The New Renaissance Analysis

1105 Words3 Pages

In recent years, threats to the global environment have only become worse. We see natural disasters striking one right after the other and climate change, pollution, destruction of biodiversity, deforestation and much more, even the threat of nuclear war becoming a problem every day. In “The New Renaissance,” Daniel Quinn (2002) claims that a second renaissance is coming; a renaissance where people will either learn to live sustainably or they will not. Quinn also stated that if humans continue living the way they do- they will become extinct in the next 200 years. Nowadays, we are faced with the biggest threat to our survival, global warming, that is why we should take the necessary steps such as to reduce fossil fuel, plant trees, conserve water, reduce waste and aim for carbon neutrality and educate people on the sustainable use of biodiversity so that we may sustain our survival.
Melting glaciers, rising sea levels, dying forests, scrambling wildlife, and …show more content…

“Maintaining a population of six billion humans costs the world 200 species a day. If this were something that was going to stop next week or next month that would be okay. But the unfortunate fact is that it's not. It's something that's going to go on happening every day, day after day after day—and that's what makes it unsustainable. That kind of cataclysmic destruction cannot be sustained,” (Quinn, 2002). Quinn goes on to say how thinking that those 200 or more species are below humans is very dangerous and that is how humanity will go extinct. We cannot leave this problem for the younger generations; it needs to start with us, we need to take the steps in preserving the biomasses and take the steps that lead to carbon neutrality so that we can reduce the effects of climate change for our younger

Open Document