Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about book censorship
Essays about book censorship
Arguments against book censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Our system for banning books is flawed. Classic books are important to readers. The religion you in believe will play a factor on what people think about books. Therefore, the law will limit parents ability on banning books. Banning books is outrageous and should not be accepted.
Books like To Kill a Mockingbird provide vital information and shows how African-Americans got treated. “White men were the authority figures in Maycomb county. They favored white opinion and believed whites were always innocent” (Lee 282). First, this quote shows that white people could do whatever they want and get away with it because they could just blame it on a black person. Parents might see this and say this book is too vulgar for their children to read.
…show more content…
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and the petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (“Constitution”). While books should not be banned because people have the right to read what they want; Books get banned anyway. Moreover, people should not be able to restrict your reading experiences. “We already have a policy . . . designed to expressly to handle such problems. It calls for the Superintendent, upon receiving an objection to a book or books, to appoint a committee to study them and make recommendations” (Board of Education v. Pico). Parents alone do not have the ability to ban books, yet they are the number one initiators for banning books. The Superintendent needs to take more action on books and not let one parent ban a book. “The standard from Pico which governs book banning decisions is that school officials may not remove a book from the school library simply because they dislike the ideas in the book” (Banning Book and the Law). This is very important because it forces parents to have an actual reason for removing the book. In other words, people need to read about the laws behind the process of banning books and what it takes to get there. We need more laws that protect books and rights to read what you want. All of the reasons I just stated is why banning books are selfish and inconsiderate. There are so many great books in the world. Banning one book isn’t going to help anything. However, it will hurt your child. Think about other people's kids and what they are missing out on. Do you really want kids to not have the same opportunities as other
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
...in restrictions are needed. Pornography should not be available to children. I do not have a problem with parental advisory labels on music. However, putting a ban on all books is a very scary proposition. Bradbury's novel does not come close to describing how miserable this world would become. Everybody in this world depends on books whether or not they are literate. It can be said that we get most of our morals and values from books. These morals are found in books such as the Bible, Aesop's Fables, and sometimes even the trashy romance novels that women tend to love. Without books, the world could be explained in one word, educated. An uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict. An uneducated world is a world at constant war. A world with out books is a dystopian world.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
Ever since pen was first put to paper there has been some form of censorship surrounding it. The most current form of censorship is to ban the books which are viewed as inappropriate. Such an act not only violates the rights of American citizens, but it also violates the rights of the students to learn. Even if the government could manage to ban all of the books that it feels are inappropriate, the thirst to read such books would only grow. Too often is it forgotten that before the banning of books was an “at home issue,” (Book Banning 1) the federal government tried to cut the flow of inappropriate information off at the source
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
Many classic books discuss the problems of racism, but have been challenged or banned throughout the years. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been banned from numerous schools because it “psychological damage to the positive integration process" and "represents institutionalized racism under the guise of good literature." To Kill a Mockingbird discusses the mistreatment of a black man wrongfully accused of a crime, reflecting real events that have happened in American history. Banning this bo...
In conclusion, book banning is necessary because children may be taught bad habits, lose the magical innocence of childhood, and not be mature enough to decide what materials to read. The banning of books, while unfortunate, is needed to help keep children safe and
When a book is banned, reasoning should be backed up with many facts and teachers should be able to agree or disagree. Teachers are the ones who have graduated from colleges and have earned this right. Though the opinions of parents matter, their opinion does not necessarily take into account all that the book has to give. Parents may not see the potential of the book as a whole. They may just see the racist language or cruel behavior in a book. What their opinions are mostly based on is the information that will keep everyone the most comfortable instead of the importance behind the basics for students to learn (Hills). Some books may include opposing ideas like this, but that does not mean that they do not have something to teach us. Many teachers take it on themselves to determine what is appropriate. They take on a certain level of self-imposed censorship to make sure that they are teaching appropriate material. Along with this, books being bought with school funds have to go through a process of approval (Zimmerman). This should eliminate any problem areas that parents may have. Besides just having the school board approving the books, many teachers have the same basic outline of what a book should include and be like. They ag...
Has your school ever banned any books due to them having inappropriate content for your age group? How did it affect you or your peers? Many schools and public libraries have started banning books because of it having unsuitable content in them. I believe that certain books should be banned from libraries because some include racial slurs, others contain a blasphemous dialogue in them and usually kids shouldn’t be exposed to these types of books because of their age, lastly other books encourage children of unsuitable lifestyles that are considered dangerous or inappropriate in this world and it’s unacceptable for many parents to have their child read such topics at such a young and innocent age.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Is there ever a time to restrict someones freedom of expression? What if it’s done to protect our children? How can we ensure that the restrictions will be causing more good, then harm? Every decent person wants to do whats best for there children.
With these two conflicting opinions it would be impossible to pass a law that would please everyone. Although if the child desires the opportunity to read the book, or to read any book at all, should they be deprived of the chance to read the book? This means any book that can be read. Including books with religious affiliation and books that may challenge the social norm. For without new ideas how can society press on and move
When you censor literature you stop the flow of information and aren’t we supposed to be supporting kids and teens learning. We as a whole need to review our rules on censoring books and find a new way. It is not good to be taking all these books out because of one’s opinion. Books are taken out but what about movies and T.V shows, they are chalked full of sexual content, about gender and suicide. Parents should not be able to censor books from schools, but they should be able to use age restrictions while not restricting information.