Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legal and ethical issues surrounding euthanasia
Utilitarian arguments for euthanasia
Utilitarian arguments for euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legal and ethical issues surrounding euthanasia
The Effects of Euthanasia The case Wyatt v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust hinges on the life of Charlotte Wyatt who was born three months prematurely weighing less than a pound with serious heart and lung problems that have resulted in her needing to be hooked up to an oxygen machine indefinitely. The crux of the case is that the doctors (Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust) do not want to resuscitate Charlotte should her body fail and Charlotte’s parents (Wyatt) want her to be resuscitated. The doctors have tried everything to improve Charlotte’s life and have come to the conclusion that her organs are so damaged that she is in constant pain. According to the doctors if her organs were to stop working, reviving her would only continue to keep her in a life full of pain. In addition, there is no chance of her life improving and therefore she would suffer constantly he whole life. They estimate that she will not continue to live beyond her infant years due to her internal damage. On the other side of the case we have the Wyatt’s who believe that Charlotte deserves every chance to live. When the case first went to the high courts in October 2003 she was unresponsive. However, contrary to what the doctors expected, she survived the winter and her parents report signs of improvement. Charlotte is not only able to make facial expressions such as smiling, but she also has limited hearing and she is able to reach out to people and touch them with her hands. The examination of this case must be a philosophical examination. In order to derive an answer from the information at hand the courts must consider what this case stands for from a philosophical standpoint. There are two basic points that they must consider. The first is sanctity of life... ... middle of paper ... ...ition, but the doctors have the most knowledge about Charlotte’s health. They are not murdering her by refusing to resuscitate. Rather, they are relieving her from suffering. From their point of view, the doctors are doing the right thing, and we agree that they have every right to refuse treatment in concordance with their Hippocratic Oath. Whether you side with the courts or the Wyatt’s, we all agree that this is a very tragic case. There are no easy answers, and our hearts are torn by the decisions that both Charlotte’s parents and the doctors have to face. One thing that both parties want is to uphold the sanctity of life. Her parents want Charlotte to live, but she had technically died three times already. Charlotte must be living in agony. From our perspective, we agree that nature should take its course so that Charlotte can finally rest in peace.
The one example of this that I found most relevant in the book is the situation of Armando. Armando was shot and the bullet lodged in the spinal canal. It caused enough damage to make him a paraplegic, but not enough to kill him. The ethics committee had decided that it was best to encompass a DNR because he had no health insurance, and his quality of life was not what it was before. When the doctors went to approve this with Armando, he denied the DNR and said that he wanted what ever was necessary to be done to him to save his life (Belkin p. 58-59). This made Cindy worried for the cost of keeping him alive was substantial. All the doctors and caretakers believed that he should be placed under DNR, however that was not what Armando wanted. The doctors believed that was the wrong decision. This correlates to what the quote was from the book on page 70; doctors can tend to be narrow-minded when it comes to the care of a patient. They believe that their course of action is the best and do not agree if the patient wants something different. This I have found is also true in my own personal experience with doctors. For example, when I was about 17 my wisdom teeth were growing in. I was in terrible pan from two of my wisdom teeth being impacted. My
This is a fascinating case because it presents the distinction between a patient’s right to refuse treatment and a physician’s assistance with suicide. Legally, Diane possessed the right to refuse treatment, but she would have faced a debilitating, painful death, so the issue of treatment would be a moot point. It would be moot in the sense that Diane seemed to refuse treatment because the odds were low, even if she survived she would spend significant periods of time in the hospital and in pain, and if she didn’t survive she would spend her last days in the hospital. If Diane were to merely refuse treatment and nothing else (as the law prescribes) than she would not have been able to avoid the death which she so dearly wanted to avoid.
Barbara Huttman’s “A Crime of Compassion” has many warrants yet the thesis is not qualified. This is a story that explains the struggles of being a nurse and having to make split-second decisions, whether they are right or wrong. Barbara was a nurse who was taking care of a cancer patient named Mac. Mac had wasted away to a 60-pound skeleton (95). When he walked into the hospital, he was a macho police officer who believed he could single-handedly protect the whole city (95). His condition worsened every day until it got so bad that he had to be resuscitated two or three times a day. Barbara eventually gave into his wishes to be let go. Do you believe we should have the right to die?
In the JonBenet Ramsey case didn’t know she had blunt force injury until her autopsy shows where she suffered a linear fracture to the right skull leaving a long crack in her skull. She even suffered from being strangle to death by rope being tied around her throat and being pulled really tight around her neck making it hard for her to breath her neck had red blood stains from like the inside of the skin reflecting on the outside also showing nail scratch marks on her neck describing her trying to get the rope from around her neck. Lindsay armstrong was torn to pieces by the defence lawyer and made to hold up a g-string underwear she wore during the time of the attack. She said it was like being raped all over again the 14 year old accuser
I once did not realize the ethics of medical care of an infant, let alone one that is ill in the NICU. Baby Dylan was at 23 weeks gestation when mother Jennifer and father Kevin gave birth to him. He seemed like a little human eager to live but even the latest advances in medicine were unable to keep him alive. I believe that the parents ended up making the correct decision for baby Dylan. If he ended up being a “keeper” he still could have had severe neurological and respiratory problems for the rest of his life.
She was a 29 year old newlywed with a terminal brain tumor that lived in California. After learning about her tumor she had several procedures done to attempt to stop the progression of the growth of the tumor. Unfortunately, not only did the tumor not slow down, it actually became more aggressive. The doctors gave Brittany six months to live. The doctors presented her with options of treatment where the hair of her scalp would be singed off and her head left with first-degree burns, among others. She had to weigh her options and determine her quality of life. Her and her husband came to the difficult conclusion that there was no treatment that would save her life and all the treatments that were suggested to her would destroy the quality of the time she had left. She did not want to put her family through the nightmare of watching her decline and suffer on hospice and so she decided that death with dignity is what she wanted to
Justice is something that we all as human being want to see fulfill, especially when we are the one that need it for us or our love ones. The family members of those who were killed by Susan Atkins and her companion will agree with it. The damage cause to their dears and the endless pain and suffering in effect from their death will support the decision take by the parole board in September 2, 2009 in the denial of a compassionate release due to Atkins’ health.
“From Private Ordeal to National Fight: The Case of Terri Schiavo” by Clyde Haberman (2014) he explains the dilemma of Terri Schiavo. A twenty-six year old, Terri Schiavo, mysteriously collapsed due to her brain being deprived of oxygen for to long. She was then put in a persistent vegetative state, where in the article it states “ She could breath without mechanical assistance. But doctors concluded that she was incapable of thought or emotion.” Her parents wanted her to be kept alive while her husband knew Terri wouldn’t. In the article it claims “ Florida courts, while sympathizing with the parents, consistently sided with the husband as a matter of law.” Although the courts sided with Michael, the Florida politicians felt differently. “
Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.
Charlotte’s parents wanted the doctors to continue testing until it was determined that her life diffidently had no chance of remaining. Because, of Charlotte’s parents’ desires unfortunately caused Charlotte to die a painful death without her parents. If the patient is unable to speak for their selves, the family should be able to have some say in the medical treatment, however; if the doctors have tried everything they could do, the hospital should have final decisions whether or not the patient dies or treatment
How it relates to healthcare: The child’s injuries proved severe, and Bedner faced a long prison sentence if convicted,but he didn’t face murder charges.As his critically ill daughter,C.B. remained on life support the hospital sought to exclude Bender from decisions regarding from life support. The girl eventually did die, but the case generated considerable public debate and stimulated a controversy among bioethics scholars .
A divergent set of issues and opinions involving medical care for the very seriously ill patient have dogged the bioethics community for decades. While sophisticated medical technology has allowed people to live longer, it has also caused protracted death, most often to the severe detriment of individuals and their families. Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, believes too many Americans are “dying badly.” In discussing this issue, he stated, “Families cannot imagine there could be anything worse than their loved one dying, but in fact, there are things worse.” “It’s having someone you love…suffering, dying connected to machines” (CBS News, 2014). In the not distant past, the knowledge, skills, and technology were simply not available to cure, much less prolong the deaths of gravely ill people. In addition to the ethical and moral dilemmas this presents, the costs of intensive treatment often do not realize appreciable benefits. However, cost alone should not determine when care becomes “futile” as this veers medicine into an even more dangerous ethical quagmire. While preserving life with the best possible care is always good medicine, the suffering and protracted deaths caused from the continued use of futile measures benefits no one. For this reason, the determination of futility should be a joint decision between the physician, the patient, and his or her surrogate.
In the case of Cruzan by Cruzan V. Director, Missouri Department of Health “Right to Die” is the issue at hand. Nancy Cruzan twenty-five on January 11, 1983 was thrown from her car in a crash a few miles from her home. When police and paramedics arrived on the scene of the crash her brain had been deoxygenated for somewhere in between the time frame of twelve to fourteen minutes. Sadly
Warren, Mary Anne , and Mappes and D. DeGrazia. "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion." Biomedical Ethics 4th (1996): 434-440. Print.
In a situation like this, any parent would defend their child in a blink of an eye. This is what the parents of Alfie, Charlie, and Israel simply did; they defended their child. There is not the right kind of respect in our court systems today for a family who face the possibility of losing a child. Former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich tweeted, “The British government’s decision to allow two critically ill babies [Alfie and Charlie] to die in two years is a natural reflection of the culture of death and the steady increase in totalitarian tendencies among western governments”(Osborne). He recognizes that the deaths of these children were all outcomes in the removal of life support resulted from a court and doctor’s