This Christmas Eve will be one that Jane will always remember, because her father David, has finally decided to buy her a cell phone. Last month was her 13th birthday and she pleaded with her father for a cell phone. Jane has always envisioned herself texting on her phone and laughing at her friends responses to her text. Her father believes that she deserves it. She has been at the top of her class and helps out a lot around the house, but with all the debate on the negative effect of texting, is David giving his daughter a weapon that will destroy her ability to write effectively and thus affect her grade in school?
I have yet to not see one of my peers walking with their eyes glued to their cell phones. They quickly type the day’s events on a tiny screen that they use almost all day, every day. Teenagers today use texting as a primary source of communication. Although texting is an efficient and quick way of communication, texting is reducing teen literacy due to lack of face to face communication, abbreviated spelling, and meaningless conversation. Teen literacy today is at a low. According to author Anne Lewis, “more than eight million students in grades 4-12 are reading at "below basic" levels” (Education Digest 51). Because of the simplicity of most ways of communication, it deprives the teens of communicating effectively. They become so used to
In today’s culture, one of the fastest ways to communicate with others is through text messages. Text messages are a form of electronic messages sent from one cell phone to another minimizing the wait time for it to be sent and received. Through time text messages have transformed into its own writing system. From the use of spelling, grammar to the unregulated space in the orthographic regime, text messages have created a distinctive linguistic identity. This texting speech also known as “SMS Langauge” has gotten linguists eager at observing what they are considering “the biggest ever language revolution” (Kumar, "A Linguistic Study Of Abbreviations In SMS"). Text messages have a lot of underlying meaning composed in its language from being its own written form to being an expression of text users. Because of the rapid popularity and addictions texting has caused, linguists are researching whether texting language affects student’s literacy when it comes to language skills.
As De Saussure Ferdinand said, “Time changes all things; there is no reason why language should escape this universal law.” Throughout the years,technology such as texting, facebook and instant messaging played a major role in the destruction of the English language. Technology in many ways has an adverse effect on the English language. Kids now days is slaughtering the english language by using improper grammar and often times don’t punctuate. Technology in many ways has an inimical effect on the English language. In the article, "I h8 txt msgs" by John Humphrys debates that texting is ruining the English language. Also in the article, “Text Messaging: Bad Spelling or Destroying the English Language?” by: JKLlewthor detects the extent to
As stated in the article, “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, people believe that texting is not a natural form of communication and that it is wrecking our language. Although some people may agree with this idea, studies have challenged this opinion. Rather than fearing the consequences of texting, people should embrace this evolution and understand that this new form of communication may actually provide benefits to literacy. This author once stated, “there is no evidence that texting teaches people to spell badly: rather, research shows that those kids who text frequently are more likely to be the most literate and the best spellers, because you have to know how to manipulate language” (David Crystal Quotes). The moral panic created by this form of socialization should be diminished, as people have the power and ability to shape our future.
These days texting is the most common means of communication; in a form that uses abbreviations to quicker the process. This is not famous way of communication between the teenagers only, text messages have gained there value in business too. It allows person to reply according to their connivence and does not make them to have to call. Too make the process of texting fast, people use language of abbreviation; “textspeak”. People argue on positive and negative affects on student’s writing skills due to such use of abbreviation. Reality is that, there is no influence on student writing due to texting.
Texting could affect the literacy skills of students. People have increasingly used abbreviation in the academic writing essay, and improper language such as LOL, thx and IDK. Abbreviation could also results in
The author notes that technology would affect the way people use their language in a matter of using abbreviations when texting. He also noted that messaging causes poor spelling and laziness when typing simple words on the phone. Teenagers have been creating abbreviated words since texting became popular; but abbreviated words have been around way before mobile phones were released. Crystal states, “people have been initializing common phrases for ages” (902), and
...look. Also, they usually do not save themselves very much time if the person they are texting does not understand the acronym. Whenever Humphrys said “I was baffled by IMGO U R GR8” (Humphrys, p 32), I thought to myself, “wow, you are very mature, in using an acronym that very few people understand in the first place, just to get your point across that you hate texting lingo.” My point is: texting and instant messaging – along with all other newer forms of communication – are not destroying the amount of writing that students are doing, and that communication also does not hinder the way that these students write.
Text messaging is extremely prevalent in today’s society and has impacted life for the current generation in a multitude of ways. The impact of texting can be hard to quantitatively determine, however it is contributing to an ongoing evolution in the way that humans communicate with each other via its effects on written language, grammar, and what purpose cell phones serve. This paper will show how texting is contributing to societal norms, a language shift and the sociological impact among youth in America and some of the reasons the changes are occurring.
After many years of evolution and the developing of human intelligence, language was created and writing had followed right after. People have been increasing their intelligence through writing, but as soon as technology made large advancements and texting was invented, society has caused a huge downfall in human intelligence. Texting is killing off writing! In the TED talk video, “Txting is Killing Language. JK!!" by John McWhorter, McWhorter discusses the ways texting has influenced the human way of life. Another article, “IS TEXT MESSAGING RUINING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE?” By Wil, the author also disputes the ways texting is ruining the youth and our language.
The way people communicate has significantly changed over the years due to technological advances. When it comes to reaching people anywhere and everywhere in the world in the quickest amount of time, nothing beats text messaging. Because of these advances in communication nothing in recent history has changed or form of writing more than texting has. According to the Pew Research “The vast majority of Americans – 95% – now own a cellphone of some kind”. As shown by these statistics texting is a more convenient way of writing to one another. Furthermore, upon a person having a cell phone on them the response time is instant, most of the time. This is another reason why texting has become the preferred method of communication, causing the
Having personal texting experience, I am able to confirm Crystal’s statement that texting can benefit the language and improve reading and writing skills. Crystal discusses diverse studies on the relations between texting and literacy in pre-teenage children. Crystal’s results revealed that “The more abbreviations in messages, the higher they scored on tests of reading and vocabulary. The children who were better at spelling and writing used the most textisms. And the younger they received their first phone, the higher their scores.” (345). His results support his outlook that texting does in fact improve literacy; he states “Children could not be good at texting if they had not already developed considerabl...
Texting, techspeak, and tweens: The relationship between text messaging and English grammar skills by Drew P. Cingel and S. Shyam Sundar (2012), is an article that discusses the connection between text messaging in adolescents and poor English grammar skills (Cingel & Sundar, 2012). Cingel started the study as a student investigating the effect of texting on grammar skills, after receiving text messages from his nieces, which were incomprehensible. (2012, July 26). Cingel combined with S. Shyam Sundar, a distinguished Professor of Communication and Co-director of the Penn State Media Effects Research Laboratory. The journal is ranked internationally and peer-reviewed, and is a seminal source that has contributed strongly to its’ field. These findings contribute significantly to the body of knowledge in terms of data and practical application. Demonstrated within this journal is a suitable methodology, a strong argument with reliable evidence, and a relevant writing style and structure.
A study by Soloman Dansieh tackles this exact problem, to see if truly texting has an impact on communication skills. There were 430 questionnaires that were filled out by 400 students and 30 lectures at Wa Polytechnic, a university. The results of this study found that “83% of [students] and 70% of lecturers in the survey admitted that SMS language [could] harm their writing skills” (Dansieh 228). In addition to this study, it has been found that overall “77% percent of adolescents own cell phones, 63% communicate via text messaging every day, and 49% send and receive text messages with friends every day” (Underwood 101). Thus, it can be inferred that texting is an unavoidable form of communication. Being aware of this, as well as the potential impact that some have discovered on language, this relates back to the fears and warnings of both Aristotle and Ong in regards to rhetoric and