Throughout your life starting from when you were a child you have experienced different point of views from watching and listening to people. Whether you realize it or not what you have experience has shaped you into the person you are today. The two short stories “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin and the essay “Hook Ups Starve the Soul” by Laura Vanderkam, are examples of how precedents can influence individuals decisions. These three texts reveal this concept by showing how individuals can be influenced by the actions that people are doing around them, by traditions that were set by past civilians, as well as following any previous examples set by family members. By showing the …show more content…
Le Guin showcase how traditions set by past civilians influence traditions. In the short story by Jackson, she said that “No one liked to upset even as much tradition as was represented by the black box” (Jackson 1239). This was said after someone had suggested building a new box for use in the lottery. The box had been rebuilt in the past but it was rebuild with some of the parts of the old box showing how much it meant to the people that event stays the same. In the other short story by Le Guin, when explaining the way the citizens of Omelas think about the child she said “They all know it has to be there” (Le Guin 1318). Although they may not be okay with what was happening to the child, they have learned over the years that they should let it happen because it helps the community. In both texts individuals decide not to try and force any change to a tradition. When a old man standing in the crowd at the lottery overheard some people talking about other civilizations not having a lottery he said “There’s always been a lottery” (Jackson 1241). This man had been around for his fair share of lotteries and had gotten so use to them that he could fathom not having one. Similarly, when Le Guin was describing the characteristics of the people in Omelas she said “One thing I know there is none of in Omelas is guilt” (Le Guin 1317). Even though all of the citizens know that …show more content…
In the essay by Vanderkam, she says that hook ups “have all but replaced dating at most colleges” (Vanderkam 345). Some support that she uses when proving this was that she said “only half of the women .. had been on six or more dates...a third had been on no more than two” (Vanderkam 345). This shows that this is not just some fad that some kids at colleges are trying to start but rather it is something that is already implemented and has affected most college students. In the short story, Jackson was explaining how all of the citizens were coming together for the lottery when she said “The other boys soon followed his example” after she had saw one boy who had picked up some stones on the way to the lottery. Later in the day after the selection process of the lottery had been completed a person from the crowd yelled “Come on, come on, everyone” (Jackson 1243). Both of these quotes show how quickly the citizens are to listen to and follow the actions of other people. These qualities have even been taught to the children. These two texts show how people are quick to follow the lead of another and that stems down to the younger generation which means that the trait of following will only continue to grow. Also in the essay, Vanderkam said that hook ups have “pervade[d] college culture” (345). This shows
Almost all books have dozens of themes and elements in play that are open to interpretation, but a skillful reader will often be able to pull out a common theme between many different writers and their stories. Although they have very different plots with vastly different characters, a shared idea is cleverly intertwined by the authors of the following stories. “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut narrates a world where no one is allowed to excel in anything, everyone is made equal by scarring natural advantages such as beauty or intelligence, and the government imposes this austerely. “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson shows the story of a town preparing to conduct an age-old barbaric tradition, even though the reasons for the tradition are neither unknown, nor beneficial. The townspeople are determined and compelled, to follow this ritual through. The poem “Harlem,” by Langston Hughes, a profound statement about what happens to dreams when they are put on hold. “Harrison Bergeron”, “The Lottery”, and “Harlem” all share a common subject which is the danger and the burden of conformity is this: If an unjust system prevails with the support of the masses, the tyranny by the majority rules.
In comparing and contrasting the short stories “Everyday Use” written by Alice Walker and “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson, tradition is carried on throughout the generations. Symbols are often used in these short stories to convey these messages of tradition and heritage. Rebellious characters are also found in both of the stories, trying to alter traditions to meet their own personal expectations. However, in contrast “The Lottery” is a much more barbaric story that does not reveal the cruelty until the end of the story. The story involves an entire village of families following a tradition. “Everyday Use” is not as tragic, it deals with a conflict within a single family unit.
Please, Protect the Omelas. The Ones Who Walk Away From The Omelas by Ursula K. Le Guin, made in October 1973. Long story short, this story is about this amazing city where there is no guilt, no pain, wise people and strong athletes. What could possibly go wrong? Well, there is one person in the city of thousands of joyful citizens that does not feel the happiness of the others.
The people of a small village in New england practiced a very deadly tradition. Every year they would participate in what was called the lottery, Every adult would randomly select a white piece of paper from an old black box and hope that it was not marked with a black dot, for there was no money at the end of this lottery rather death awaited the unlucky drawer. The victim would be stoned by everyone in the village until they died. This tradition had been carried out for years, generation after generation countless people would be wrongfully stoned to death and the only explanation for this inhumane activity was “It 's what we’ve always done”. “The original paraphernalia for the lottery had been lost long ago … no one liked to upset even as much tradition as was represented by the black box” (Jackson), It was almost as if the people of this village were afraid of change, afraid that is would somehow disturbed the atmosphere and upset their great ancestors, it was almost as if the lottery was their sacrificial offering to maintain peace within themselves. The idea of groupthink was missing in the story, no form of communication was made concerning this absurd tradition, those who tried to bring it were disregarded, this supports the dictatorship side of groupthink, the one where only one person (the mayor) would speak and everyone else would obey without
People with power in society often have the ability to influence the practice of certain traditions. These traditions can affect what a citizen is entitled to do. In today's day and age, life without basic freedoms and rights sounds unthinkable. However, in Shirley Jackson's “The Lottery” and Kurt Vonnegut's “Harrison Bergeron” this is the reality. Old Man Warner and the Handicapper General show that people in positions of authority encourage outdated traditions that ultimately lead to innocent people getting hurt.
Affirmative action is perhaps the political hot potato of the decade. Its divisiveness has escalated racial tensions all across the nation, in forums political and academic. It also creates problems on a daily basis for millions of Americans in the workforce, education, housing, and so forth. Affirmative action, by its very definition, uses discrimination to attempt to create equality. Its ultimate goal is to make everyone equal to everyone else- intellectually, ability-wise, and (dare I say?) socially. What the proponents of this racial and gender communism do not realize is that society can only function in the absence of complete equality. Society is always in need of someone - be it a nationality, religion, or gender - to look down on. This point is most clearly made in the short story Those Who Walk Away From Omelas, a 1973 work by Ursula K. Leguin. The central message of Omelas is that society needs a pariah- someone to look down on in order to maintain its own happiness.
What would happen if an utopia wasn’t all that perfect on the inside? Judging by just the appearance of something may lead to a situation of regret and confusion.” The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson address the theme of religious and traditional symbolism.” The Lottery” demonstrates how something that seems so perfect on the outside isn’t all that great on the inside.
At a time where the future has never looked brighter, it is baffling how some people have become more pessimistic than ever. Why do people who are faced with traumatizing situations always seem to focus on the negatives? Why is it that when people are faced with despair, they always seem to rely on how the situation looks repugnant? Science fiction stories have a tendence to show all these questioning thoughts. There are many key details in the science fiction short story book titled Masterpieces: The Best Science Fiction of the Twentieth Century that shows pessimism and has a negative tendency of expecting the worst from life and how people treat each other. This is certainly shown in the acts of communication, isolation, and hopelessness.
In “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, there are certain traditions that are upheld by the characters in the story. These characters that Jackson created are not even sure why they are following the traditions. This story shows the reader how mankind will react to different situations that they are put into. Even when something is going bad or is wrong, people will not be a leader and stop it. The characters in this story should not have tolerated with the inhumane tradition that was held every year.
Humans will always make mistakes. It is important that we learn from them and avoid making more in the future. In The Lottery, an old town tradition forces the town residents to sacrifice the person whose name is chosen from the black box. In Hills like White Elephants, a man and his wife discuss whether or not the woman should get an abortion. Both of these short stories lead to the idea that old traditions aren’t always right. Was bringing Africans to America to be slaves a just policy? Was kicking Indians off of their homeland to walk the Trail of Tears right? Both The Lottery and Hills like White Elephants look at some of man’s wrongs and present some solutions on how to fix them.
Le Guin 's story centers around a place where the people find themselves happy and having a joyous life. These people do not suffer. Through the story, the reader comes to find out that there is a child locked away under the city of Omelas. So, this child 's suffering is what fuels this idealistic happiness the people get to experience.
Some traditions are passed down through generations. In a short story, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, a specific tradition is passed down to every generation. This generation was hated by most of the towns people ; those people said the tradition was an unfair and injustice act. Another act if injustice happened in Elie Wiesel’s short story “Hope, Despair, and Memory”. This quite from Elie Wiesel’s story shows how we must look at the unfairness. “Mankind must remember that peace is not God’s gift to his creatures, it is our gift to each other.” The short story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson supports Wiesel’s central idea in “Hope, Despair, and Memory” by conveying similar central ideas with their use of pathos, the character’s perspective,
Mankind tends to accept and follow old traditions without understanding or questioning the real meaning and benefits of it. “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut depict dystopian societies where the population blindly accept their way of life and follow traditions under the fear of punishments of Gods and governments. “The Lottery” illustrates a village that holds an annual event to randomly choose one of its inhabitants to be stoned to death as a tribute to have a good crop and maintain the order of their community. Vonnegut depicts the United States in the year of 2081 where people were made equal in all possible ways due to the Amendments to the constitution, with use of devices to weaken the population abilities to think and move, strictly enforced by government officials. The major similarity between both stories is cruelty being normalized in both societies. Differences can also be found in both stories, the villagers’ Blind acceptance to a tradition in “The Lottery”, and freedom of thought. While in “Harrison Bergeron” the population was forced to obey the rules and forbidden to think or rebel against the government.
In Ursula Le Guin's short story, "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas," an idealistic town is delineated where everybody lives in a consistent condition of joy. Le Guin stresses that these people are not simple or ignorant, yet they are never afflicted with the worry and distress common in the real world. However, the utopian nature of the town and its prosperity depend on the miserable condition of one small child. This child lives alone in a little closet, deprived of love and understanding. Physically, the child is undernourished, and is constantly hungry. Every inhabitant of Omelas is required to see the child at one point, usually during their early teenage years, and know of its miserable existence. And, the people know that their utopia
In "The Lottery" Shirley Jackson fills her story with many literary elements to mask the evil. The story demonstrates how it is in human nature to blindly follow traditions. Even if the people have no idea why they follow.