Npv Essay

1522 Words4 Pages

The rationale behind the NPV method is straightforward: if a project has NPV = $0, then the project generates exactly enough cash flows (1) to recover the cost of the investment and (2) to enable investors to earn their required rates of return (the opportunity cost of capital). If NPV = $0, then in a financial (but not an accounting) sense, the project breaks even. If the NPV is positive, then more than enough cash flow is generated, and conversely if NPV is negative.
Consider franchise L 's cash inflows, which total $150. They are sufficient (1) to return the $100 initial investment, (2) to provide investors with their 10 percent aggregate opportunity cost of capital, and (3) to still have $18.79 left over on a present value basis. This …show more content…

If the franchises are mutually exclusive, then franchise S should be chosen over L, because s adds more to the value of the firm.
a. Capital budgeting is the method used to determine whether a firm should invest in a project. To determine if a project should be invested in, firms use methods such as net present value and internal rate of return to analyze the projected cash flows. Firms should choose projects that increase its …show more content…

The main disadvantage of the discounted payback period is that it does not account for cash flows after the payback period. Most companies still use the payback period because it does give information in about risk and liquidity. But, it does not hold as much weight as the NPV and IRR do when deciding to pursue a project.

j. 1. Cash flows that start with an outflow then have inflows are normal cash flows. Nonnormal cash flows are cash flows that change between positive and negative cash flows more than once. Project P is an example of nonnormal cash flows.

2. Project P’s NPV is $386,777, the IRR is 25.00%, and its MIRR is 5.60%.

3. Project P has nonnormal cash flows. The project’s cash flows begin with a negative, then a positive, and ends with a negative cash flow. This project should not be accepted because its NPV is negative and its MIRR is less than the cost of capital.

k. 1. The NPV for Project S without replication is $4,132.23 and $6,190.49 for Project L. The calculated NPV does not include the cash flows of Project S when the project will be replicated. Based on these NPVs, Project L should be chosen over Project S.

2. The equivalent annual annuity for Project S is $2,380.95 and $1,952.92 for Project L. IF these projects are mutually exclusive, Project S should be accepted because its equivalent annual annuity is higher than the Project

Open Document