Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the giver
The giver book summary and analysis
Literary analysis over the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the giver
as the children’s book rather, a young adult or adult fiction. The Giver
was one of the earliest novels of Lois Lowry which has been set up in a totalitarian
community, and has controlled even the memories of people.
The Giver revolves around the community which has the concept of Sameness.
The elders of the community has created Sameness in order to keep every aspect of
society alike and away from chaos. The community follows a set of rules and regulations
and nobody can rebel. One who tries to rebel, is Released into Elsewhere by the elders of
the community. Or it can be said that, the people who belong to this community are
controlled in a way that they have lost the ability to rationalize the pros and cons of any
happening around them.
The
…show more content…
For him it was unusual to register the change as his
community does not have colours.
The community monitor the actions of every child before the Ceremony of
Twelve, to assign them with a job, keeping in mind the interests and capabilities of the
child. Elders of the community are well aware that Jonas is different from others and can
be their New Receiver of Memories, which is a prestigious Assignment as the Receiver
has to keep all the old memories from before the time of the Sameness.
The Giver is based upon the idealism of a dystopian society but, it was very late
that we got to know, what we thought to be a utopian society was not ideal in real. The
author has beautifully manoeuvred her story by keeping it in a series of action. The story
begins with idea of Sameness and the community seems to be an idealistic society where
everything appears to be alluring and catches the attention of readers but very soon, it
becomes apparent that Freedom of Thought and Freedom of Expression is an
Set in a community with no climate, emotions, choices, or memories Lois Lowry tells the tale of Jonas in The Giver. Jonas is selected to be the receiver of memory, which means the memories of generations past, before the community was created, will all be transferred to him to hold. As Jonas receives memories his concept of the world around him drastically changes. Jonas starts out as twelve-year-old boy with perceptions different from those around him, he then begins to see the community for what it really is, and he makes a plan to change it.
The Giver is actually one of my all-time favorite books, so I’ve looked into why she left the book so inconclusive in the past. The Giver is basically about a boy named Jonas who lives in a perfect society. He lives in a household with his two parents and his little sister Lilly. When he becomes a 12, he goes through a huge ceremony and all the elders assign them their jobs. In this community, there is no lying, stealing, racism, pain, sunlight or color. Jonas was chosen to be The Receiver, and he didn’t know what to do because this job was such a big deal. Jonas then goes through training with the current Receiver, who is now The Giver. Training consists of The Giver passing down the memories from when the community was not what it is today. Memories that are passed down are things that are normal to us. Memories of sun, snow, pain, and sorrow.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
“The Giver” a novel by Lois Lowry (1993), is an, engaging science fiction tale that provides the reader with examples of thought provoking ethical and moral quandaries. It is a novel geared to the young teenage reader but also kept me riveted. Assigning this novel as a class assignment would provide many opportunities for teachers and students to discuss values and morals.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Lois Lowry’s The Giver considers something the world takes for granted: personal empowerment. These simple day-to-day decisions create what the world is. Without self-empowerment and right to believe in a personal decision, what is the human race? The world can only imagine, as Lois Lowry does in The Giver. She asks: What if everything in life was decided by others? What if spouses, children, the weather, education, and careers were chosen based upon the subjects’ personality? What if it didn’t matter what the subject thought? Jonas, the Receiver, lives here. He eats, sleeps, and learns in his so-called perfect world until he meets the Giver, an aged man, who transmits memories of hope, pain, color, and love. Jonas then escapes his Community with a newborn child (meant to be killed), hoping to find a life of fulfillment. On the way, he experiences pain, sees color, and feels love. Irony, symbolism, and foreshadowing are three literary devices used to imply the deeper meaning of The Giver.
The Giver was about a boy named Jonas who was elected the job of receiver. This book reminds me of another book called The City Of Amber. This book was about a strict town that was so limited on resources they had assigned how much paper each person got. Much like Jonas the main character did not like the lifestyle they were living. Both story’s consisted of strict towns where the people really did not have a say in politics. And they both solved their problem in a similar way/path.
Lois Lowry book The Giver is about a boy that is eleven named jonas lives in a utopia and every one is the same except him and the giver. The giver is the keeper of memories and gives memories to jonas when he turns twelve and he will become the giver . In the book The Giver They do conditionally accept the practice in euthanasia because it in the society. Is releasing new children okay? Is it also the same for the old? Is release a punishment?
Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and
When you hear the word "Utopia" everyone will have something different come to mind. When I hear the word, I instantly think of the book "The Giver" by Lois Lowry. A Utopia is an idea, a state of mind, or perfect place. Sounds great right? In "The Giver" the author focuses on a world of "sameness". Even though Utopia will have the same definite definition no matter who you ask, you can ask 100 people what would their vision of a utopia be, and you are more than likely going to get 100 different responses. Presently, we are inflicted with things that are the opposite of perfect. We have to cope with things such as war, discrimination, sickness, drugs, violence and many other things. If I could have my own perfect world, I think I would probably have a world kind of like Lois Lowry dreamt up in his book. Three main aspects that I would concentrate on incorporating into a Utopian society, would be a world with no racism, no violence, and unemployment.
The Giver provides a chance that readers can compare the real world with the society described in this book through some words, such as release, Birthmothers, and so on. Therefore, readers could be able to see what is happening right now in the real society in which they live by reading her fiction. The author, Lowry, might build the real world in this fiction by her unique point of view.
The word dystopian has multiple meanings and characteristics that are all intertwined together depending on the situation. In the book, The Giver, these characteristics include constant surveillance, control over society, and an expectation to conform to society’s demands are on display. Lois Lowry has a colored past that has allowed her to write this book which has opened the doors to a whole new genre of literature. She once said that the real reason people struggled to let go of this book was its ambiguous ending (Connelly). What that means is we struggle with the lack of a feeling of closure or a conclusion.
The Giver was written by Lois Lowry and published by Houghton Mifflin Company Boston. The genre of this story is fantasy. Jonas is an eleven year old boy who lives somewhere in the future. The society that he lives in is very structured, they do not have any emotions and everything is decided by people called “The Elders”, from their children to their careers to even their names. Everyone in this society is basically all the same.
The book The Giver is a dystopian book because you don’t get to make any of your own decisions. You would never know the truth about release. You would never experience life how you should experience it. The world may seem perfect from someone’s view inside the community, but from the outside it is harsh and horrible. Their world could be turned into a utopia eventually, but as of right know it is a
“The best thing about memories, is making them.” In Jonas’s community no had ever made memories .They lived perfect lives in an utopian society, but never had a choice. Everything was chosen for them. Their jobs, names, and whole lives where planned out for them. I would not give up my life of making choices for a life of sameness. People make choices, good and bad, but these choices are what make us who we are and without them we would just be ordinary people living in sameness.