The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

1108 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Ethics of Human Genetic Engineering

potential risk of unforeseen consequences that could have a negative impact on future generations. Additionally, the ability to design a "perfect" baby could lead to a decrease in genetic diversity, which is essential for the survival of the human race. Furthermore, the moral and ethical concerns surrounding human genetic engineering cannot be ignored. The idea of creating a "designer baby" raises questions about the value of human life and the potential for discrimination based on genetic traits. In conclusion, while the potential benefits of human genetic engineering are tempting, the risks and ethical concerns outweigh any potential advantages.
The process of genetic engineering comes with very high risks, such as gene mutation, which could result in either a positive or negative outcome, making it a 50-50 chance. However, the Natural Selection theory states that every individual is born untouched and has the freedom to become whoever they choose to be. Through genetic engineering, scientists would be able to modify unborn children to meet the standards set by their parents. This would result in a world where everyone is "fake" and not the creation of God. The entire population would consist of humans who are not true to themselves but rather the people their parents wished for them to become. People would act like robots, striving to be the best genetically modified version of themselves. Genetic engineering would only bring negative consequences to the world. It defies the laws of nature, goes against God's conception, and changes the newborn's natural state.

Show More
Related

  • Ethical Dilemmas of Genetically Engineering Human Embryos

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    A person's individuality begins at conception and develops throughout life. These natural developments can now be changed through genetically engineering a human embryo. Through this process, gender, eye and hair color, height, medical disorders, and many more qualities can be changed. I believe genetically engineering a human embryo is corrupt because it is morally unacceptable, violates the child's rights, and creates an even more divided society.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Beefalo

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Usage of genetic modification to pick and chose features and personality traits of embryos could conceivably occur in future times. Wealthy individuals could essentially purchase a baby with built-in genetic advantages (Simmons). Ethically, these seem immoral. Playing God and taking control over the natural way of life makes some understandably uneasy. Ultimately, religious and moral standpoints should play a role in the future of genetic engineering, but not control it. Genetic engineering’s advantages far outweigh the cost of a genetically formulated baby and

    Read More

  • Gattaca Presents A World Destroyed By The Pursuit Of Perfection Essay

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    A problem that could arise is a repeat of history. Inequality. Our society would be divided into two groups, the “valids” or “perfect humans” and the “in-valids” or “non perfect humans.” This is just another form of discrimination, whereby people are judged because of the circumstances of they were born, something that they have no control over. "I belong to a new underclass, no longer determined by social status or the colour of your skin. We now have discrimination down to a science." -Vincent. In the film “in-valids were granted less rights than the “valids.” Sounds familiar? In the 1960’s many protests occurred because of the inequality and brutality against African-Americans, who had their rights taken away from them based on the colour of their skin. Introducing the practice of genetically modifying humans to live up to the ideology of perfection could cause protests, violence, chaos and possibly a repeat of the Civil Rights Movement. For many years our society has been attempting to eliminate inequality, but this practice could just as easily re-create

    Read More

  • Designer Babies: Genetic Engineering

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    What do one think of when they hear the words “Designer Babies”? A couple designing their own baby of course, and it’s become just that. Technology has made it possible for there to be a way for doctors to modify a babies characteristics and its health. Genetically altering human embryos is morally wrong, and can cause a disservice to the parents and the child its effecting.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most controversial topics discussed in the world of medicine pertained to the topic of genetic engineering. Some doctors saw it as tool of world destruction, however many of them seeing it as a chance of potential cures and treatments. Charles Darwin first introduced this idea. In his first publication, The Origin of Species, he introduced the idea of survival of the fittest. He stated that evolutionary change was only possible due to the genetic variation between each generation, including the combination of different characteristics. In other words, he wrote that only those who had desirable characteristics, in terms of survival, would be able to pass down their genes. If two bred and possessed desirable characteristics, then the desirable characteristic would strengthen, modifying the genes. Darwin’s theories have been the base of many medical breakthroughs that contributed to genetic engineering. The idea soon influenced medicine, the idea of strengthening the healthy cells and isolating them from the unhealthy ones. The simple idea Darwin discovered had changed medicine as a whole. Today, doctors and scientists are able to manipulate genes in order to create new treatments and cures. Today, Darwin’s discovery changed and saved millions of lives around the world. Despite the fact that genetic engineering can have a negative impact on society, it was an important discovery due to the advancement in conventional medicine.

    Read More

  • Genetic Engineering Good Or Bad Essay

    1661 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most necessary uses of genetic engineering is tackling diseases. As listed above, some of the deadliest diseases in the world that have yet to be conquered could ultimately be wiped out by the use of genetic engineering. Because there are a great deal of genetic mutations people suffer from it is impractical that we will ever be able to get rid of them unless we involve genetic engineering in future generations (pros and cons of genetic eng). The negative aspect to this is the possible chain reaction that can occur from gene alteration. While altering a gene to do one thing, like cure a disease, there is no way of knowing if a different reaction will occur at the cellular or genetic level because of it; causing another problem, possibly worse than the disease they started off with (5 pros and cons of gen. eng.). This technology has such a wide range of unknown, it is simply not safe for society to be condoning to. As well as safety concerns, this can also cause emotional trauma to people putting their hopes into genetic engineering curing their loved ones, when there is a possibility it could result in more damage in the

    Read More

  • Designer Babies: What is Ethical?

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine a parent walking into what looks like a conference room. A sheet of paper waits on a table with numerous questions many people wish they had control over. Options such as hair color, skin color, personality traits and other physical appearances are mapped out across the page. When the questions are filled out, a baby appears as he or she was described moments before. The baby is the picture of health, and looks perfect in every way. This scenario seems only to exist in a dream, however, the option to design a child has already become a reality in the near future. Parents may approach a similar scenario every day in the future as if choosing a child’s characteristics were a normal way of life. The use of genetic engineering should not give parents the choice to design their child because of the act of humans belittling and “playing” God, the ethics involved in interfering with human lives, and the dangers of manipulating human genes.

    Read More

  • Human Engineering Brave New World Essay

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    The quality of life for these people would increase exponentially and they would have many more opportunities that they were fated to struggle to reach. Human genetic engineering can improve the quality of life of so many people, from start to finish. This technology is constantly being innovated and improved, and it will continue to better the lives of people on Earth. The rapid advancement of human genetic engineering may be intimidating and confusing, but the potential to improve the lives of many people makes it worth exploring. HGE has already advanced in ways that people in the 1900’s would have called witchcraft, and this field will continue to advance!

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Designer Babies

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    It will make diversity and uniqueness weak, everyone will be "perfect" and no one will focus on the uniqueness of human beings. The great things we may achieve will be of less value since more people will be similar and have those same abilities. Children will be less appreciated because they will be more of a product (robot) than a unique gift. Through this practice we will face the dangers of races being eliminated and our world becoming a male dominated place. Genetic modification takes away our right to create and live our own story. If we are all genetically modified our lives will all be similar and less exciting. If creating designer babies will weaken diversity and uniqueness, why should we allow it? The world will be dull and full of clones, is it worth

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of Genetic Engineering

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    Coker claims that “[h]umans have many faults, but we are not dumber or less trustworthy than random chance” (Coker. 2013. para. 3). The “random chance” mentioned is actually considered by many people to be some type of a greater power or a God. Possibly the main reason people do not agree with genetic engineering is because they do not believe human creation is random, they believe each person is made individually with care. If this is true, then it is inconceivable as to why someone would want to change the work of an omniscient God. Besides this, humans cannot necessarily be trusted to engineer their own DNA when they can barely be trusted to keep up with their own health. One could argue that bodily maintenance would not be needed if genetic engineering was possible but in reality, there is no “skinny gene” or “healthy gene”. The human body is constantly working and being introduced to new bacterium, therefore it is always adapting in order to stay alive. Because of these responsibilities and constant changes, creating the perfect human is not possible, and even if it were, humans should not be trusted to perform this

    Read More

  • Genetic Engineering is Immoral

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    Genetic engineering for humans would eventually destroy the human natural selection theory, that everyone brought into this world was untouched and born to be who ever they were suppose to be. But with genetic engineering, scientists would be able to change unborn children to make them for acceptable to the human world.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

    1309 Words  | 3 Pages

    With all factors put into place the potential benefits of perfecting human genetic engineering far outweigh the negatives. A world with genetic engineering is a world that would be advantageous to all who undergo the procedure to positively modify their DNA. A genetically engineered human race will be able to have defeated all genetic mutations and diseases, rid humans of possible illnesses in young and unborn children, create drastically longer lifespans, and provide generations with a high quality of life. Human genetic engineering has progressed more rapidly than projected; according to Stephen Hawking, when human genetic engineering is consummated he hypothesizes, “With genetic engineering, we will be able to increase the complexity of our DNA, and improve the human race. But it will be a slow process, because one will have to wait about 18 years to see the effect of changes to the genetic code.”(Hawking). The advancements that genetic engineering will provide for the human race is incredible and we will soon benefit from science and technology more than ever

    Read More

  • Human Genetic Engineering

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Human genetic engineering can provide humanity with the capability to construct “designer babies” as well as cure multiple hereditary diseases. This can be accomplished by changing a human’s genotype to produce a desired phenotype. The outcome could cure both birth defects and hereditary diseases such as cancer and AIDS. Human genetic engineering can also allow mankind to permanently remove a mutated gene through embryo screening, as well as allow parents to choose the desired traits for their children. Negative outcomes of this technology may include the transmission of harmful diseases and the production of genetic mutations.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although genetic engineering seems to be more harmful than helpful, when used correctly, it will help the society prosper. Considering the technology our society has currently developed, genetic engineering is a difficult topic to discuss and confirm. If the researchers confirm this process, it may become easier for the scientists and will help cure the diseases easily. The debate, however, will still be on the rise because of the issue in human morals and ethics.

    Read More

  • Genetic Engineering Brings More Harm Than Good

    1953 Words  | 4 Pages

    Until the recent demise of the Soviet Union, we lived under the daily threat of nuclear holocaust extinguishing human life and the entire biosphere. Now it looks more likely that total destruction will be averted, and that widespread, but not universally fatal, damage will continue to occur from radiation accidents from power plants, aging nuclear submarines, and perhaps the limited use of tactical nuclear weapons by governments or terrorists. What has gone largely unnoticed is the unprecedented lethal threat of genetic engineering to life on the planet. It now seems likely, unless a major shift in international policy occurs quickly, that the major ecosystems that support the biosphere are going to be irreversibly disrupted, and that genetically engineered viruses may very well lead to the eventual demise of almost all-human life. In the course of the major transformations that are on the way, human beings will be transformed, both intentionally and unintentionally, in ways that will make us something different than what we now consider human.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

Open Document