The Narrator In David Foster Wallace's Short Story 'Good Old Neon'

1616 Words4 Pages

In the opening lines of David Foster Wallace’s short story, “Good Old Neon,” the protagonist and narrator Neal describes himself as follows: “My whole life I’ve been a fraud. I’m not exaggerating. Pretty much all I’ve ever done all the time is try to create a certain impression of me in other people” (141). In saying this, Neal sets up a self-aware yet self-deprecating representation of himself. Seemingly, Neal (who is a ghost in “Good Old Neon”) understands his hamartia, or tragic flaw, as inauthenticity. However, a closer reading of Neal’s choice of language shows that he is an unreliable narrator. In fact, he is intentionally unreliable as a narrator because he wants to “come across someone who is [his] match and can’t be fooled.” In other …show more content…

Repeatedly, Neal insists that his sentiments are “long, rushing, and clumsy” so as “to convey the way I remember it,” or portray his narrative authentically (148, 150). Repetition of this explanation, coupled with an appeal to the reader to sympathize with his ramblings—“I know that you know as well as I do how fast thoughts and associations can fly through your head”—could give Neal credibility and reinforce his self-aware yet self-deprecating characterization (150). In contrast, another reading of Neal’s reiterated explanations of his garrulousness, coupled with his appeal, is that he is overcompensating to come off as honest. But he is deliberately overdoing it to the extent that he exposes himself as an imposter. As such, Neal is testing whether the reader can tell that he is overcompensating. In support of this point, the way that the appeal begins, “I know that know you as well as I do,” has an exaggerated or overstated tone (150). Overcompensation is also reflected in Neal’s overuse of tangential parenthetical remarks, some of them half a page or more in length. Overcompensation is further manifested in the content of the remarks themselves. In one case, Neal begins, “To be honest, I knew it was Cézanne because . . .” (146). Parentheticals “are said while one is …show more content…

It comes up when Neal says, “I more or less conned myself into sticking with going to see Dr. G. … for almost nine months” (164). By saying “nine months,” Neal is evoking the image of pregnancy. Neal is metaphorically pregnant; like an expectant mother, Neal is carrying an interior self within an exterior self. However, for Neal, this interior self is one of fraudulence and insincerity – which he wants the reader to identify – beneath an exterior façade of a self-aware yet self-deprecating character. This pregnancy imagery is fleshed out by Neal referring to Dr. Gustafson in this sentence as “Dr. G.,” which alludes to a doctor of gynecology

Open Document