never been attempted before. men and women saw each other as more equal, and thus, more american.
- Opines that slavery was briefly repealed in some states, but it was an unprecedented burst of human rights, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
- Explains that the american governing system can be called a mix-and-match of many governments through time, including greek, roman, and english.
- Explains that the american revolution was not only unique, but extraordinary. it was a fight for freedom, fought in order that people may develop on their own.
726 words
Read More
More than a Radical Revolution
analytical essay
Gordon Wood’s book, The Radicalism of the American Revolution, creates a new perspective for the ideals of the American Revolution. Wood adds to the idea that the revolution was not simply a conservative mutiny and fight for neutrality, but also a social revolution. Wood was born in November of 1993 and attended Brown University; He won the 1933 Pulitzer Prize for The Radicalism of the American Revolution. In The Radicalism of the American Revolution Wood argues that the revolution actually began in the 1760’s and continue into the early 19th century as the country experienced a social transformation where people changed their habits and united rather that attempting to overthrow each other. He argues that the American Revolution was far beyond conservative. Wood describes how in order for our country to prosper we must do the impossible and separate our government from the citizens of our country. This would be a revolution in itself. Wood quotes that, “… if we measure the radicalism by the amount of social change that actually took place — by transformations in the relationships that bound people to each other — then the American Revolution was not conservative at all; on the contrary, it was as radical and revolutionary as any in history.”
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gordon wood's book, the radicalism of the american revolution, adds to the idea that the revolution was not just a conservative mutiny and fight for neutrality, but also social revolution.
- Analyzes how wood develops his argument for a social revolution by reiterating the change in america’s form of monarchy government to democracy where the people are in charge of the government.
- Analyzes how gordon wood argues that the american revolution was a true social revolution that changed america forever.
- Analyzes how gordon wood's book, the radicalism of the american revolution, adds to the idea that the revolution was not just a conservative mutiny and fight for neutrality, but also social revolution.
- Analyzes how wood develops his argument for a social revolution by reiterating the change in america’s form of monarchy government to democracy where the people are in charge of the government.
- Analyzes how gordon wood argues that the american revolution was a true social revolution that changed america forever.
- Analyzes how the founders were able to overcome the struggles faced while building a society based on the new government.
814 words
Read More
What the Stamp Act Really Meant
explanatory essay
Middlekauff, Robert. The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Print.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that patrick henry was one of the first colonists to openly attack the stamp act, comparing george iii to julius caesar as well as charles i.
- Explains that the british government was in a great deal of debt after the seven years war. they won the war but it came at quite an expense.
- Explains that the stamp act had already been imposed on the people of great britain with great results. the colonists saw it more like if england were to tax the united states today.
- Explains that patrick henry was one of the first colonists to openly attack the stamp act, comparing george iii to julius caesar as well as charles i.
- Explains that the british government was in a great deal of debt after the seven years war. they won the war but it came at quite an expense.
- Explains that the stamp act had already been imposed on the people of great britain with great results. the colonists saw it more like if england were to tax the united states today.
- Explains that the sugar act was passed just one year before the stamp act, which angered the colonists and paid for the national debt.
- Explains that the colonists feared for their rights because the stamp act had a potentially wide application on the economy.
- Opines that the stamp act is a big reason why the united states is here today. it got the colonists wanting their independence.
- Explains middlekauff, robert, the glorious cause: the american revolution, new york: oxford university press, 2005.
- Explains boston's order of the city council, 1886.
- Explains the stamp act and how it was brought about and what it meant to the american colonies.
- Explains that the stamp act was repealed in 1766, but the declaratory act was passed soon after to show colonists that they had the power to legislate for the colonies.
1654 words
Read More
A New Kind Of Revolution By Carl N. Degler Summary
opinion essay
Wood’s article is about how it is radical, I believe that the American Revolution should be consider a radical movement instead of a conservative movement. Even though many people think that the reasons behind the Revolution seem to be conservative, the methods used to reach and gain their rights, as well as their independence, seem more radical then conservative. Carl N. Degler believed that the American Revolution is a conservative movement. “In the eighteenth century… support of the state (Degler, 123).” The Constitution in 1788 clearly stated that the state and church would remain separated; however, majority of the Revolution were somehow connected with religion. On the other hand, Gordon S. Wood thought the Revolution was more of a radical movement. “They made speeches… no storming of prisons (Wood, 130).” Within the first paragraph,
In this essay, the author
- Compares carl n. degler's "a new kind of revolution" and gordon s. wood' "the radicalism of the american revolution." the framers wanted to create a free nation where no single person
- Opines that the american revolution should be considered a radical movement instead of conservative.
- Compares carl n. degler's "a new kind of revolution" and gordon s. wood' "the radicalism of the american revolution." the framers wanted to create a free nation where no single person
- Opines that the american revolution should be considered a radical movement instead of conservative.
414 words
Read More
Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution
analytical essay
Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution is a book that extensively covers the origin and ideas preceding the American Revolution. Wood’s account of the Revolution goes beyond the history and timeline of the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces of the war. Wood explains in his book that America went through a two-stage progression to break away from the Monarchical rule of the English. He believes the pioneering revolutionaries were rooted in the belief of an American Republic. However, it was the radical acceptance of democracy that was the final step toward independence. The transformation between becoming a Republic, to ultimately becoming a democracy, is where Wood’s evaluation of the revolution differs from other historians. He contributes such a transformation to the social and economic factors that faced the colonists. While Gordon Wood creates a persuasive argument in his book, he does however neglect to consider other contributing factors of the revolution. It is these neglected factors that provide opportunity for criticism of his book.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gordon wood's radicalism of the american revolution covers the origin and ideas preceding the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces.
- Analyzes how wood believes that republicanism was not a radical concept to the american colonists. the idea of republicanism was seen in the colonial belief in independence and self-sacrifice.
- Analyzes how wood points out the "uncontrollable" social and economic forces that lead republican thought to the progression of democracy.
- Analyzes how gordon wood's radicalism of the american revolution covers the origin and ideas preceding the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces.
- Analyzes how wood believes that republicanism was not a radical concept to the american colonists. the idea of republicanism was seen in the colonial belief in independence and self-sacrifice.
- Analyzes how wood points out the "uncontrollable" social and economic forces that lead republican thought to the progression of democracy.
- Explains that wood contributed several social and economic factors to the transformation. the colonist self-interest conflicted with republican principles.
- Explains that social factors played an important role in the transformation from a monarchy to. democracy, but there were also economic factors, such as trade interaction among the colonists.
- Analyzes how wood builds his argument by supporting his claims with personal accounts and using documents of that time period. wood's lack of concrete evidence gives historians a chance to critique his account
- Analyzes how smith points out that wood relies on a limited source base and neglects to mention other racial and gender forces that played an important role in the revolution.
- Opines that wood's revolution takes too much credit for ending slavery and makes it difficult to comprehend or even credit those who opposed abolition. wood left out such forces to get at the overall ideas and ideologies behind the revolution.
- Analyzes wood's dereliction to include traditional forces, which played an intricate part of the revolution. wood neglects to mention the boston tea party as a driving force for the revolutionary movement.
- Analyzes how wood neglects traditional forces by depersonalizing the heroism that personifies the struggle of the american revolution.
- Analyzes how wood's attempt to depersonalize the war was successful, but it led to a dehumanizing effect on the revolution.
- Opines that wood's book could have been better had he mentioned at least some of the traditional forces that were significant during the revolution.
- Opines that gordon wood's argument is persuasive and refreshing, but his focus on non-traditional forces leads to their criticism of the book.
- Opines that wood should have combined his insight along with the insight of other traditional forces to give his book a well-rounded theory behind the american revolution.
1486 words
Read More
Was The American Revolution Radical Essay
analytical essay
During the American revolution, the revolution itself was radical for the merchants and other groups of people. Radical means that there is social, economic and political change. The American revolution gave new economic significant to groups of people such as thee merchants. The revolution was radical because many merchants economic opputonity before the French and Indian War the merchant were benefiting and after they having to deal with new taxation. Also after the revolution the merchant group face a time of economic problems until the US constitution was enacted. The revolution was radical for the merchant economically and politically.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the american revolution was radical for the merchants and other groups of people.
- Analyzes how the american revolution changed north america and how it was defined. before the french and indian wars, the colonist did not have to pay any taxes. the declaration of independence was written to separate from the british government.
- Explains that during the salutary neglect period many merchants were benefiting because the british government had minimal involvement in the american colonies.
- Explains that the american revolution was radical for the merchants and other groups of people.
- Analyzes how the american revolution changed north america and how it was defined. before the french and indian wars, the colonist did not have to pay any taxes. the declaration of independence was written to separate from the british government.
- Explains that during the salutary neglect period many merchants were benefiting because the british government had minimal involvement in the american colonies.
- Explains that the government ended the salutary neglect period and entailed the stamp act and the sugar act. this radical economic change, made the merchants support the american revolution.
- Analyzes how the british government decided to place taxes on the french and indian wars. merchants protested against the stamp act in boston.
- Explains that the us constitution was radical for merchants in terms of economic benefits. the thirteen colonies created the articles of confederation.
- Opines that the american revolution was radical for some groups of people. it allowed merchants to be politically involved to gain their interest.
985 words
Read More