The Handmaid's Tale Analysis

519 Words2 Pages

In present time, the modern world we live is constantly fighting for improvement throughout each nation, some large political and sociocultural issues includes the rights for women, LGBTQ persons, people of colour, Aboriginals, etc. These subjects include an endless list of issues within that need solving and for social justice to be restored. Margaret Atwood uses the Handmaid’s Tale as a source for what could happen in a religious-driven totalitarian society were to take over a democratic civilization. There is a warning of our rights being stripped of us for the ‘good of our future children’. The commander in the Handmaid’s tale discusses when an extreme change occurs, or a revolution in this case, not all involved are going to reap the benefits of this change, someone is going to have to deal with the consequences. The ‘Sons of Jacob” decide the fate of an entire nation due to the mass decline of fertile women and successful births. This decision to ‘purify’ and ‘protect’ the human race is nothing but a misogynistic regime to control the nation. The source of taking charge is meant to …show more content…

While Atwood touches on a plausible future communal problem and Wiesel discussed the past, horrific events of the Holocaust Genocide. There is some common area between the two, especially the grey area where there is no simple network of positions in the camps. In Primo Levi, the narrator discusses exactly this lack of boundary in positions: “the network of human relationships inside the Lagers was not simple: it could not be reduced to the two blocs of victims and persecutors”. There were certain prisoners given positions of power to keep other prisoners in line, named the Kapo, Kommando, and Sonderkommando. The obedience of the camps forced individuals to think only as individuals, protecting oneself was the ultimate agenda for

Open Document