The Legal Requirements for Making a Will
A will is a formal declaration by a person of what they want to happen
to their property or estate when they die. Wills do not take effect
until the person whom it is written by dies. It is possible to make
alterations or even completely changed as many times as a person feels
necessary. But the law only recognises the final most recent will
produced by a person.
If a will is complicated or not straightforward to the person making
it, it is sensible to get legal advice on the wording of the will.
Though a will does not have to be complicated. It is acceptable to
state 'All to Mother'. No particular words are needed as long as the
will is straightforward. You can buy a standard form for a will from a
stationer.
A man making a will is know as a testator and a women, testatrix.
There are laws that show there are certain rules that must be followed
in order to make a valid will.
To make a valid will the testator or testatrix must be at least 18
years of age, of sound mind and acting of their own free will. The
formalities of making a will are set out in the Will Act 1837 as
amended by the administration of Justice Act 1982, these are, the will
must be written. The will must be signed by the testator or another
person in the presence of the testator and at his direction, the
signature can be any where on the will, the signature or mark must be
made or acknowledged in the presence of at least two witnesses who are
present at the same time, the witnesses must be competent, the
witnesses can not benefit from the will.
There are exceptions to these rules and this is called a privileged...
... middle of paper ...
...person
benefiting there is a problem. I think this law should be updated or
include anyone who has been relying on the deceased can make a claim
on the deceased estate if it is what the deceased would want.
The law was made many years ago and was based upon how people lived at
that time, which may explain why some people cannot make a claim on
wills. When they made laws regarding wills certain situations were
very uncommon so it did not seem necessary to include them in the
justice system. But at present laws are being updated and improved, so
perhaps now will need to be amended so every one who deserves to make
a claim on a will is accommodated. Overall without some exceptions the
law is adequate on allowing someone to make a claim on the estate of a
deceased person if he or she has not been adequately provided for.
Case name: Peter K. Dementas v The Estate of Jack Tallas, 764 P.2d 628 (1988)
legislation was dropped by the act. In 1927, it became forbidden for any person to raise
olds who now had to go to school because the government had made a law
...ens. Over time, due of the vast exploitation of these loophole, the law did not hold up and decayed; which proved to be an almost prophetic miniaturization of the declined of the national prohibition law over eighty years later.
charitable bequest in their wills — even though no nonpro fit has asked them to do so.This leaves
laws. I wish that they would let these people sleep on the floor or something
FIRST: I direct that the expenses of my last illness and funeral, the expenses of the administration of my estate, and all estate, inheritance and similar taxes payable with respect to property included in my estate, whether or not passing under this will, and any interest or penalties thereon, shall be paid out of my residuary estate, without apportionment and with no right of reimbursement from any recipient of any such.
The main reason that this law was put into place was because there were no regulations regarding food health and safety. There were also market failures due to the lack of food regulations, because the public could not tell if a certain food product had been altered in any way. Also many food markets completely neglected the environment, due to no set standard for environmental protection.
provided that a wife must get a third of her husband's estate, even when he
Palmer, the defendant, claimed that he has the right to the property according to the law because he was named the heir in the will (Riggs v Palmer). The plaintiffs, Mrs. Riggs and Mrs. Preston, however brought this action before the court to fight against this will, for they believed that Palmer should no longer be entitled to the property, which he so wrongfully gained. The objective of the statute is to address issues concerning wills so that testators could carry out their final wishes by passing their property off to their loved ones (Riggs v Palmer). This fact is what gave rise to different arguments from the majority to the dissenting judges. The issues were how to interpret the law rationally, and whether Palmer, who murdered his grandfather should be entitled to the property. The judges believed that although the law at that time did not address the issue of what would happen to the property in the event that the heir murdered the testator, to allow such a thing would never be the intention of legislators (Riggs v Palmer). Had legislators ever
will is making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances such as fate or divine
In the case Thomas v. Thomas [1842] QB 851, after John Thomas death, the executors of his estate entered into an agreement with P that P can occupy the house by paying£1 per year. However after P live in the house for some time, D refused to convey the house and claimed that there was no consideration for his promise. It was held that P pay £1 per year is consideration and need not to be adequate.
Lewinson LJ remarked : “I echo the judge’s view that it is plainly undesirable that beneficiaries should be permitted to execute a will in their own favour in any capacity; and that Parliament should consider a change in the law to ensure that this cannot happen in the future”.
The word or concept “pot luck” can often be used as a literary device and is rarely used in esteemed, memorable literature. The term pot luck dates all the way back to times when Shakespeare was actively writing. The first documented use of the word was by the author, Thomas Nashe. His use of the word makes its first appearance in the play Summers Last Will and Testament, “Because you are my countrymen and so forth; and a good fellow, is a good fellow, though he have never a penny in his purse. We had but even pot-luck, a little to moisten our lips, and no more.” (Nashe 1508).This use of the term is very different from today’s understanding and connotations.
The greatest and wisest of philosophers and historians once knew of a story that is filled with mystery and curiosity. It has been said, that several centuries before present time, a community flourished in what is now the Philippines. The place was like those that you would see in films that featured the ancient times - festivals full of arts and music, peasants and farmers working with utmost passion, denizens swaying to beats with drunken revelries. Innovation and progress developed in the land without bound. Though the pre-colonial Philippines lived in the most simple of ways, it was a community of unlimited potential. The other merchants and communities several seas away heard of the the unparalleled glory of this mighty land and even thought that it would go on to form eons of existence.