The General Reasons In Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

820 Words2 Pages

The general argument made by Henry David Thoreau in his work, Civil Disobedience, is that we should not follow laws that we do not morally agree to. More specifically, Thoreau argues that the government should not be heavily involved with people and should give more freedom. He writes “I have paid no poll-tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and, as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck with the foolishness of that institution which treated me as if I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up.” In this passage, Thoreau is suggesting that you …show more content…

“I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically.”. I have read this quote many times before and it always made me think. Would a government that governs least lead to a total anarchy? Of course there always pros and cons to this and every aspect should be considered in the scenario. Although I believe that the government should always help the people rather than hurt, they should still have some sort of saying. However, Thoreau thinks otherwise. He believes that there should be very little government involvement. I believe that it depends on the situation. No you shouldn’t always follow the government and agree with them, but you shouldn’t always revolt against them in an act of rebellion. Some things just have to be overseen and accepted as part of nature, much like paying taxes. The consequences of not paying taxes, far exceeds the actual payment of taxes. Therefore, I could look past that, pay my taxes, and continue on …show more content…

What grabbed my attention was him calling the American government a tradition. I assume he’s speaking of the theological definition of tradition. He also says the government tries to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity. He’s trying to say that the government tries to carry on it’s ideas, unchanged, to future generations. As if there will always be, in reality, one ruler throughout time. He then says “losing some it’s integrity?”, so basically not being honest, and cheating the people. He however makes it clear on what his views towards the government are. As stated “But, to speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government.”. This is what I would call the middle man, he wants the government to meet him halfway there. He doesn’t believe that the government should be completely out of the picture, but he does believe it’s laws and tactics towards the people are not efficient enough. He starts the sentence with “to speak practically”. Which means this could be not what he one hundred percent feels, but what he thinks is the most reasonable

Open Document