Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Culture appropriation affects society
Essay on cultural appropriation
Essay on cultural appropriation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Culture appropriation affects society
In our modern world of art there are so many different ways to portray a message to the viewer, including the method of cultural appropriation. Cultural Appropriation is described as when people from one culture use and adapt traditions from another culture. This is common in society that a dominant culture appropriates a sub-dominant culture. The ap-propriated culture is mimicked by the dominant culture, and this can be in many ways from symbolism use to traditional clothing use. Yet some artists aspire to use cultural appropria-tion in the form of a political statement to portray their message. A political artwork using cultural appropriation in a way that evokes emotion and thoughts as manner to portray the artists beliefs is an artwork …show more content…
The whitewashing of the statue gives it a more european appearance (as the Congo was christianised by Europe), removing the true african appearance and refer-ring to the colonisation of Africa. Geers referred to the pouring of ink over the sculpture as “baptising” the sculpture with “words that cannot be read” as writing is a european tradition unknown to the native africans who have a more oral tradition. The artwork contains a lot of violence. There is the spiritual violence of the nails nailed into the statue in order for the people to communicate with their ancestors/gods. There is also the violence of the gesso primer taking away the african feel of the statue, destroying these spirits and their …show more content…
The postcards were not old, historically rare images but they were re-productions for global distribution; selling as originals. This once pure culture has now be-come a marketing point. The “whitening” can also be a signifier for the lost innocence of this culture.
Another series of artworks implementing appropriation done by Candice Breitz in 1997 is Painting By Numbers. She approaches a different view on the artist-gallery relationship, where galleries push artists to finish their artworks in order to simply sell them to the public as soon as possible. An art gallery in New York asked Breitz to do a personal series of artworks for them, and she accepted with one condition. Daniel Silverstein, the gallery di-rector, would have to produce all the paintings of the exhibition.
Breitz handed Silverstein brushes, paint and canvases with popular brandnames and log-os traced onto them in linear templates with colour swatches. The brandnames she appro-priated included companies such as Coca Cola, McDonald’s and Marlboro. All companies that had great marketing power an were widely popular in the current western
As people, like myself, who aren’t oppressed for their skin color, culture, or religion, it’s hard to sometimes understand what it feels like to have someone appropriate their livelihood, more specifically, someone who is appropriating someone else’s culture. I imagine it, on a much smaller scale, to be like doing a group project, but one is doing all the work and the others take all the credit. The result would be one not receiving any of the rewards. People would call them “creative” and “hard-working”, when in reality, they just showed up and didn’t contribute anything at all. Amy Stretten’s “Appropriating Native American Imagery Honors No One” provides a multitude of resources that go along with her main point of why appropriating the Native
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
Through various motifs, themes and mediums, the visual art of the Chicano movement addressed issues of intolerance, racism, marginalization and discrimination. By re-interpreting traditional art of Mexico, accessing the culture of their pre-Columbian ancestors, creating strong local communities, and directly addressing controversial economic and political issues, artists involved in the movement recognized the need for visual imagery that embodied the political efforts of Mexican-American immigrants and citizens who fought and continue to fight for racial and cultural acceptance, recognition and representation.
Our progressive society is accompanied by two concepts that the population has the tendency to confuse: cultural appropriation versus cultural appreciation. In layman's terms, cultural appropriation continues to disenfranchise a group; in contrast, appreciation which shows respect for the culture. An example of appropriating culture would be when an individual would get a tattoo of Asian script because “it looked cool” for an “aesthetic” when they have no clue as to its
...on their market value, has become the substitute for what paintings lost when the camera made them reproducible” (146). Confirming Berger’s argument, when I viewed this piece of art, I was amazed by it. It invited me in and I spent a long period of time looking at, and looking into it. Although the environment of the museum added to my experience of viewing the artwork, if the original painting had looked as vibrant and colorful as the reproduction, the painting would have been even more intriguing. If I had seen the reproduction first, I know that I would not have been pulled into this piece of art.
In our new age, social media-strained society, you will find different artists expressing their ideas on a controversial topic. One of the controversial topics is Cultural Appropriation. Cultural Appropriation is a “sociological concept which views the adoption of the use of elements of one culture by members of a different culture as a largely negative phenomenon (James Young).” Consequently, many see it as an appreciation of a culture, while others feel it is a degradation of one. However, cultural appropriation should not be used as fashion, or blatant ignorance without knowledge of the culture first hand.
“Cultural resistance is the practice of using meanings and symbols, that is, culture, to contest and combat a dominant power, often constructing a different vision of the world in the process.” (Duncombe 1) Cultural resistance can be expressed in a multitude of ways to convey the oppression and injustice that people at times fail to recognize. Significance through art is a way for cultural resistance to blossom and in turn bring awareness to the importance of the cause. The famous phrase out of sight and out of mind is a perfect example as to why cultural resistance is needed. It is easy to be unaware of something that hasn’t been brought to your attention.
Texts are political. Political in the sense that they produce messages that carry specific ideas and beliefs targeted toward a certain thinking body of people. A familiar phrase in America is, “art imitates life.” It defines life as essential to art, but can we say the reverse? Could life imitate art? The semantics of the phrase seem too ambiguous for such a statement. What is the definition of art, of life? The phrase suggests that art reinforces cultural and social beliefs by using the verb imitate. If art imitates life, then life imitates art. The verb is reflexive and positioned in the middle of the two words it is reflecting. It is true then, the language speaks for itself, and this political statement can be used as a tool to find the underlying cultural belief within a text.
There seems to be the overarching idea of whether an artist should focus on creating their own work, or if they should use their work to aid their surrounding community in some way. At times, using art for social activism can cause controversy. It may be that the artist could never depict perfect activism in their art, and that it may never please every viewer. However, it may not be that all art as activism should be avoided. If there were none of these works, critical conversations may have never begun. In fact, it might be good that this style of art does not please everyone. If this is the case, then those who view the art are more likely to talk about the subject at hand instead of going about their day and ignoring the problem at
The use of art forms and sculpture as a means of conveying a message to its viewers has been rooted deep into culture throughout human history. Imagery has carved political views and depictions of society’s circumstances into permanent marks of antiquity. From the Ancient Roman architecture and sculpture to the 1900’s emergence of media in politics, we have continued to express our views, hardships, and culture in permanent ways, and use art as an intricate form of manipulation and persuasion. In the ancient times, the Romans used sculpture to portray individuals of power, such as Augustus, to mark a political ideology by making powerful figures look more pristine and perfect on a godly level. They would portray the unattainable perfection
Cultural appropriation is starting to largely affect today’s society. Recently in Illinois, a college campus has been the center of a large cultural appropriation debate from
As society changes, issues emerge or evolve from pre-existing controversies. However, the underlying problem often remains the same. Cultural appropriation is one of the many social injustices that has been shaped by the change of society, but continues to exist today as a result of a similar set of issues found throughout history. In the past, appropriation attacked explicit crimes such as blackfacing or ethnological expositions (eg. forcing Natives into cages for display) (Cathy, 2015); however, in modern day, appropriation is not as clear and definite. Today, much of the criticisms are directed towards artists who have touched upon a culture other than their own, despite how knowledgeable and
If an artist needs to appropriate found or ready-made objects, contemporary images or historical images to help in conveying his or her feelings, then so be it. Appropriation in art is here to stay. Bibliography:.. Coplans, John. The.. Andy Warhol.
The “privileged minority” mystifies works of art in order to control people’s view. Berger explains how Hals becomes after he painted the two paintings. According to Berger, “he obtained three loads of peat on public charity, otherwise he would have frozen to death. Those who now sat for him were administrators of such public charity” (158).
Human’s have always struggled to express themselves. Art, is considered by many to be the ultimate form of human expression. Many assume that art has a definition, but this is not the case. Art, it can be said, is “in the eye of the beholder.” This simply means that what you consider art, someone else would not. Art is part of a person’s internal emotions, which signifies why different people see art as different things. Every type of culture and era presents distinctive and unique characteristics. Different cultures all have different views of what art can, and would be, causing art itself to be universally renowned throughout the world.