Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime and punishment characters by dostoyevsky
Crime and punishment characters by dostoyevsky
Crime and punishment by dostoevsky essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime and punishment characters by dostoyevsky
A famous line from the movie The Usual Suspects goes “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist”. This is exactly what Dostoevsky does in his most famous novel Crime and Punishment. Throughout the novel references to God and forgiveness abound. There is a much darker side to what Dostoevsky writes though. If you have God working in your life unfortunately you also have the devil working in your life, and this is what happens to the main character of the book, Raskolnikov. He is given many chances to do the right thing and not sin, yet the devil still provides even more temptations, and gets Raskolnikov to fall into the trap of murder. Yet God does still give you chances for forgiveness and wants you to reject your sin. The devil works in any way he can to get men to sin, but God will send a way to get you to forgive your sins and come back to him and leave the devil’s ways, and that was Dostoevsky’s main point of Crime and Punishment.
At the end of the novel Raskolnikov is sitting in a prison cell in Siberia without family, he only has a former prostitute, Sonia, at his side to keep him company. He has murdered two women because of his poverty, one is a pawnbroker and the other Lizaveta. He went days avoiding the law especially Porfry. Even though his mother, his sister Dounia, and his friend Razmuzin tried to help him through his sickness he still confessed after the daughter of Marmeledov, a former government employee whom he met at a tavern, told him to confess.
Meyer 2
His daughter happen to be Sonia who falls in love with Raskolnikov at the end of the book.
The devil starts working against Raskolnikov with a chance to sin even before the book begins. In the middle of the first part o...
... middle of paper ...
...oevsky’s character Raskolnikov in the novel Crime and Punishment. He has to go through the devil’s temptation, his opportunities to commit the sin, and the guilt the devil puts on him. Raskolnikov goes through metaphorical hell because of his guilt and is on the road to literal hell because he has no way out. Fortunately God does not let you suffer in your sin and sends a way to get you to confess. For Raskolnikov the way God sends him forgiveness is through Sonia the prostitute. Sonia provides Raskolnikov a way to r receive forgiveness for his crime. Although at first Raskolnikov is hesitant of Sonia and her attempts to get him to ask God for forgiveness, but in the end Raskolnikov accepts Christ and gets the forgiveness and peace of mind he desired and needed. Once again God shows that the devils power is no match to his own, and God will be victorious in the end.
Deep down, Raskolnikov’s motives behind his deed amount to something profound in the end, how he rejects his past and learns much from it. Santangelo’s criticism touches on the meaning of Raskolnikov’s motives, but seems incomplete in terms of the impact their resolutions have on the end of the novel and Dostoyevsky’s message. This is where the motives transform into greater meanings. How does Raskolnikov redeem himself at the end? Is there one choice that explains the action? Each of his choices alone and together are gripping because seldomly is a person’s emergence from transgression the product of a single force. All results are intertwined with unfathomable levels of choice that begin subliminally but come down to a conscious decision. Dostoyevsky had the audacity to expose the root complexity of human emotion, then show how it can consciously choose its ending, happy or unhappy. Raskolnikov’s redemption was a public, pragmatic, individual, and ideological
We see Raskolnikov as a man in extreme poverty at the opening of the book, dropping out of college, and living in a small and dirty apartment. Although he has a family who cares about him, the man hardly seems to care about anything at all. Dostoevsky explains that the poor ex-student was “...so immersed in himself and had isolated himself so much from everyone that he was afraid not only of meeting his landlady but of meeting anyone at all. He was crushed by poverty; but even his strained circumstances had lately ceased to burden him.” (quote) Raskolnikov also has major drinking issues, as he “... [tries] to find sympathy and feeling in [drinking].” (Dostoevsky, 3)) From these poor qualities of the young man’s life, Raskolnikov begins to detach and isolate himself from the rest of the society.
... himself in the service of others. Though Raskolnikov initially holds the belief that he is a higher being among others, his sense of regret and internal conflict after the murder shows otherwise. If Raskolnikov truly embodied the ubermensch as he envisioned himself to, he would show no sign of sorrow for bringing “happiness” to the rest of society, as well as providing justice for all the people Alyona Ivanovna has scammed. In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov’s sense of emotional and physiological regret works against him, and helps portray to readers his false sense of justice and self image. By using murder as a key event, Dostoevsky gives readers an opportunity to understand the protagonists’ logic and justification for killing, how the character would react in such extreme situations, and how those reactions reflect his view toward society and his own beliefs.
After killing Lizaveta, Raskolnikov feels a sense of guilt and disappointment. He begins to realize maybe he is not above society, and that he is not the great savior he believes he is. Sonia has betrayed
In Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov's initial crime, failure, and acceptance of mistakes are his road to overcoming his ego, as well as self discovery.
Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment explores the themes of guilt and the consequences of committing immoral actions. Of all the deep, thought-provoking concepts put forth in Crime and punishment, the idea that guilt can be an adequate punishment more valid than any punishment executed by society as a whole is the most far reaching and supported by the novel. Crime and Punishment follows Rodian Raskolnikov’s life from just a few days before he commits two brutal murders to when he confesses his crimes and is convicted and sentenced to several years in prison. Initially, Rodian had successfully gotten away with the murder of two people. Raskolnikov’s guilt-driven madness has given him an immunity and even investigators he confesses to think he couldn’t be guilty. As a result, his guilt continues to feed on his conscience to the point where he is constantly miserable. Raskolnikov’s true punishment is the futility of his attempt to escape the guilt of his actions without confessing and feeling adequately punished.
He is married to Katerina Ivanovna who married him after her first marriage didn’t work out. He regained his job, but lost it 5 days before. Because of this, he’s been neglecting his family. His daughter Sonya was forced into prostitution. Raskolnikov leaves a few kopecks out of pity.
...ing to compensate for them. As his guilt is almost done eating him inside and out, Raskolnikov finally admits and with a new love, he points his life in a whole new direction. Svidrigailov’s moral ambiguity seems to play a smaller part in the whole picture than Raskolnikov’s, making a subplot for the story and adding details to make it more exciting.
Although the novel begins by focusing on the crime itself, the majority of the book discusses Raskolnikov's struggle through denial and redemption after the murder has been committed. His own "greatness" leads to his denial of God, and his attempt to suppress his conscience causes insanity and sickness. However these negative consequences force him to acknowledge his rectitude and realize his need for confession.
One part of the book that faith is woven into is Raskolnikov’s faith in escaping clean handed after murdering Aliona Ivanovna and her daughter, Lizaveta, and not be affected by it whatsoever. Raskolnikov easily snuck past everyone in the apartment building, and got back home without any suspicion on his part. Once he got home, he believed that we would be safe from pointed fingers because he hid all of his evidence, and because there was no reason for anyone to accuse of him of murdering the two ladies. Although he believed he wouldn’t be caught, that didn’t stop him from reacting poorly to his previous actions. After the murder, the feeling of guilt ate at Raskolnikov to the point where he had to stay in bed, full of ailment. He had yet to be caught, which caused Raskolnikov to believe that he is on a higher level than the other average man. This is ironic, considering the quality of Raskolnikov’s life style. He called himself “extraordinary”, yet his apartment was filled with poverty and carelessness. Within the first page of the book, the audience learns of R...
Due to his murder, he had no concern or care for anyone. By killing two women and taking their lives away how could Raskolnikov possess sincere feelings for anyone? Raskolnikov’s lack of care influences how he views his family: “I hate them, I feel a physical hatred for them” (276). Raskolnikov has entirely lost love. If he has deep hatred towards those people most dear to him, then he must greatly lack love. But by Sonia’s actions, Raskolnikov is able to once again feel love. Sonia genuinely loves him. When confessing about the murder, Raskolnikov learns “how great [is] her love for him” (417). He begins to understand how Sonia feels and this realization strikes remorse in him. He becomes upset with himself because “he had made her more miserable” (420). Here Raskolnikov is concerned about Sonia. Earlier Raskolnikov had no feelings for anyone, but now he begins to regret his actions and feels bad about making her cry. Sonia’s deep love for him radiates off of herself and affects Raskolnikov which makes him feel compassion towards her. He begins to understand Sonia’s feelings and intentions even more when he returns for her cross: “ Raskolnikov at that moment felt and knew once for all that Sonia was with him forever and would follow him to the ends of the earth” (521). Raskolnikov recognizes how true and perpetual Sonia’s love and concern for him is and will be. Her love gives him hope for a bright future and thus he starts
If one takes the concept of him as two people, the entire novel/the reader’s understanding of it relies on these relationships and his own with his other half of self. The journey of Raskolnikov throughout Crime and Punishment gives forth Dostoyevsky’s ultimate plan for this piece as he intended to get across the internal chaos of men and power and their desires to seek it out. There is consistent questioning on Raskolnikov’s part- ever questioning whether or not to confess to the murders to the police or go on living and separate himself from what he had done. He was deciding whether or not to consider what he had done a crime. In the thought of his Napoleonic principles- it wasn’t. The pawnbroker did nobody good but herself- she was a parasite sucking the blood/life from the community she commanded. In the thought of his untainted self, it was murder. Plain and simple. His punishment for pursuing the idea of having an upper hand on others is to deal with the internal repercussions that cannot possibly handle the mental tug of
In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.
Before Raskolnikov confessed at the police station, Nikolai interrupted and took the blame. After Nikolai confessed Raskolnikov realized that he could not, so he took the roll of the onlooker pretending he did not know about Alyona. The officers believed Nikolia but Porfiry thought otherwise after Raskolnikov accidently nicknamed Nikolai after his dream character, Mikolka. Porfiry noted that Nikolai is “still a child and not exactly a coward, but something by way of an artist. He is innocent and responsive to influence. He has a heart, and is a fantastic fellow. He sings and dances, he tells stories,... people come from other villages to hear him. He attends school too, and laughs till he cries if you hold up a finger to him; he will drink himself senseless--not as a regular vice, but at times, when people treat him, like a child”(Dostoevsky 391) and found it strange that a man like him would commit such a crime. His reason to turn himself in was believed to be fear which “overcomes Mikolka when he learns about the murder of the old lady and feels guilty because he had picked up the earrings dropped by [ Raskolnikov in attempt of his escape]; his fear of being accused became unbearable and he wants to hang himself.” (Bem) but Porfiry hinted that it was in fact Nikolai’s religious upbringing and his moral experiences that prompted him to turn himself in to the police. Raskolnikov’s guilt is
This is not, in fact, what happens though. Rather, Raskolnikov is forced to confess by several factors including the very fear of being discovered. This fear is emphasized to illustrate his displacement from the “extraordinary” man; an “extraordinary” man would not have possessed such fears since he would know that he had a right to execute such actions .