The Birds Nat Hocken Analysis

765 Words2 Pages

What would people do during a zombie apocalypse? What about a bird apocalypse. This is what happened in the short story, “The Birds”, by Daphne du Maurier. On farm in London one day the birds start to rebel against the humans and start attacking. In “The Birds”, Nat Hocken had better survival skills compared to Mr. Trigg because in the end of the story, Mr. Trigg’s family doesn’t survive, but Nat’s does. Mr. Trigg was very offensive when it came to the birds, and Nat Was defensive. Mat Hocken wanted to protect himself by being defensive. “The blanket became a weapon of defense. He wound it about his head, and then in greater darkness beat the birds with his bare hands” (du Maurier 2). This shows how Nat had good survival skills because when he was in a bad situation and he was outnumbered by the birds, he chose to defend himself instead of going after the birds. This …show more content…

Trigg in the short story, “The Birds”, this is proved throughout the text. Nat Hocken was defensive when it came to the birds, trying to protect himself by not going after the birds helped him, compared to Mr. Trigg who was offensive, going after the birds, not doing him any good. The windows was something that they differed on, Nat spent all day trying to board up his windows, while Mr. Trigg said that it was a complete waste of time this helped Nat because the birds went straight for his windows, while ignoring the windows hurt Mr. Trigg, killing him. They had different survival skills when it came to using a gun against the birds, Nat Hocken was not for using the gun because he thought that it would be a terrible idea, while Mr. Trigg enthusiastically offered Nat a gun and had a gun himself. The skills and ideas that the men had was opposites. The opposite ideals show, for one of them survives and another dies. If a bird apocalypse happens to present itself Nat’s survival skills would certainly prove to be better than Mr.

Open Document