The Importance Of Public Speaking Speech

1007 Words3 Pages

Every semester, The University of Georgia host the public speaking contest through the department of communication studies. This contest gives students the opportunity to display the all of public speaking techniques they’ve learned in class on the topic of their choice. Two of the speeches were very entertaining and enjoyable. Both of the speakers used appropriate evidence to back up their arguments and had charismatic personalities that appealed to the audience. However, one speech was very repetitive and included opinions more than facts and concrete evidence. Regardless of this, I learned a lot about public speaking – what to do and what not to do. One presentation that I thoroughly enjoyed was called “Government and private space programs …show more content…

He did not just make assertions without proof such as specific instances, statistics, or testimony. For example, Addison Hicks argued that “space is so vital to everything we do”. Then he supported this claim by stating that NASA spurs innovation and business growth, promotes collaboration and supports foreign policy, invests in technology and U.S. industry, and inspires people around the world. He not only said these statements but backed them up with statistics such as NASA has 500 agreements with 2/3 of the world (promotes collaboration and supports foreign policy) and that it has 15.8 million Twitter followers and that it has had over 1.5 million mentions in English language academic articles during the last decade (inspires people around the world). Hicks started his speech with a personal anecdote about his childhood - reminiscing about how he was obsessed with outer space as a young boy and developed a passion for the mysterious place. This engaged the audience immediately, both intellectually and …show more content…

It was called “The Scale-ias of Justice: Envisioning the future of Clarence Thomas” by Sidney Wright. In my opinion, his speech was ineffective due to his lack of clarity, lack of an argument, and countless repetition. Arguably, the most important part of a speech is the beginning. It sets the basis for the rest of the presentation. Unlike the other contestants, Wright did not start his speech off with a hook so the audience’s attention was not captured immediately. This made it harder for the audience to want to listen and harder for them to relate to his topic. He also repeated his opinions frequently with phrases such as “Justice Thomas is ready to fulfill his role” which decreased the validity of the presentation. Why was Justice Thomas ready to step into a new position? Why is this important? Who is Justice Thomas? After the presentation, I could not answer any of these questions. A good presenter should leave the audience with no questions

Open Document