The first outstanding aspect in No Country For Old Men is the absence of as much punctuation as possible. McCarthy used very few apostrophes, quotation marks, or any other basic punctuation to provide a variety of effects. Her writing style is just like the setting of the book – stripped down the bare necessities, plain, and wide open. It also nearly forces you to reread many sentences to gather all the information McCarthy has subtly injected in every line. It is a very unique but appealing style, particularly for this piece of literature. McCarthy’s literary style adds a different look to what is already an action packed novel.
The point of view played a very integral role in No Country For Old Men. The addition of first person from Sheriff Bell’s view almost added another side conflict. Without being able to read about what he really felt, the reader would be unaware to the guilt and blame he is straddled with. This emotional burden was from an execution he was in charge of in the past. He, “sent one boy to the gas chamber at Huntsville. One and only one. My arrest and my testimony. I went up there and visited with him two or three times. Three times. The last time was the day of his execution. I didn’t have to go but I did.” (Page 3). To Sheriff Bell, tracking down and killing Anton Chigurh was the only way he could retain his confidence and dignity as a sheriff. After he failed to capture the mass-murderer, he felt stepping down was the right thing to do. However, without being able to dig into Bell’s mind, he would be just another stock character. McCarthy’s use of first person point of view adds a different, interesting perspective to what is already an interesting and exciting plot.
Violence and brutality are very invo...
... middle of paper ...
...te.html>.
Reisinger, Don. "Call of Duty: Black Ops launch beats MW2 Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20022509-17.html#ixzz1Ix6asXQR."news.cnet.net. Cnet, 11 011 2010. Web. 8 Apr 2011. .
"Punishment." en.wikipedia.org. Wikipedia, 17 003 2010. Web. 8 Apr 2011. .
"Death Penalty." www.gallup.com. Gallup, 06 005 2002. Web. 8 Apr 2011. .
"Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46."www.canlii.org. Canadian Legal Information Institute, 15 012 2010. Web. 8 Apr 2011. .
Robinson, B.A. "Facts about capital punishment."www.religioustolerance.org. Religious Tolerance, 07 012 2009. Web. 8 Apr 2011. .
"Criminal Code of Canada." Criminal Code of Canada. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. .
Zhang, Colin, ed. “Canadian Criminal Code.” YourLaws. N.p., 11 Nov. 2013. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. .
Colson, Charles W. “Capital Punishment.” The Rutherford Institute. 11 Nov. 2002. 30 May 2010 .
“Capital Punishment; The Death Penalty.” 6 Jan. 2007. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 4 Apr. 2007. < http://www.religioustolerance.org/execute.htm>.
Opponents of capital punishment are outspoken and vehement in their arguments. They believe the death penalty does not does not deter crime. They also hold the opinion that endin...
ABSTRACT: In this paper I present a moral argument against capital punishment that does not depend upon the claim that all killing is immoral. The argument is directed primarily against non-philosophers in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Oddly, the moral argument against capital punishment has not been effective in the United States despite the biblical injunction against killing. Religious supporters of the death penalty often invoke a presumed distinction between ‘killing’ and ‘murdering’ and avow that God forbade the latter but not the former. Self-defense and just wars are cited as cases of morally justified killing. Accepting these premises, I point out that when cases of justified killing in self-defense are altered to include an element of delay, disarming and premeditation, they too become murder. Since the death penalty clearly involves the elements of delay, disarming and premeditation, I conclude that the death penalty is murder in the biblical sense and ought to be abolished in any God-fearing (or otherwise moral) society.
Capital punishment is an age-old practice. It has been used in civilizations for millennia, and will continue to be used for millennia to come. Whether used for the right or wrong reasons, capital punishment is unmistakable in its various forms. From hangings, to firing squads, to lethal injections, capital punishment and the associated proceeding have evolved over time. There have been many arguments against capital punishment, many of which still hold true. As capital punishment has evolved over time, however, many of the most valid arguments have been proven all but null. Capital punishment still has its ethical and moral concerns, but as it has evolved over time these concerns have not necessarily become less valid, but fewer in number when specifically addressing capital punishment. The proceedings that come hand-in-hand with capital punishment, however, have become increasingly more rigorous and controversial and are the main focus of most capital punishment concerns.
Christian attitudes to Punishment/Capital Punishment are still being debated today. As can be read from the report, it is a very complex topic to discuss in relation to Christian attitudes. The purpose of the report was to find out what these Christian attitudes are and from the report, it has shown there are many on Punishment/Capital Punishment. In the report, I discussed the history of Capital Punishment, the different Christian groups against it, how the Bible is split on the attitude towards Capital Punishment with the Old Testament being for it and the New Testament having a mix of both sides and the Christian ethics related to all of the areas.
The precise question at issue in this essay is the moral standing of capital punishment. Taking the teachings of the largest Christian denomination (Catholic) as a starting point, some say that the presentation of capital punishment in the Catechism of 1992 (#2266) differs surely in restrictiveness from the teaching of the Catechism of 1566. And that the revised Catechism of 1997 is even more restrictive. Leet's examine these ane other aspects of the morality of capital punishment.
Harrison, Brigid C. “Death to Capital Punishment.” The New York Times, Late Edition. New York, New York: Dec. 2, 2007. Print.
Cormac McCarthy declared to Oprah Winfrey his personal sentiments that he prefers "simple declarative sentences" and that he uses capital letters, periods, an occasional comma, and or a colon for setting off a list only, but "never a semicolon." He does not use quotation marks for dialogue and believes there is no reason to "blot the page up with weird tiny marks." So indeed, Cormac McCarthy demonstrates an idiosyncratic composition demeanor in his marquee novels. He is an author that does not stick to convention when it comes to writing. McCarthy does not seem to enjoy using weird grammar points or symbols unless they are absolutely essential. McCarthy’s manner illustrates the novel’s occurrences
D’Alembe, Talbot “Understanding the Death Penalty Study Commission Report” Raising the Bar in Capital Cases. 34.2 ( 2007): n.pag. Web. 24 Jul 2014.
An extensive use of Goldratt's thinking process is applied in the various businesses as part of the problem solving. "It's not luck" emphasizes the importance of using the thinking processes in business and in your personal life. The thinking processes refer to a logical, graphical, general and practical method of problem solving methodology and basically comprised of 3 steps. These steps as described by Goldratt are:
---- World Book Online Americas Edition. Ed. Franklin E. Zimring. Capital Punishment. 17 Apr 2002 14 Apr 2002.
Cavanagh, Suzanne. “Capital Punishment: A Brief Overview”. CRS Report For Congress 95-505GOV (1995): 4. Sellin, Thorsten. The Penalty of Death. Sage Publishing Co.,1980.