The Handmaid's Tale 'And' The Pedest

782 Words2 Pages

In the novels ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ and ‘The Pedestrian’ we don’t see a drastic change to the laws and normalities of today’s society. In ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ the laws are an extremists version of male dominance which even today has an effect. In ‘The Pedestrian’ there is less crime, less laws (with exceptions of things like marriage) and it’s set in the future with little change to the way things are now. This statement may have some relevance to some aspects of the novels but can be regarded as an over exaggeration in others.

The thought of male superiority and women being nothing more than baby incubators is evident in ‘The Handmaid’s tale’. There are no laws that extinguish women's rights in today’s society but there are people who have this mindset, even though it is a minority. Some of the laws in Gilead may be different as the laws and normalities are the opinions of the few people who believe that male superiority is embraced to a further extent. The novel represents sex as something no longer for two significant others but for mens pleasure and women’s sole use, procreation. When Offred …show more content…

A theocratic society is a society where the laws and government are ruled in the name of God. In today’s society the laws are theocratic as they are based on the ten commandments, which are the laws and rules God sent to the people to follow and go to heaven. We see the similarities in a number of laws murder, Thou shalt not kill and thievery, Thou shalt not steal. Gilead is a theocratic society as its name is a city referenced in the bible “behold my handmaid Bilhah, go in unto her; and she shall bear upon my knees, that 1 may also have children by her Genesis 30 1:3” we see how much the novel is based on religion in the Epigraph where it references multiple biblical stories. Just like our society the novel is always based on religion making the laws and normalities not drastically

Open Document