The Practice Of The Community Heritage Lottery Fund

1029 Words3 Pages

Community heritage can be practised in a variety of ways depending on the nature of the community heritage involved. Heritage provides education opportunities for the public, from ‘all ages, abilities and backgrounds’ (Gem. 2018), helping people understand their heritage and become a part of something bigger. Practising community heritage is believed to bring communities a sense of pride and boost the economic sector within their communities. This is evident in the way community heritage is embedded within our education and economic industries which has since become a firm part of our society. The Heritage Lottery Fund (2018b) explores community heritage through the money raised by national lottery players helping areas across the UK explore, …show more content…

When applying for a grant or help from bigger organisations the authorities have to take several things into consideration, as practising methods within community heritage comes with responsibilities such as; ‘risks and legal issues, stakeholders, financial issues, communication issues, monitoring and evaluation, and sustainability’ (Groundwork. 2018b). Volunteers are a major factor when thinking about community heritage and as the volunteers are heavily involved within every aspect of the project the risks increase within the health and safety of the site and of the public. The risk assessments are completed and the local public should understand the risks involved when applying their skills to the project. The health and safety of the volunteers also links into the legal issues which can arise when starting up a community project. Other issues such as ‘rights to land access, planning constraints and meeting the requirements of public authorities’ (Groundwork. 2018d) can all be factors which affect the community heritage project. The attraction to tourism and to the wider community can be a huge advantage to some towns allowing them to become noticed on the map. However this can also be a disadvantage within the community. This is shown through the population growth of communities increase due to the attraction of certain areas involving the local heritage. Population increase can result in a housing crisis which can be resolved with the development of new properties. The development of such properties then takes the land away from the community and can also take away the heritage which can sometimes be on the buildings site. Analysing the negative side to Waterton and Watsons (2011) argument was that the people divided agreed that the concern for community heritage was that of the materiality. This concern is appropriate to which the public

Open Document