Educational Romanticism

938 Words2 Pages

“educational romanticism asks too much from students at the bottom of the intellectual pile, asks the wrong things from those in the middle, and asks too little from those at the top” -- Charles Murray Charles Murray, the author of “The Age of Educational Romanticism,” is a political scientist, libertarian, and author of many controversial writings involving the need of educational reform. The American Enterprise Institute published the article in May 2008. This institute …show more content…

Murray calls No Child Left Behind (NCLB) - the pinnacle of educational romanticism. The stated main purpose of NCLB is “to ensure that all children have a fair, equal and significant opportunity to obtain a high quality of education and reach, at the minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic standard and state assignments” (qtd. in Murray 35). The definition of proficient, according to Murray, was operational under NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) even before NCLB was enacted. According to NCLB, all children need to be proficient in reading and math by 2014. Murray states that educational romanticism is “out of touch with reality” due to the transcending optimism of NCLB. He says that there are no examples to show that IQ can be changed permanently during K-12, and scores correlate with IQ. Murray emphasizes, this correlation does not change with social status or ethnicity. In Murray’s opinion, romantics believe they can increase the score within the constraints on IQ by improving the schools. He backs his argument with logical evidence brought by James Coleman’s …show more content…

Murray points out a caveat to this thought that quality of schools does not matter. He agrees there are some bad schools, which bring down the academic achievement, but these are very few in number. In the end, his argument is very strong and convincing to the reader that intellectual ability is the main limiting factor and that there is very little to be changed in public schools to increase the achievements. Murray tries to explain, contrary the strong evidence how educational romanticism came to

More about Educational Romanticism

Open Document