The Paradox Of Choice: Why More Is Less By Barry Schwartz

1717 Words4 Pages

The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, by Barry Schwartz, is focused on the analysis of personal behavior in relation to decision making. As the title implies, the author emphasizes the main point that more choices actually lead to less of an ideal experience. In recent years, choices have become almost unlimited, and this has led to an increase in unnecessary stress placed on the consumer. The availability to make decisions in virtually every aspect of life creates a new level of responsibility on individuals. Decision making can lead to an enormous group of positive and negative feelings. Some of which include satisfaction, happiness, regret, disappointment and even depression. It is important to explore the broad category of decision making …show more content…

The use of advertising plays a huge role in the explanation of decision making. Schwartz contradicts some of the methods we learned in class. He states that life would be easier if products were less personalized. In class, we discussed that target markets should be specific. Another connecting communication principle is Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs. In class we discussed how these needs can all be met within our lives. In the reading, Schwartz states that when we make decisions, we can become satisfied. Also contradictory, he states that, in time, the consumer will become less satisfied with decisions they have made, even if the decision has met expectations. The Paradox of Choice has multiple points that can be considered the big take aways. First, choosing is not an easy procedure in daily life. The consumer must learn to be careful and choose strategically. Second, when making decisions, one cannot expect to get maximum results. Sometimes settling for less is necessary. Finally, the decision maker must account for loss, and be prepared to experience negative results from some decisions.
Part …show more content…

The first part highlighted choices that individuals must make on a daily basis. I do not agree with this. Any book will become outdated. I believe the first part of the book served the intended purpose. It showed a variety of examples that related to the evidence presented. The only communication principle that we discussed in class addressed by the reviewer was the use of social media. Joly states that she believed three calls to action were the greatest points to take away from the reading. She gathered that Schwartz’s message was overall geared to inform us to choose when to choose, satisfice more and maximize less, and learn to love constraints. I agree with the take aways she chose to mention. Although, I do believe there was one more major take away. Schwartz mentioned that we should regret less when we make decisions. A great portion of the reading was focused on regret, and it plays one of the largest roles in decision

Open Document