Alexander Hamilton And Alexander Madison's Anglo-American Government

1257 Words3 Pages

After the construction of the newly ratified Constitution, one of the heaviest economic duty was the the inherited debt from the revolutionary war with Great Britain. In order to help relieve these debts, a collective and protective tariff was created in order to help the Federal government collect revenue in order to pay off the debt. The tariff taxed goods imported into the United States from any foreign nations, in example the tax would charge 10 cents per gallon of wine, and so on with other goods imported. Forward with the goal of paying off debt, the taxes were also linked in protecting American manufacturers from foreign competition. After the war a great deal of the American market relied on imported British seeing to the lack of domestic …show more content…

The import of British manufactured goods and, accessories made up for 80% of the tariffs revenue for government, Hamilton believed in keeping a durable trade relation with Britain would help generate revenue for repaying the national debt and, government expenses. In contempt, the protective tariffs were so suppose to protect domestic manufactures from foreign competition, but instead it Hamilton’s strong relationship with Britain stifled the growth and revenue of these industries, James Madison had proposed a stronger protective tariff under Boston manufacturers and, tradesmen in 1789, all the appeals were of same similar pattern, the demand of foreign goods in the American market. The demand had stifled their profits, and they demanded for a strong tariff to protect their marketing goods. The motion was ultimately blocked by the Senate with opposition coming from Alexander Hamilton. in Hamilton’s defense against the proposal, he issued that the need of a “revenue override the demand for protection of manufacturers”(cite …show more content…

Even though the tariffs were also meant to protect infant industries, instead the refusal led to an increase of the tariffs by Hamilton which was opposed by an outrage by smaller manufacturers. Hamilton had favored the wealthy big time merchants and, manufacturers who accumulated their wealth trading within the British empire, by doing so he brushed off the smaller property holders and, majority. The smaller manufacturers felt the country’s economic policies were still not providing enough capital and support for them. The immense flock of British goods that circulated the American markets was another testament to the futile armor that the tariffs provided for domestic manufacturers..A statement in John R. Nelson’s piece quoted “ Finally the Virginia manufacturers of cordage requested a higher duty on imported cordage, but they doubted that even such protection could induce shippers to buy from them since “most of the ships are British & give a preference to English Cordage…” In the minds of these American manufacturers, Britain and its American importers assumed a central role in impeding their economic development” (Nelson, 977). The quandary ended up being one of the major reasons for the creation of the new Republican party. It was soon realized that Hamilton’s economic policies and, objection to raise import

Open Document