The Hot Zone Point Of View Analysis

573 Words2 Pages

In The Hot Zone by Richard Preston, the account of the evolution of Ebola—where it originated and how it spread throughout Africa and other parts of the world before finally making its way to the United States—the point of view was not biased or fallacious, though it may have been slightly exaggerated. However, despite this, it was also the perfect choice of point of view to tell the story in. The point of view is considered to be omniscient third person narrative, meaning that the narrator, in this case Preston, knows everything about what will happen at future points in the book, but decides not to let the reader know it all just yet. The novel is told as if a grandfather is sharing his childhood memories to his grandchildren, where he himself knows all how it will end, but his young listeners do not. …show more content…

For this particular novel, however, the point of view made it that much more interesting. Every so often Preston would throw in an ominous hint about what was coming and it would make you want to keep reading until your eyes ached. The only other work of literature I can think of with the same narrative would be the works of beloved author J.R.R Tolkien, author of The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, and Markus Zuzak’s The Book Thief, and the reason for this is because omniscient third person point of view is a rather difficult way to write. If you aren’t extremely careful, you can give too much away or hand out too little, and the story is ruined. Richard Preston knew how to write in this fashion to not limit the book, but make it alive with mystery and action despite it being nonfiction and about a

More about The Hot Zone Point Of View Analysis

Open Document