The Pros And Cons Of A Written Contract

1280 Words3 Pages

Most contracts never see a courtroom and they could easily be verbal unless there is a specific reason for the contract to be in writing. But when something goes wrong, a written contract protects both parties. If one party to a valid contract believes the other party has broken the contract the party being harmed can bring a lawsuit against the party who it believes has breached the contact (Murray, 2016). The legal process determines whether the contract has been breached or whether there are circumstances that negate the breach. The court will only hear a contract dispute if the contract is valid. The difference between a Contract and an Agreement is most people use the terms "contract" and "agreement", they are not the same. A contract is an agreement between parties creating obligations …show more content…

An agreement is a mutual understanding between parties about their relative rights and responsibilities. All contracts are agreements, but not all agreements are contracts. There are six essential elements for a contract to be valid. All contracts must have an Offer, Acceptance, and Mutual Consent. Both parties must consent of their free will. Both party can be coerced or forced to sign the contract, and both parties must agree to the same terms. Implied in these three conditions is intent of the parties to create a binding agreement. If one or both parties are not serious, there 's no contract (Murray, 2016). Consideration, there must be something of value exchanged between the parties. The value can be money or services, but all parties must receive something. All parties must comprehend the seriousness of the situation and

Open Document