The Bondocks Analysis

478 Words1 Page

Journal 6
Many may find comedy's dumb, or not even funny; this is usually not because the comedies aren't funny, but because the individual does not understand the kind of humor being used. In black comedies, such as The Boondocks, many may find it borderline racists and stereotypical. Although it can depicted this way, it is actually the opposite. In Roland Laird’s The Boondocks: Carrying On the Tradition of Subversive Black Comedy, Laird explains how The Boondocks is actually the opposite of what many viewers think. It uses humor to get viewers to think and understand black oppression, specifically during the Civil Rights Era. Laird argues “that this type of humor in fact cleverly subverts the status quo” (Laird, 2010, p. 2). The author makes use of examples and informed opinions to get his argument across, hoping to influence viewers to view black comedies from a different standpoint. …show more content…

Explaining a friend’s view on the show, he says, “The Boondocks perpetuates a negative imagery of black people and undermines the work of more socially conscious black artists” (Laird, 2010, p. 2). By sharing this example, Laird demonstrates another individual’s point of view. This person views it as socially inappropriate, while others portray it as insightful and humorous. Everyone’s different views allow the audience to make assumptions and criticize the show, without necessarily understanding it. The author utilizes his informed opinion on the show when explaining from personal experience, “I laugh, but it challenges me to think about the various strains of self-hatred that are present in my community” (Laird, 2010, p. 2). He challenges the views of the previous example. Laird argues that The Boondocks actually emphasizes the issues in society through comedy. It allows the audience to question and justify the message behind the

Open Document