The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Nighttime Narrator Essay

1166 Words3 Pages

Christopher is not a reliable narrator because he can not read emotions. An example of this is when he talks about how he keeps a picture that Siobhan drew of different emotions to decode what people are trying to express with their face. We learn this on page three of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime when Christopher says “I got Siobhan to draw lots of these faces and then write down next to them exactly what they meant. I kept the piece of paper in my pocket and took it out when I didn’t understand what someone was saying. But it was very difficult to decide which of the diagrams was most like the face they were making because people’s faces move very quickly.” (3) This is just one way that Christopher exhibits how he can …show more content…

For example, he says “I find people confusing. This is for two main reasons. The first main reason is that people do a lot of talking without using any words.” (14) To us, things like facial expressions are part of everyday life, and we automatically understand them, but to Christopher, they are like the bottom of the ocean - deep, dark and unknown. He also shows us that he doesn’t understand emotions when, on page one hundred and twenty, Christopher and his father are having an emotional moment, and his father finally tells him who killed Wellington. Christopher’s father breaks it to him like this: “And he said, “I killed Wellington, Christopher.” I wondered if this was a joke, because I don’t understand jokes, and when people tell jokes they don’t mean what they say.” (120) Within the context, it’s pretty obvious that Christopher’s father has broken down and is trying to get everything off of his chest, and not trying to tell a joke. In conclusion, Christopher is not a reliable narrator because he can not read emotions, meaning that he can’t always provide an accurate look into what’s

Open Document