The Abuse Of Power In Caligula, Emperor Of Rome

1126 Words3 Pages

This piece may offend some. Near the end I express views about the danger of corruption, and eventually about how people choose to extend oppression, instead of love. I do share these views, but most approve, or at least choose to approve of both, so I’m going to add a disclaimer.

Power is having control and choosing to use it to reach your goals. Some leaders have had this, and been incredibly effective, others have chosen not to use their control, and been less effective. Oppressive, selfish leaders are considered to have more power than accepting leaders that cared for the people, rather than re-election and the opinions of fellow members of the aristocracy. Power is something which leaders seek to abuse, but citizens also use, and constantly abuse to achieve. …show more content…

Those who abused power became more and more powerful, leading to autocrats and dictators becoming tyrants. Caligula, emperor of Rome, was one of their most powerful, but lacked integrity, due to his lack of morals. He wanted to make his horse consul, and spent his days abusing his power to make the lives of his fellow aristocracy miserable. He was sadistic, enjoying to torment and embarrass the nobility. There also was another emperor, Nero, who enjoyed using his power. He hated christians, burning them with oil, eventually burning down Rome and blaming the christians for it. There also was one emperor who had both power and integrity, Constantine. Constantine began the conversion of Rome to Christianity, and began ending legal persecution of the Christians. That act took his power, and he chose to use it, although this time to better a group of people, although this doesn’t extend throughout all of Rome, and those who were pagans suffered from this, it did, for a short amount of time, lessen legal persecution throughout

Open Document