The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

2278 Words5 Pages

It is the year of 2016, medical researchers have come a long way compared to 50 years ago. Animal research is at its all time high when it comes to research money and the use of animal testing. Activists are speaking out left and right claiming, animals are only suffering and being killed with tremendous pain and unethically. Millions of animals are being tested every year and laws are not helping at all. Most institutions want to mention that they follow the laws for animals and they follow the guide for reducing, replacing, and reusing the animals. Even, claiming that if we do not use animals then we will have to use humans for testing. Animal testing is unethical, it kills millions of animals every year and it has shown it is very unsuccessful …show more content…

See, “9 out 10 drugs tested on animal fail” explains, Understanding Animal Research. How should we continue to support a company who fails miserably when experimenting on live animals? The way drugs or products are introduced to the public is that they go through five phases. The very first phase is where it is used on animals to get the harm or threats it could appear on a human. It is proven that even if a drug or product makes it stage two, 88% will fail and only 12% of them will even make it to stage five where they come close to be approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA). When the experimentation ends, many of the animals are so contaminated with chemicals or greatly effected that eventually die, it is rare of animals being adopted afterwards. Another claim institution like to use in their favor is that if we do not use animals then what will we use to test our products or drugs. As we seen before, even testing on animals have showed its still not as accurate. Just couple of years ago the FDA removed Suprol, Oraflex, Eferol, and Selacryn from the market after causing many deaths and illnesses. So, would this lead to testing on humans since we wouldn’t be able to use animals? No, here’s why, there are human volunteers willing to be tested on, there are computer based modeling techniques who do the research for us. There is also vitro, a test tube that had led to the finding of antibiotics, where the product is introduced the tube and then see the chemical reaction from it. Also, genetics have very well provided results where they do not react to some diseases as other genetics. So, using a type of research on these individuals would mean no harm to them. So, there is alternatives to finding research on products to make them safe and finding cures for diseases. Testing on humans is not as necessary like society wants it to prevail it, we

Open Document