Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mars colonization 2040
Colonizing mars thesis
Colonizing mars thesis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mars colonization 2040
To say colonisation is realistic, we must first establish a reason for it. Capitalist nations such as the United States are notorious for only committing to such operations with the promise of a significant amount of money in return. With the Apollo missions, the reward was seen to be victory over the competing USSR. As the Earth is drained of natural resources such as fuels and more recently, water, mankind is to be stretched further to find materials to maintain its population. In September of 2009, NASA announced that it has discovered traces of water on the moon. The state funded company estimated that there was at least 600 million tonnes of ice at the North Pole in sheets of pure ice of a few metres thickness. With this information, …show more content…
This proved Mars is reachable and opened the debate about whether or not to send humans. However, I believe the moon would be a short-term alternative, allowing scientists to study the effects on the body that living on an alien planet would undoubtedly have. It would allow time to develop technologies which would make it easier to live in these harsh environments. Furthermore, it would enable the measuring of factors such as the surface radiation levels; assessing the effects of galactic and cosmic radiation. Further advantages of choosing the Moon, linking with Mars also, is the idea that the moon would be a suitable location to launch rockets that would be set for mars. This would be easier than from Earth as the Moons gravity is lower and therefore requires a much lower escape velocity. This means less propellant used and theoretically a lower price. Of course this does not take into account the manufacturing cost of creating a base on the moon capable of building and launching a rocket, and also assumes all materials used to make the rocket were mined from the Moon. You also have a relatively short transit time. The Apollo missions took approximately three days, and this was with technology far inferior to what we would have now. In comparison, a trip to Mars would take 6 months. It would then take 19 months to wait for the planets to realign, and then 6 months for the return
The moment astronauts set foot on Earth’s Moon, in July of 1969, the legacy of the United States’ space program changed forever. Countless Americans watched the launch and landing of Apollo 13 on their televisions with pride on that day, proud of their country for achieving such an insane goal as walking on the Moon. While NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, struggled through obstacle after obstacle, invented new technologies and advanced old ones, placed the first man on the Moon, because the Soviet Union threatened to beat the U.S. to the space frontier, the nation greatly congratulated the feat that began the technological era. After forty-five years, however, the awe Americans held over NASA’s programs dwindled considerably. Although NASA no longer holds the nation in awe over their moon mission achievements, NASA programs remain vital to the United States because they advance everyday technologies, inspire creative visions, and discover greater knowledge for the entire public to benefit from.
Textbooks and literature in general are filled with exploration of New Worlds and territories, it is a natural human desire to want to know more about the unknown. When Columbus then discovered a New World, fraught with possibilities in 1492, it opened up a whole new adventure for Europe. (Goldfield, the American Journey, 17). Many countries over the next several hundred years took a stab at colonizing the New World, and creating their own versions of their countries in it.
Wasteful, useless, pointless – and many more colorful words have been used to describe the budget allotted to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States, NASA. You could almost make 24 stacks of one-dollar bills tall enough to reach space with the $17.5 billion that were budgeted this year alone. It’s a staggering amount at first glance I’ll admit, but there is so much more return in NASA’s work that many fail to see.
The real reason we never went back to the moon stemmed from American domestic politics. After the first moon landing, public and political opinion clamored to bring the lunar exploration program to an end to address more earthly concerns, such as poverty and environmental
The ice sheet extends from about 60° to 83°N over a distance of 2,400 km in the North Atlantic Ocean. The ice sheet covers 1.71 million km2 , or roughly 80% of the surface of Greenland. It consists of a northern dome and a southern dome, with maximum elevations of 3,230 m and 2,850 m, respectively, linked by a long saddle with elevations around 2,500 m. Its total volume is about 2.85 million km3, which, if it were to melt entirely, would raise global sea level by about 7.2 m. The ice sheet has an average thickness of 1,670 m and reaches a maximum of 3,300 m in the center. The bedrock surface below the ice sheet is an extensive flat area near sea level, which would rebound by as much as 1,000 m if the ice sheet were to be removed (Figure 1). Precipitation over Greenland generally decreases from south to north, ranging from about 2,500 mm per year in the southeast to less than 150 mm per year in interior northeastern Greenland. The southern high precipitation zone is largely determined by the Icelandic low and the resulting onshore flow which is forced to ascend the surface of the ice sheet. In contrast to Antarctica, summer temperatures on Greenland are high enough to cause widespread summer melting. This results in an ablation zone with negative mass balance all around its perimeter. Ablation rates are highest over the southwestern part of the ice sheet where...
Amos, Jonathan. “Deep Ice tells Long Climate Story.” BBC News. BBC News. 9/4/2006. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
The objective of this mission was to get samples from the moon and bring them back to earth and study them. The astronauts were going to take pictures and bring them back to earth as well. And more importantly was to complete the goal by president John F. Kennedy on may 25 , 1961, to put the first man in the moon. The astronauts set off on July 20 1969.
However, humans don't necessarily have to live in a planet. The Moon is a highly reliable place to live on, as scientists at NASA have found nearly 10 billion tons of water on it. It is also fairly close to Earth; it only takes about 48 hours to reach the Moon. In addition, it has the same it is roughly the same distance from the Sun as the Earth. In fact, this is such a reliable place to inhabit, Russia plans to launch a moon colonization program in the year 2030. I think we can all look forward to this, but there are many flaws on the moon. Firstly, there is no atmosphere, so there are solar flares, which can wipe out an entire earth-scaled city. Secondly, there is no weather on the moon, and that could mean that there would be no agriculture, which means that there would be no renewable foods. If these conditions lead to the stop of the Russian Moon Colonization Program, then another alternative might be
Different parts of the world all wanted to have a man on the moon. “In 1957, the Soviet Union had ignited the space race with its launch of the Sputnik 1, the world’s first Satellite” (Bodden 13). “The U.S. rushed to keep up with the space technology of the Soviet Union, launching the Explorer 1, its own small satellite. That same year, the U.S. formed a special space program which they named NASA” (Bodden 12). An amazing amount of preparation was put into not only the Apollo 11 mission, but also many other NASA Apollo missions as well, for the stakes were high. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy proposed a national goal of landing on the moon by the end of the 1960’s. It took NASA eight years to fulfill this intention (Apollo 11). The announcement by the President was a step in creating the full-fledged race. Multiple test flights then took place for America, including the one in March 1969 using the spacecraft that would actually go to the moon. That was just the start of the great American victory to
The final three Apollo missions were canceled due to an economic recession and low public interest. The Apollo program in todays’ dollars cost well over $110 billion (LaFleur). Works Cited for: Achenbach, Joel. The “Which Way To Space?” Washington Post. 23
Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.
The idea of building a colony on the Moon has been with NASA since the 1960’s and now they have the technology and collaboration to do it. A colony should be built on the Moon because humanity has the technology to get there and it would provide many benefits. The first question of building this colony is how NASA and other space-faring corporations plan to do it. The first step in their plan is finding a place to build the colony. Most of the moon is very hot or very cold, with freezing low temperatures of -454℉ and scorching highs of 212℉.
Apollo 8, launched on 21 December 1968 – this was the second successful mission and the first to reach the surface of the moon. The crew was led by Neil A. Armstrong, returned safely to earth.
Mankind, finally motivated by the impending doom of their planet, worked together instead of against. The ozone layer of the atmosphere had deteriorated and natural resources were deplenished, Earth could no longer sustain life. After a year of planning and construction the first probe was sent to Kepler-186f in 2036. Originally thought to be impossible, NASA developed the warp engine allowing spacecraft to travel at speeds faster than the speed of light. This advancement allowed the colonization probe to reach the planet in 33 days.
Humans can expect to face some major challenges on an expedition to Mars. It has been proven that humanity can travel in space for over two years. Cumulatively, Sergei Constantinovich Krikalev, a Russian cosmonaut, has spent over eight-hundred and three days in Earth orbit (Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2005). The expedition to Mars would require the crew to endure a six month journey to the planet, a year of living on the planet, and a six months journey back to Earth. Russian cosmonaut, Valery V. Polyakoz, clocking in at four-hundred and thirty-eight days for just one stay in Earth orbit, shows humanity is capable of a twelve month round trip to Mars (Schwirtz, 2009).