Is there anything common between the three paintings? Which was the main stream that influenced the artists? Were there any differences in the three styles and can we say if one is better than the other? A small comparison to the following masterpieces will resolve our all questions.
Paul Cézanne was a post impressionist who used little of the nineteenth century’s methods. His painting of the Last Bathers was based on the Renaissance period, (Khan Academy,n.d) and on Titian’s work that inspired him to create that work. What the painting depicts, apart from the natural scenery, is the embodiment of human shape in such a way that all elements like trees, water rocks, women bodies become parts of an architectural composition, expressed in symmetrical and parallel rhythms. (Roubeka, 2016)
The use of the human body in paintings was basically a mean to convey ideas and emotions. In “Large Bathers’ we actually watch a scene composed of the background (the bank of a lake, trees and two shapes an animal and a human that moving away) and the foreground, figures of naked women enjoying the lake. (Artble,n.d)
…show more content…
We can say that “Joy of Life”, is similar to the “Large Bathers” in the way that both artists present the scenery. The both have implied a triangle in the middle of the painting, highlighting mostly the foreground through a scene that resembles a theatrical stage. The “Joy of Life” though, has vivid and bright colours, without contours. The nude women in the painting appeared to be relaxed and happy, which refers to that way that he fantasies paradise. (Khan
In the Florence and the early renaissance, we have the greatest master of art like Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Sandro Botticelli and others. In this period of time the painters almost never show their emotions or feelings, they were more focused on indulging the churches and the wealthy people. In The renaissance period the art provides the work of art with ideal, intangible qualities, giving it a beauty and significance greater and more permanent than that actually found in the modern art. Florence and the early renaissance, the art become very valued where every artist was trying to create art forms consistent with the appearance of the beauty or elegance in a natural perspective. However, Renaissance art seems to focus more on the human as an individual, while Wayne White art takes a broader picture with no humans whatsoever; Wayne, modern three dimensional arts often utilizes a style of painting more abstract than Renaissance art. At this point in the semester these two aspects of abstract painting and the early renaissance artwork have significant roles in the paintings. Wayne White brings unrealistic concepts that provoke a new theme of art, but nevertheless the artistic creations of the piece of art during early renaissance still represent the highest of attainment in the history of
are depicted with the same degree of variation. To understand such a diverse set of paintings –
The composition of this painting forces the eye to the woman, and specifically to her face. Although the white wedding dress is large and takes up most of the woman’s figure, the white contrasts with her face and dark hair, forcing the viewer to look more closely into the woman’s face. She smokes a cigarette and rests her chin on her hands. She does not appear to be a very young woman and her eyes are cast down and seem sad. In general, her face appears to show a sense of disillusionment with life and specifically with her own life. Although this is apparently her wedding day, she does not seem to be happy.
Here we also get to know that he is immortal and how he is not pleased with the painting he is obligated to paint. The painter also responds sorrowfully to the title of the mural, “The Happy Garden Of Life”, this shows us how the painter is also aware of the fact that it does not resemble the world they live in, so it is a metaphor for the world they live in. During the story we could also see how the painter does not share the same mindset as the others, for instance the meaning of life. This could be substantiated through the following quotation:
As far as the human body is on the real and the anatomical features it fails to give an Idea of the human body in depth but an idea nonetheless. The painting in general is very proportional and in a way the people are proportional as a whole to the center; Jesus Christ. The main body part that seems to alwa...
The painting express creative drive that they give form to immaterial ideas and feelings (this is relevant to abstract art). Since the author had mental health issues during the creative process of the painting I believe, he didn’t just used art and beauty themes to express his paintings, he wanted to show the world what he was feeling inside. Although, many people can view this painting’s major theme as Art and Beauty, I also viewed it as Art and Spiritual Belief. The reason why is because according to Sayre, Gogh wrote a letter to his brother by saying: “My paintings are almost a cry of anguish.” Gogh utilized a variety of colors on the spectrum, giving his paintings life. He often used the art style of Impressionists in that his paintings are depicted as he sees fit, and not how they are naturally viewed. His heavy brushstrokes and vivid colors portray the night sky as crazy and chaotic and the village below as peaceful and
In his life, Vermeer painted in two distinct styles: the first style (from 1653-1664) was characterized by brilliant use of color and an aggressive painting technique, whereas the second style was smoother and more refined with pale and softer colors. In other words, his style moved from one more characterized by a more masculine vigor to one of refined delicate subtlety. What remained throughout both styles was his exquisite combination of color and precision that harmonized figures and space.
Impressionism is very pretty and complicated. It was from 1860 to 1910. Monet is the perfect Impressionist. Impressionism had its basic tenants. Their subject matter was the middle upper class, the city, and leisurely activities. They painted on en plein air which means they painted outdoors. They painted in snow, rain, storm, just in order to record directly the effects of light and atmosphere. They painted with strokes and touches of pure color by using a great deal of white and rarely black. They recorded the shifting play of light on the surface of objects and the effect light has on the eye without concern for the physicality of the object being painted. They were influenced by Japanese art and photography. One of Monet’s works is titled Water Lilies. The medium of this work is oil on canvas. Monet is an impressionist. He puts up pure color just describe the water. He said, when you go out paint, the impression of the scene not the exact scene.
Ingres' and Manet both painted very similar pieces in terms of medium, position of the women, and the fact that the women stare at their audience. However their varying styles, art periods, and the tones of the pieces set them apart from each other and from other similar pieces in
The masculine and idealized form of the human body is an ever-present characteristic of Michelangelo’s sculpture. Many people over the years have speculated why this may be, but there has never been a definitive answer, and probably never will be. Through all of his sculpture there is a distinct classical influence, with both his subject matter and his inclination to artistically create something beautiful. In most cases, for Michelangelo, this means the idealized human figure, seeping with contraposto. This revival of classical influences is common for a Renaissance artisan, but the new, exaggerated form of the human body is new and unique to Michelangelo’s artistic style.
The renaissance art was very different from the medieval art since the renaissance art brought back the human interest of art. I have always found to be surprising that some of the most famous artwork is of naked humans. I also find to be strange as well. Since there are so many things paint or to make sculptures about, this makes me wonders why would artist pick humans and especially naked humans? Sure humans are an interesting thing to make or paint about, however, why not do something of a kingdom, a war, a battle, and even an animal. There are so many things that artist can make, but why to make the focus of the renaissance art of naked humans. However, many tourists around the world will visit these famous these masterpieces work when they are visiting the countries they were created. For instance, the statue of David, which is located in Florence, Italy, was created during the renaissance and it was one of Michelangelo finest work. I have had the pleasure of being able to see the fascinating sculpture in person. At first, I thought it was no big deal. However, when I actually saw for the first time in person my reaction was just. “Wow… I never see anything like. It was incredible”. I also asked myself, “How did he do that? What gave him the inspiration to create such a sculpture? How has it stayed up this long?” I was impressed and usually, I am not impressed by art. It was just
Although both artists are of the Impressionist Movement, Degas and Monet started on very contrary bases in their approach to their production of painting and such. However, Monet influenced Degas into adapting his art to fit it into the Impressionist stereotype. Degas’ influence over Monet was minimal to non-existent putting aside his decision to add other colours to his palette. Since Monet was the leader of the Impressionists, this can be expected. If extensively examined, Degas’ later works and Monet’s works can be comparable; if not approach or style then in paint and pastel application.
Social reformer, Henry Ward Beecher, once said “Every artist dips his brush in his own soul, and paints his own nature into his pictures.” This quote is perfect because it shows how no two artists can ever be the same, like my two artists for example, Georges-Pierre Seurat (1859-1891) and Claude Monet (1840-1926). Both Seurat and Monet were impressionist European painters however they’re style and technique were very different. One painting Seurat is known for is A Sunday on La Grande Jatte (1884-1886). Monet on the other hand is known for many different works of art, but La Grenouillere (1869) is one of his bests.
One of the visual elements of this painting is the color he really uses the color to get people's attention because he uses watercolors to blend them together to make such a wonderful painting. He blends many different colors together to make new ones there is not a spot in this painting that there isn’t color. The second visual element is the people in the painting they are naked and dancing around like nobody's looking. The people in the painting are relaxing and enjoying one another and various ways. Some are even having sexual contact in the painting it’s expressing themselves from one to
The Web. 28 Jan. 2014. Info please. Infoplease, n.d. -. Web.