Symbolic Theory Of Deviance

1780 Words4 Pages

Power of Words For the past four years I have worked at my family’s company that has been in business now for 47 years. Once my grandfather hit retirement, he had passed on the ownership of the business to my father. I thoroughly enjoy working with my family, but like all jobs - the work has its pros and cons. Being that I am the owner’s daughter, my co-workers have the tendency to cast judgment upon me for receiving perks and benefits or so called “royal treatment”, that is not equally distributed upon all who are employed. For example, I am not reprimanded when arriving late to work, I receive raises in my pay check without asking for it, I don’t need to work full-time if I am not in want or need of more hours, and when it comes to vacation …show more content…

This theory was derived primarily by George Mead and assisted by Charles Cooley. Symbolic interactionism looks at the social structures amongst individuals and a group of people, rather than looking at the large-scale perspective. Symbolic interactionism unveils different meanings through objects, events, and behaviors. These meanings can differ from the interpretations people assign to certain situations, and interpretations alter from one group of people to another. Verbal conversations are words that serve as one of the primary symbols within this theory. The words have a certain meaning for the one conveying these feelings, and if the communication is successful in the process, then hopefully the meaning remains the same with the individual who receives the spoken words. Words require intentionality in order to receive the interpretation one is hoping for. Conversation is an interaction of symbols between individuals who constantly interpret the world around them. Of course, anything can serve as a symbol as long as it refers to something beyond the symbol itself. This symbolism relates to my deviant act because I verbally showed my appreciation to my co-workers by writing out sincere letters. These letters were not written with fleeting words, but were written with great intentions because I put a lot of thought behind …show more content…

In Cooley’s theory of the “looking glass self,” he argued that the way we think about ourselves is likely due to our imagination of how we appear to others. We imagine the judgment that others cast upon us. And in result, our actions reflect to these perceived judgements. When following through with this deviant act, I had led myself to believe that I appeared as a selfish and over-privileged daughter of the owner to my co-workers. My imagination, by nature, gave me the impression that the people I work with judged me. And in response to these perceived judgments, I did an act of deviance that I thought would resolve the way my co-workers viewed me. Another principle that Cooley contributed to sociology was that although our perceptions and assumptions that we make of a situation are not always true, what we believe is more important in determining our behavior of the situation than what is actually real. A sociologist, W. I. Thomas, expressed the same idea as Cooley and noted, “If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.” This quote of Thomas’s holds true to my situation because I defined the situation that I was in. I made the assumption from the very beginning that almost every in the office held a sense of anger and jealousy against me. The way I defined that situation was very real to me, but in return I had consequences with

More about Symbolic Theory Of Deviance

Open Document