The Guilty Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

714 Words2 Pages

Summary Opinion: Brutus is guilty with the collaboration of assassinating Julius Caesar. When Caesar is crowned the new Emperor of Rome, Brutus was very envious of the power he possessed. Due to this jealousy and ambition for power, Brutus betrayed his closest friend. Although Caesar intended to better the conditions of Rome both economically and politically, Brutus believed them to be lies. He is guilty of killing Caesar since there was no reason to, and it also directly violates the law. Facts: Brutus never saw the actions or characteristics of the powerful Caesar, positively. Throughout his reign, Caesar completed good deeds such as caring for the captured citizens of Rome; “he hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms the general coeffers [filled],” and he established new beginnings for each of them, too (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 241-242). Aside from caring for the captives, in his will, Caesar “[gave], to every several man, seventy-five drachmas,” and “hath left [them] all his walks, his private arbors… common pleasures, to walk abroad and recreate [themselves]”(Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 241- 242 …show more content…

Rather than the death penalty or paying a fine, Brutus should be punished with life in prison, alone. Brutus had always been envious and jealous regarding Caesars’ power and control. His actions always consisted of virtuous intentions, never wanting to hurt his city or citizens of Rome. All Brutus did, is to see the negative in every positive Caesar conducted. He involved himself in the murder of Caesar, taking away the one person who was very adamant in improving the conditions of Rome. It isn’t fair how Rome lost a great hero, because of a desirous, disloyal citizen. A trial should be led, and charges should definitely be pressed, because with all the facts and evidence against Brutus, this trial is destined for triumphant

Open Document