The Pros And Cons Of Private Prisons

1872 Words4 Pages

Between 1978 and 2014 the United States’s incarcerated population increased 408% (aclu.org). As a result, America has struggled to meet the demands on inmate housing. In response to rising inmate populations, America has long used privatization of prisons to account for the increasing overcapacity. Proponents of private prisons claim that private prisons are cheaper without losing the quality of services. However, despite the establishment of the first private prison institute in 1984 (Seiter 417), private prisons have not met their claims. No proof exists in support that private prisons save taxpayer money; prisons are still over capacity with corruption still prevalent. While shutting down all private prisons immediately is not practical, …show more content…

He is also an Associate Director of the non-profit organization the Human Rights Defense Center (HRDC), Managing Editor of HRDC’s monthly publication, and a non-compensated President of the Private Corrections Institute, an organization that opposes privatization of prisons. In 2014, Fordham Urban Law Journal at Fordham University published his academic journal called, Apples-To-Fish: Public and Private Prison Cost Comparisons, where Friedman breaks down various reasons why documentable evidence is inconclusive regarding prison privatization, such as prisoner cherry picking (509-530), recidivism rates (545, 561), and corner cutting (550-558). Another article published in ___ written by Michael Brickner and Shakyra Diaz for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called Prisons for Profit looks into the financial motive of private prisons and safety precautions for communities. Brickner is Director of Communication and Public Policy and Diaz is the Policy Director for the ACLU, both co-authored Ohio’s ___ report on prison …show more content…

Beginning in the 80s the U.S. developed a tough-on-crime mindset that set the precedence for increased incarceration and introduced minimum sentences and jail time for petty crimes such as property damage (Brickner and Diaz). Thus, the U.S. then had a new problem: how to account for the new prison population. From the very beginning, Private Prisons main purpose was to be a cost-saving way of dealing with the increasing overpopulation. However, despite the three decades (and a number of facility increase of 45% between 2000 and 2011(Seiter 418)) in which private prisons have existed there has been zero conclusive evidence to support the claim (Friedman 505-509; Seiter 427; Brickner and Diaz). Despite various studies to investigate the cost savings or expenditures of private prisons, the results vary tremendously. Some findings support the claim that private prisons save money (Seiter), while others report no savings (Friedman; Seiter), and furthermore, some conclude higher costs (Friedman; Seiter). Therein lies a problem. For a solution to not meet the demands set by oneself is a red flag. There is no point in repeating what has not proven to be successful in over 30 years. After 30 years privatization of prisons exceeds an experimental endeavor and should by this point be meeting certain expectations, yet they are not. Another factor to consider is how private prisons

Open Document