Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movie Analysis: Baz Luhrmann's Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Movie Analysis: Baz Luhrmann's Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Romeo and juliet tragedy analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Techniques Used to Direct Two Film Versions of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Having watched two different film adaptations of 'Romeo and Juliet',
it is clear to see that the two directors, Baz Luhrmann and Franco
Zeffirelli, have used a number of different techniques, quite
differently at times, to put across their particular interpretations
of the play. These methods and different interpretations are very
obvious if you should study the same scene as portrayed in each film.
We looked at the introduction and the opening scene of each film to
compare the differences between them and found that the differences,
though some were more subtle than others, were obvious. Whilst Franco
Zeffirelli's adaptation uses far more traditional techniques, Baz
Luhrmann used a far more modern approach to the production of the
classic play.
Zeffirelli's film uses the original concept of the film; it sticks to
the original setting and structure of the play, keeping the
originality at a maximum. Whilst Luhrmann uses a modern concept so
that it is easier for the viewer to relate, for example, the setting
of Luhrmann's film is in America, Zeffirelli sets his interpretation
in Verona, Italy, where the original play was set. This can help the
viewer to relate to the characters and setting. Because Luhrmann
modernised the play, he also set it in the present day, again, moving
away from Shakespeare's original script which was set in the 14th
Century, the time which Zefferelli chose to set his interpretation.
Although Luhrmann modernised his version considerably, he chose to use
the language that Zefferelli used in his film, the original script of
...
... middle of paper ...
... had
expensive, valuable possessions like cars and guns whilst the Capulets
had a much more average look about them. I think this failed him in a
sense because Zeffirelli tried to show that both families were of the
same importance yet Luhrmann made it seem as though the Montagues were
in a much higher position socially.
In conclusion, the two films, although both based on Shakespeare's
Romeo and Juliet, use extremely different techniques (modernisation,
traditionalism, etc) to portray different adaptations of the play.
These effects could change the direction of the film completely; does
the end result still have the same plot as Shakespeare's original
concept? Both interpretations are unique and effective in their own
way, managing to draw the audience into their own adaptation of the
classic tragedy perfectly.
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two lovers who have to risk their lives in order to demonstrate their love and will to stay together, regardless the feud between their families. By the end, the death of Romeo and Juliet finally bring the reconciliation to these two families. It is fate that the two most shall-not meet people fall in love and it love that eventually won against hatred. Since then, there have been many different versions of Romeo and Juliet, whether it was for film, stage, musicals. These different recontextualised adaptions change the original play by many ways, some modernise the language, environment, props as well as changing the original characteristics of some characters. Out of all the different adaptions of Romeo and Juliet, two stood out the most. One was the Romeo and Juliet (1996) and directed by Baz Luhrmann and the other one was Romeo and Juliet Broadway (2013) play version,
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
such as the painted eyelashes, his shaggy hair which looked like a wig, and his
Juliet’ due to the fact that his film work was about youth and how its
‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a tragic play about two star crossed lovers written by Shakespeare in 1595. The play is a timeless teenage tradgedy. “The play champions the 16th Century belief that true love always strikes at first sight,” (Lamb 1993: Introduction) and even in modern times an audience still want to believe in such a thing as love at first sight. Act II Scene II the balcony scene displays that romantic notion perfectly.
music changes to show that she is sad. We then get a close up of
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
How Baz Luhrmann Uses Props, Iconography, Costumes, and Settings to Create His Own Version of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet William Shakespeare’s best loved tragedy, Romeo and Juliet, has been portrayed in theatres and on film in many different ways. But none have been quite like Baz Luhrmann’s imaginative and unconventional adaptation. He has brought aspects of the plays Elizabethan origins and transfused them with a modern day background and created, what can only be described as a masterpiece. I believe that his use of Props, iconography costumes and the settings he has chosen has helped him to make this film such a great success. The settings of each scene have been specifically chosen to create a desired affect.
Comparing the Opening Scenes of the Zeffirelli and Luhrmann Versions of Romeo and Juliet This essay will focus on how Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann portray the opening scenes of Romeo and Juliet. The traditional version of Romeo and Juliet was directed by Franco Zeffirelli in which Leonard Whiting played Romeo and Olivia Hussey played Juliet. This version was made in 1968 and aimed at the older audience. It was made in a way that was more accessible to the way Shakespeare wrote it. The modern version of Romeo and Juliet was directed by Baz Luhrmann.
Baz Luhrmann's Film Techniques to Make Romeo and Juliet More Accessible to a Younger Audience
One of the most celebrated plays in history, “Romeo and Juliet”, was written by William Shakespeare in the late 16th century. It is a story about two lovers that have to meet in secret because of an ongoing family feud. Tragically, because of their forbidden love Romeo and Juliet take their lives so they can be together. In 1997, a movie was adapted from the play “Romeo and Juliet”, directed by Baz Lurhmann. However, as alike as the movie and the play are, they are also relatively different.
Stereotypes create misconceptions of race. People are quick to judge and can mistaken someone for who they really are. Physical appearance can change the way people conceive who you are and categorize you in a group. Staples technique’s of changing his appearance did not really adjust the way others looked at him. Brent Staples tried to convince others that he was not who they judged him to be.
For instance, Antonio is fair, lean, and lanky and has long hair that covers his eyes. The way Antonio is built makes
Being a director in a production such as Romeo and Juliet is no easy task, and I enter into this paper with that in mind. My goals are to be creative, and do things differently from the many versions of the play we have viewed in class. Each of those directors took the original text, written by William Shakespeare, and turned it into a unique version of their own; unique in the sense that they changed the tragedy by taking out lines, conversation or even entire scenes to better suit that particular director’s needs.
He wore a pair of cream colored cargo shorts and a pair of sneakers from Wal-Mart. He was the typical sixth grader everyone could imagine. From that moment on, we have had many great and memorable times. Today, Mike’s look is very unique. Over the years, he has changed dramatically.