Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study global strategic sourcing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study global strategic sourcing
History Fifteen to twenty years ago companies only had purchasing departments. The procurement function was treated more as a need or necessary evil. So when companies use to procure their goods and services the main thing was to cut a purchase order and get that item or services delivered. Not much was thought concerning leveraging the suppliers or putting long-term contracts in place to protect both the company and the supplier. About ten to twelve years ago or so, companies starting getting smarter and reasoned that any good they bought it doesn’t make good business sense to have too many suppliers. They reasoned they should have a limited number of suppliers and should be able to manage it and understand what they were buying and how changes in the marketplace affected what was purchased as well as what amount was paid for what was bought. Additionally, companies should pay attention to how well the suppliers were doing as they performed their duties – are the suppliers best in class, are they providing a good service delivery, cost, quality, etcetera? These types of questions were at best party to the conversation during the old days of purchasing. Some companies were forerunners and managing those considerations well, while others simply cut purchase orders just to get the buy completed. There are a large number of companies that have begun to re-think their sourcing procedures and have begun to consider the practical, logistical and tactical benefits of strategic sourcing. If I were to estimate the current volume of businesses that optimize strategic sourcing, it would be a modest estimate of about 20 percent or so, while another 20 percent although on the path to strategic sourcing groups do less than optimum leveraging ... ... middle of paper ... ... the process, then that firm is not long for this world. But when suppliers share process and function with a firm, whether it is good or bad, then the principal firm benefits from the lessons learned and grows wiser and stronger in the process. Ultimately, it is about the relationship – whether recognized as a strategic alliance or partnership firms rely upon the ethical behavior and integrity of the dealings to leverage market advantage and growth as well as the joy of doing business with a reliable and trustworthy supplier. Strategic sourcing is a critical component because companies view suppliers as integral to their output, specifically; suppliers are often 50 – 90 percent of the total cost base. Many times, suppliers represent the biggest part of not only the cost, but the capability to deliver the goods and services to a principal firm’s customers (7:08).
Suppliers must maintain good relations with the companies in the industry. This is low because there are multiyear service contracts and the delivery industry uses items such as vehicles, employee benefits, general goods and airline contracts associated with overhead of running business, but all contracts are rewarded through an RFP process. There are enough players in the market and had high fixed cost and thus have substantial buying power.
Understanding the needed supply chain capabilities before one sets out to operate in a global market place is a good idea, before trying to find and fill the holes in the dike are needed. Implementing a strategic plan that can be rapidly duplicated throughout the organization, strengthen supplier relationships, set quality expectations for suppliers by using a supplier performance score card to measure compliance. Optimize logistics and manufacturing capabilities, synchronize business units using information technology, and in order to drive organizational efficiencies create a culture of action. Set goals for a sourcing strategy. This means internal, or possibly external, personnel who can build new capabilities seamlessly. The following areas of performance can help identify the highest priorities as follows:
In the 1960s through the 1970s, companies realized strong engineering, design, and manufacturing functions were strong market strategy keys to create and capture customer loyalty. As the demand for new products rose in the 1980s, these market requirements were to increase their flexibility and responsiveness to adapt existing products and processes or to develop new ones in order to meet customer needs. As manufacturing improved in the 1990s, managers began noticing material and service inputs involving suppliers and their major impact on an organization’s ability to meet customer needs. As a result of these changes, organizations now find that it difficult to manage their own organizations. First, they must be involved in the management of their network of all upstream firms that provide directly or indirectly, as well as the network of downstream firms, which are responsible for delivery and market service of the product to the end customer.
However, it is important to note that even with fewer vendors, WM’s purchasing policies and procedures will differ based on the size and sophistication of the supplier involved in the transaction. For larger suppliers like GM, WM will want to rely more heavily on detailed contracts that clearly stipulate the expectations of the company and the implications that will result from unfulfilled expectations. For smaller suppliers, the company will want to soften the dialog used in its contracts to avoid scaring potential vendors away. By using less threatening language, the company will be able to build trust with these smaller vendors and ensure their future cooperation in the timely delivery of quality
All business are in need of supply and understanding the function that is necessary when developing a business can help gage the physical input of the quality and the overall functionality of the supply role. Having the right factors in supply can give us a better understand of the timing and quality. For example, to help stream line the quality of supply companies must set guidelines and performance meters to ensure the productivity and investments. This allows for less risk in knowing the av...
In order to build a strong relationship between companies there must be a trust. So trust played a big role in this case. A good example in this case was that inland steel “concern that a single-sourcing policy might cause it to lose touch with the market”. On the other hand, whirlpool “concerned about the technological risks of relying on only one supplier”. However, building a trust relationship between them was the best solution by the belief that both companies will be a low-cost
Bargaining power of supplier: Suppliers the companies that provide inputs or row materials into the industry. The bargaining power of supplier refers to the ability of alterring product price by providing poor inputs or sevices. Powerful suppliers narrow down the profits out of an industry by raising the costs of companies in the industry. So, powerful suppliers are a threat. Example- Personal computer (PC) industry havily depends of Intel Corporation for micro processor.
Matthyssens, P. and Van den Bulte, C. (1994), “Getting closer and nicer: partnerships in the supply chain”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 72-83.
1. Every organisation in both the public and private sector is in varying degrees dependent on materials and services supplied by other organizations (Johnson and Flynn, 2015:36-37). In your view, what role can supply play in determining an organization's strategic growth?
A reputation for ethical decisions builds trust in your business among business associates and suppliers. Strong supplier relationships are critical to a successful business. Consider the problems you might have if you could not supply what the customer needs...at the time that they need it.
As pointed by Parsons A.L (2002), there was increasing dependent on the relationship and customers is demanding to receive high standard of products and services for them to sustain the business in the intense manufacturing environment. Besides, Xu et al. (2008) has highlighted that supplier is developing a long-term relationship with their crucial suppliers to increase the competitiveness and to establish an effective and efficient supply chain. Trend (2005) also mentioned that work closely in partnership with suppliers is the only way to survive in today’s competitive business environment.
In other words, it aims to link all the supply chain agents to jointly cooperate within the firm as a way to maximize productivity in the supply chain and deliver the most benefits to all related parties [2].
In general, there are different types of procurement type for various situations due to no one method can be suitable under the all different construction project. In this case, there are four procurement paths, which are traditional, design and build, management and design and manage, will be advised to use. However, each method has different aspects of advantages and disadvantages.
A company’s relationship with key suppliers is a vital part of any company’s success. A good supplier relation means better price, meeting company standards and a better service level. That 's why when Honda started working with Modine, Honda made sure that its relationship with Modine was
In the 1980’s successful Japanese firms proved to be leaders in modern management techniques with strong relationships with suppliers, allowing them to produce products of a higher quality and a faster rate than their American and European counterparts. (Ehret, 2004) Their business model focused on economies of scope, as opposed to economies of scale. Industrial firms realised they needed to manage buyer-seller relationships in order to manage cross-functional and cross-organisational processes that would allow them to become more flexible.