The Handmaid's Tale By Margaret Atwood

851 Words2 Pages

Questions need answers. But in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, the answers expected to come at the end of the story are left to the reader’s imagination. Offred’s story ends abruptly, with her supposedly escaping the horrific Republic of Gilead. The readers do not get the reassurance from Atwood that Offred thrived after her time in Gilead. Creatively, Atwood includes a final section of her novel titled “Historical Notes.” These notes present a transcript of a talk given by Professor Pieixoto at a conference in 2195. The Historical Notes offer an historical perspective on Offred’s story. They juxtapose Offred’s deeply personal experience with an objective view on the function of the Republic of Gilead. The Notes provide clarification …show more content…

For example, Professor Maryann Crescent Moon is the chair of the academic conference and introduces the keynote speaker, Professor Pieixoto. It appears the regime of Gilead left little harmful effects on the present-day society. Although this is the case, Pieixoto approaches Offred’s story with a seemly unsympathetic view. This comes as a shock to the reader because Offred’s account of the story attacks the cruel Gileadean government and does not support any of the tough decisions made by the society’s original leaders. The professor disregards Offred’s traumatic personal experience and simply studies Gilead from an historical viewpoint. He also blames Offred for the holes in her story by saying, “...had she had the instincts of a reporter or a spy. What would we not give, now, to even twenty pages or so of printout from [the Commander’s] private computer!” (Atwood 310). Pieixoto’s speech focuses on finding out who the Commander is, rather than analyzing, or even acknowledging, the horror the Handmaids had experienced. Instead, there is a sense of minor respect for the formation of the Republic of Gilead by the professor. “Its genius was synthesis” (Atwood 307). This statement comes after a lengthy report of how different historical groups, such as Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, contributed to the structure of Gilead. True, Gilead was a creative solution for a …show more content…

“As for the ultimate fate of our narrator, it remains obscure” (Atwood 310). Atwood purposefully leaves the readers with an unsatisfactory ending to manufacture a fear that this terrifying story continues past the end of the novel, although she believes reality will not fall to a tragedy like Gilead as she mentions in the introduction: “Let us hope it doesn’t come to that. I trust it will not” (Atwood XIX). The introduction reveals that Atwood is often asked if The Handmaid’s Tale is a prediction of the future. She creates such a realistically scary novel that it evokes a deep fear in the readers of what is to

Open Document