Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proof of the existence of god
Proofs for God's existence
Existence of God Proofs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Proof of the existence of god
The Existence of God
What we call religious experience can differ greatly. Some reports
exist of supernatural happenings that it would be difficult to explain
from a rational, scientific point of view. On the other hand, there
also exist the sorts of testimonies that simply seem to convey a
feeling or a peace of oneness- something which most of us, religious
or not, may possibly relate to.
Firstly, I will consider the nature of an experience. Experience
involves encounters which are empirical (testable via senses). We draw
non- empirical conclusions about many things and people- that they
have orange hair and are 5 feet tall, that they are lonely and
confused. These conclusions are mainly although not entirely based on
empirical evidence. If most our encounters with other people and
objects are empirical it is therefore reasonable to suggest that we
can experience God and draw conclusions about there nature from this
experience. If we can find meaning in things that cannot be verified
by empirical evidence then it may well be possible to experience God
and use these experiences to prove gods nature and existence.
Experiences of god are not regular and universal like ordinary
experiences. Religious experiences often accompanies existing belief
i.e. takes place with those who are already believers. God is believed
first via faith which means that by having a basic framework it'll
make you accept religious experiences. It is possible to conclude that
it is a learned belief.
Could one go as to suggest that religious experiences are proof for
the existence of God? For a religious believer the involvement of God
in human af...
... middle of paper ...
...eligious experience of their god. This then takes
us back to the notion that religious experiences are shadowed by ones
culture/ tradition and therefore human rather than divinely centred.
To conclude, I believe claiming a religious experience as a proof for
the existence of god creates more questions and problems than it seeks
to answer. Furthermore, sceptics may state that the fact one claims to
have had a religious experience does not mean that god exists. Just
because a person believes god is there (epistemology) does not mean
that God is actually there (ontology). You need something more than
the 'feeling' of religious experience for the verification of this.
The argument may form a part of a proof but it often combines with
other proofs, the argument is not sufficient alone.
[1] The Puzzle of God page 101
forgiven, so there is no need to ‘force’ yourself to believe. This argument is far from proving the existence of God, it argues more for. the purpose of believing in him rather than whether he actually exists. The.. In conclusion, all the arguments bar one that have been covered have. been strongly criticised, questioning their validity.
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!! Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God.
what is normal and usual; that it is not usual to be able to describe
Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.
Saint Aquinas defines the existence of God with the upmost clarity. Saint Anselm and William Paley attempt to tackle the existence of God but are weighed down by weaknesses within their argument. Even with Saint Anselm being a Christian theologian, he does not incorporate his personal religious beliefs into his argument. St. Anselm relies purely on logic and ontology to define what he constitutes as God, defined as a being in which nothing greater can be thought. This definition is general enough to be consistent with what various individuals establish as their “God.” Anselm uses Tinkerbell as an example to defend his thought to reality premise. Tinkerbell relies on the faith from children to believe in her existence for her to exist. For Anselm, if something is thought then in some realm, it must exist. However, St. Anselm does not address crucial arguments that deteriorate his position. The translation from thought into reality is not clear. A sole idea constructed by the mind does not establish its place in reality. Dragons are thought and even read to a child during their adolesc...
Then, in the preceding section, Rachels, tries to validate the existence of God by using several types of arguments such as Argument from design, Evolution and Intelligent
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument is an a priori argument. The arguments attempt to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselm's classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes.
The concept of God can be a difficult one to grasp especially in today's world - a world in which anyone that believes in God is trying to define exactly what God is. To even attempt to grasp such a concept, one must first recognize his own beliefs in respect to the following questions: Is God our creator? Is God omnipotent (all-powerful) or omniscient (all-knowing) or both? Does God care? Is God with us? Does God interfere with life on earth? These questions should be asked and carefully answered if one should truly wish to identify his specific beliefs in God's existence and persistence.
God can be defined as a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions (1). There are many people that do not believe in any religion. People who do not believe in a religion have no reason for believing in a God. People who do not believe in a God and argue against the existence of God are proving something that is completely false. There is a God for numerous reasons.
In the following I intend to prove that the ontological argument is in and of itself, insufficient in proving that God exists. There are a few problems with the argument that I will be discussing in detail in an attempt to illustrate exactly why ‘The Ontological Argument’ is unsatisfactory.
But I don't want to presuppose that God's existence is a fact before the proof is established. Simply by looking at what constitutes our world, we can say that all matter consists of energy, proving the existence of energy. How, then, do we know this energy exists? The simple answer is, we are aware of it. We then only have to find out how this awareness came about.
...roofs of God’s existence are basically the same in that they are all, essentially, examples of cause and effect. This cause and effect does not neccesarily prove there is a God but it does lead one to wonder what may be the highest cause, and for this there is no proof.
... God and how He is related to us – how powerful He is to make everything in this world works; how He made everything almost perfect for us. I have also learned that believing He exist, makes me understand more about His existence, just like what St. Anselm said. I believe that believing He exists, is what makes Him exist. For me, Yes, God really exist.
The Quran states, “The heavens declare the wonder of God, the skies declare the work of His hands. Looking at the stars, understanding the massiveness of the universe, observing the wonders of nature, seeing the beauty of a sunset all of these things point to a Creator God.” If these were not enough, there is also evidence of God in our own hearts. Deep within us is the acknowledgment that there is something beyond this life and someone beyond this world. We can deny this knowledge rationally, but God’s presence in us and all around us is still
Proof Of The Exsistence of God Either God exists or He doesn't. There is no middle ground. Any attempt to remain neutral in relation to God's existence is automatically synonymous with unbelief. The question for God's existence is really important. Does God exist? Theology, cosmological, teleological and ontological arguments are all have ways to prove the existence of God. With all of these great arguments how can one deny that there is a God. There is a God and with these reasons I will prove that.