The Poisonwood Bible Character Analysis

1684 Words4 Pages

Bestolarides 1 Paul Bestolarides Professor Stark HRS 196: Global Histories 18 May 2015 Visions of the Cosmopolitan in The Poisonwood Bible In Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible, an American family resides in the Congo in 1959, determined to spread the message of Christianity to the villagers. The novel wields a cast of contemporary U.S. characters that are forced to observe the existence of the African people. The chapters that Kingsolver strategically strings together are with knowledge of a ‘post-colonial’ mindset, limiting each character’s perspective to various Cosmopolitan outcomes. Here, the novel plays as a re-examination of the non-linear structure as a means to collect the beliefs about African religion, politics, …show more content…

16-19). Most westerners are under the impression that sharing beliefs were all good for the African tribes. But, with Western attempts, the contribution of converting tribes to Christianity can be rather troublesome. This can lead to social consequences in the Cosmopolitan motive. These social consequences are the result of the outcomes for the characters of Nathan and Fowles. As both characters are Christians and assume it’s religious implications, they are fundamentally completely different characters. Nathan and Fowles play as archetypes that Kingsolver presents as missionaries. The Nathan archetype includes the devout Christian who sees every word of the Bible as truthful. Fowles character lives off the experience of the Word of God, in hopes to fulfill his duties diligently. With this in mind, Kingsolver’s main goal is to highlight the characters shared Cosmopolitan interests, with intentions of separate values. And this brings to question if being a Cosmopolitan tie into Christianity? Kingsolver lets live the religious morality play as the novel progresses with purposes to propose a Cosmopolitan ideology. To apply Kingsolver’s interpretation of these character archetypes, we must investigate other cosmopolitan viewpoints as a means to investigate Nathan’s and Fowles’ mindset. The other great thinkers, essential in exploring Kingsolvers’ intentions are the political theorist, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Emmanuel Kant, Appiah and Frantz Fanon. Appiah is a modern cosmopolitanism and popular author. Emmanuel Kant is one of the most influential philosophers as well as arguably the most profound political theorist, Frantz Fanon. With three different visions, the reader will be able to assess Kingsolver’s critique through her intended

Open Document