More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences between modern societies and traditional societies
Differences between modern societies and traditional societies
Differences between modern societies and traditional societies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Giver, their community was created to make everyone and everything the same. Things such as color, music, memory of the history of the world, and feelings were taken away from the people living in the community. The community in The Giver tried to protect the people from making wrong choices by taking away choices. The citizens in the community did the have the freedom to choose where they wanted to do their volunteer hours. Their version of a perfect society and culture are very different to communities and cities like Chicago, IL and the Amish lifestyle,. There are many pro’s and con’s to each community that separate their differences. Chicago, IL is a large, busy, and chaotic city. In any city there are several pros and cons about
In this community of The Giver, the advantages get outweighed by the disadvantages. The citizens get harsh punishments for the smallest issues, no one in the community (except Jonas after a while and The Giver) gets to experience real emotions that are actually what they feel-not what they think they feel, and they kill/release innocent newchildren that don’t weigh enough or aren’t maturing fast enough. When you weigh the pros and cons of being in the community, you can see that people would be much better off living out of it, rather than being a part of the
for the north side of Chicago and will be for many years in the future.
Chicago, one of the most popular cities in America. Visits from families all around the country, what makes this place so great? Is it the skyscrapers that protrude the sky? Or is it the weather people loved? Does Chicago being the second most favored city in America show that this town has some greatness? In the nonfiction novel The Devil in the White City, Erik Larson uses imagery, tone, and figurative language to portray the dreamlike qualities of Chicago and the beauty that lies within this city.
A community is a group of people who work together towards a common goal and share a common interest. Lack of such a quality can and most likely will cause a struggling town or city to fall into the extremes of poverty and wealth. The New England community was so strong and so supportive in comparison to that of the Chesapeake Bay, that it is no wonder they developed into two distinctly different cultures before the year 1700. The Chesapeake region developed into a land of plantations and money-driven owners, with the elite wealthy, almost no middle class, and those in poverty creating the population. New England, on the other hand, had developed into a religion and family based society comprised of mostly middle class families by 1700. Looking at the terrain, ethic, government, and even the people themselves, reveals clues about how the drastic split in society came to be. It was one America, but two distinct societies had developed in it by the 1700's.
In short, she is heartwarming, sunny, lively and dangerous as most large cities. She is good to the soul and as cold as the wind. Chicago is the Windy City also the City with Big Shoulders in the end Chicago is my Home .
In these two societies, they both are similar by having a strict government that does not let anyone leave the community but however, in The Giver no body...
Kerr, Walter. "'Chicago' Comes On Like Doomsday." Rev. of Chicago. New York Times 8 June 1975, Arts and Leisure sec.: 109. New York Times Archives. New York Times. Web. 1 May 2014.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
How can the type of a community shape the values people live by? In both Kathleen Norris’ “Can You Tell The Truth in a Small Town” and Maya Angelou’s “Reclaiming Our Home Place” the way community will shape the values people live by are very well represented from examples of a women in a small town stealing money from the government without a second thought because the money was for her community, to an example of people in communities sharing different items with their neighbors because they share similar interests. The essays are similar in the way that they answer the question of how the type of community shapes the values people live by but they give two different perspectives on the community that people live in from out in the small
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
The Amish community, Charlotte North Carolina, and the community in the novel “The Giver” are all places that have a successful society in which many people live or choose to live in. All of these communities have “pros” and “cons” that interest people or turn people away from living in the community. Despite the fact that many people think that living in an Amish community would not be something they were willing to do, there must be some pros of living there or no one would be living in an Amish community. In the Amish community, there is no violence (25 Things), you are very close to your family and there is a very strong religion that comes with being Amish (Conway, Tracy Lynn).The Amish people also never have to buy food or clothing for themselves or their families (Conway, Tracy Lynn).Even though this might seem intriguing there are many cons that come with being Amish and living in an Amish community.
The communities were built with an abundance of houses that would allow families with all of the same interests to reside as one and work together as community. These communities would have community events to bring the community closer. The citizens of these communities were the typical American families with cars and children that lived in the house with the white picket fence. The citizens of the communities would compete to see who had the best decorated houses and win awards. It kept the community members involved in the community (Hales, Levittown: Documents of an Ideal American Suburb). This type of community helped camouflage the lives of
Where I live is one of the greatest neighborhoods in the city to live in; however it does have its draw backs. Importantly it has nearly everything a resident might want, beautiful picturesque scenery, proximity to shopping, and many of the cultural centers. Nevertheless the roads can be some of the most congested in town, and the streets are not safe to walk late at night.