Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
violence in the media
How does media influence culture and society
effects of television violence of children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: violence in the media
The Ideology of Media Blame
For generations the media has been unfairly seen as the catalyst of
violence and crime with in society. The Media, particularly television
and film have been blamed for many atrocities over the years; some of
these can be indirectly related to the media's involvement on people's
lives. But some cannot. As a Media and Psychology student I have
different views on the debate of media blame. As a psychologist I can
understand the connection with the media and violence, i.e. violence
is a behaviour, which in theory, is learnt and repeated on another.
Therefore this behaviour must derive from a source. Which it can be
argued, could be a media text. But as a media student I can
deconstruct a text and assign different theories to it. Such as the
encoding/decoding model. Stuart Hall and David Morley centred on the
idea that audiences vary in their response to media messages. This is
because they are influenced by their social position, gender, age,
ethnicity, and occupation and also life experience. Therefore an
individual will decode a media text in a different way to another.
Creating various interpretations of the same text (i.e. preferred
reading).
The American senate office has concluded that the media, in particular
television "…influences children perception of the values and
behaviour that are common and acceptable in society". A study carried
out by the U.S. Senate office and the F.C.C. (Federal Communication
Commission) on television and the effect it has on children noted, "…
Children exposed to violent programmes at a young age have a higher
tendency for violent and aggressive behaviour".
...
... middle of paper ...
...d to comprehend. But
in doing so we come one-step closer to understanding contemporary
sociological living.
Bibliography.
Film.
· 'Bowling For Columbine' directed by Michael Moore.
Books.
· 'Stupid white Men' author Michael Moore (2002
· 'The Lucifer Principle' author Howard Bloom (1995)
· 'The Freud Reader' edited by Peter Gay (1953)
· 'The Government and Politics of the United States' author Nigel
Bowles (1997
· 'Advanced Level Media' authors Angela Bell, Mark Joyce and Danny
Rivers (2000)
· 'Studying The Media' author Edward Arnold (1999)
· 'Mythologies' author Roland Barthes (1973)
· 'Pierre Bourdieu' author Richard Jenkins (1996)
· ' The Dictionary of Psychology' author Arthur S. Reber (1994)
· ' Psychology and Everyday life' author Karon Oliver (2001)
One of the major problems in the American media today is non-objective reporting which is also known as bias. This has been a trend since the early 1980?s and is very alarming for American citizens who watch the news for truth and honest reporting. Not only has bias been a problem in the broadcast media of ABC, NBC, and CBS, but it has also been a problem in mainstream newspapers such as The New York Times, The Sun, and The Boston Globe. For years, these media outlets have built their reputations on truth and now the trend is to lean left and not tell the whole story. Evidence of this has become very prominent in war coverage and election bias. Bias in the media is a big issue and causes lots of problems throughout the public such as losing trust in a once great source for news, people going elsewhere for information, being ill-informed, and leading to a low voter turnout.
According to John Davidson's essay Menace to Society, "three-quarters of Americans surveyed [are] convinced that movies, television and music spur young people to violence." While public opinion is strong, the results of research are divided on the effects of media violence on the youth in this country. Davidson wrote that most experts agree that some correlation between media violence and actual violent acts exists, yet the results are contradictory and researchers quibble about how the effects are to be measured (271). Moreover, Davidson is not convinced that the media is the sole problem of violence, or even a primary problem. He points out that other factors, such as "poverty, the easy accessibility of guns, domestic abuse, [and] social instability" may have a greater impact on a child becoming violent than the influence of the media (277). Even though other forces may be stronger, media violence does have some adverse effects on the members of society. If senseless violence on television and in movies had no effect, it would not be such a hotly debated topic. What type of effects and whom they affect are the most argued aspects of the discussion.
There is a "general consensus among social scientists that television violence increases the propensity to real-life aggression among some viewers," and yet, paradoxically, "there is presently little evidence indicating that violence enhances program popularity" (Diener & DeFour, 1978). Top government studies insist, "violent material is popular" (Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Behavior, 1972). Differing conclusions may be viable. One leading social psychologist flatly states, "evidence suggests that violence on television is potentially dangerous, in that it serves as a model for behavior -- especially for children" ...
Many Americans feel that the viewing of violence in the media reinforces negative behavior in society, especially among children and young adults. "Three thousand studies have been done since 1955 on the link between television and violence; 2,980 of them found a correlation between the two. We hear little about that because we get most of our news from television" (Peterson). With this much research one must acknowledge that there is a problem in America involving sex and violence in the media. We cannot blame all societal problems on the media and its portrayal of these issues, but we can become educated, ourselves, in order to better facilitate the healthy lives of our children.
Malcolm X once said “The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” In 1990, fifty-nine year old Delbert Ward was accused of killing his brother Bill Ward. Delbert was one of four brothers who lived on the family’s land operating a small farm producing milk from cows. During and after Delbert’s trial, loads of media preyed upon the ill-educated man and the village like vultures. Given his impoverished surroundings and his appearance, the media depicted Delbert as a salvage who killed his brother on the same bed that they shared for years. The documentary “Brother’s Keeper” investigated the truth behind the death of Bill Ward. It presents the argument that media manipulates public opinion. Media does manipulate public opinion using many techniques to influence the minds of the mass. The media’s effectiveness, level of bias present, and types of the media source used to portray information to determine how media influence public opinion, as well as address the opposing view to the argument.
“There is increasing evidence that early exposure to media violence is a contributing factor to the development of aggression” (Huesmann, Moise-Titus, Podolski, & Eron, 2003). Huesmann and Kirwil (2007, p. 545), argue that an individual’s aggression and violent behaviour are not only caused by emotional, mental and physical circumstances but also the environment plays an equally vital role. They further on state that hastening violent behaviour in the short-term sense is due to disclosure to violence, which can be either through media, computer games and violence that they observe at home, school and their social environment. This paper intends to comprehend media violence and its effects on humanity by understanding the issues that underlie the argument of whether the exposure of violence through the media does in fact contribute to ones likeliness to engage in violent and/or aggressive behaviour. In this essay, an evaluation will be made to determine the length of the effects of violent media in children and adults. Secondly an analysis will be made in terms of the conditioning that one experienced growing up, formerly a brief explanation of interpretation will be made and finally a conclusion will be made to determine whether exposure to media violence does indeed cause violent and/or aggressive behaviour in individuals.
Today it seems almost impossible to get a straightforward answer on any major topic from the media. All sources of media have a specific audience that they are intending to hear or view the information that they have prepared, therefore they will cut bits and pieces out so that only the message they are trying to get across will be received. So indeed there is a media bias, and yes it more often than not slants towards the liberal view point, as many reporters and journalists have liberal views themselves.
In the book, The Media and Foreign Policy, Simon Serfaty, Executive Director of the Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute in Washington, D. C., and research professor of American foreign policy at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced international Studies, shares his own and fellow authors collected essays on the media's effect on foreign policy and foreign policy decision making of the United States, if there is any. Serfaty has edited several books on foreign relations and foreign policies as well as authored many of his books and essays. His work has been primarily focused on foreign policy and foreign relations since the onset and ending of the "Cold War". In The Media and Foreign Policy, Serfaty brings together a collection of essays that defend the media's current and past role of reporting the United States' foreign policy decisions and relations.
Have you ever read an article and felt as if they didn't cover both sides of the story equally or they didn't cover one side at all? Thats media biased. News sources are often pushing their own political agendas. Journalist have the power to put out really what they want ‘’ Anyone with access to the Internet can be journalist now ‘’ ( McManus 31 ). . Fortunately there are ways to avoid this and find truths! It is important that everyday we have access to true and informational news. Due to bias in the media it is important to know how to find truths by fact checking and using the SMELL test.
Being biased is having a preference for one thing, usually in an unfair way. This is when someone has an one-sided opinion and does not have any room for considering alternative viewpoints. Views that are biased may be directed towards an individual, religion, political party, social class, nation, species, or any other distinct group. Biased acts may be expressed in many forms, but the most common is in the mass media. The media use this based on the perception of the producer or reporter within the media in the events that are being personally covered. When media bias is present in a news source, it is using a prejudiced approach and is leading to leaving out important sections of the whole truth. The source chooses to leave out these facts just because it does not support the message that corresponds to
... point blame) toward the violence on television (fictional) rather than the real violence being shown on news programs or documentaries. “Another argument is that the very idea of media agenda setting is the result of conservative ideology and paranoia” (Freeman, 4).
In conclusion it is clear that the mass media is one of the main ways
Furthermore, television violence causes aggressive behavior in children. Many people believe that children who watch violent television programs exhibit more aggressive behavior than that exhibited by children who do not (Kinnear 23). According to the results of many studies and reports, violence on television can lead to aggressive behavior in children (Langone 50). Also, when television was introduced into a community of children for the first time, researchers observed a rise in the level of physical and verbal aggression among these children (Langone 51). The more television violence viewed by a child, the more aggressive the child is (“Children” 1).
Chomsky examines and explores the use of propaganda in the mass media. His focus remains on the “elite” as he would call them, or the corporations and politicians that control the mass media in our country. He speaks of how the U.S. government used propaganda in order to gain support for our country’s involvement in wars from Wilson’s presidency to Bush Sr., and now in our so-called “War on Terror” brought upon by George W. Bush. He explains how he believes this elite group of people control the minds of those that are less educated, and without an open minds. He believes that propaganda has been used through the mass media to guide this population towards supporting political interests.
“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses” (Thinkexist, 2010). The mass media, including news, movies, magazines, music, or other entertainment source has become a part of daily life for many people. As the quote mentions mass media and its power are capable of influencing people’s mind and behavior. Contents in the media introduced to young people make it difficult for them to distinguish between what is real and what is not, as a result stimulating confusion and blind imitation. The mass media plays an important role in the increase of violence, sexual activity, and risky behaviors among teenagers.