Superman Red Son Literary Analysis

1545 Words4 Pages

Desire for power and demonstration of dominance has been the impetus of human history since the beginning of time. People want to conquer territory and be the very best, they want to be someone others are jealous of. In Mark Millar’s Superman: Red Son, Millar demonstrates this desire for power and the consequences of these actions. The comic takes place during the Cold War and tells the tale of what would happen if Superman had landed in the Soviet Union instead of Smallville, Kansas. The comic takes place in the Superman elseworld, where different stories or events occur to pre-existing characters, which are not related to the DC canon universe. While it is not explicitly stated in the comic, Superman demonstrates the values of the Soviet …show more content…

In Red Son, the United States economy is in shambles as their effort to rival Superman prove fruitless. Lex Luthor is given a “ludicrous” amount of money for his anti-Superman program which proves to be a failure time and time again. Each new idea of Luthor seems good in practice but is always met with a strong rebuttal from Superman. Halfway through the comic, Luthor is at attempt 307 in his attempts to beat Superman, showing the grotesque number of attempts and resources that went into Luthor’s failed program. With government spending focused on the anti-Superman program the United States becomes unruly, there are riots in California, the White House gets bombed, and Texas and Detroit talk of independence. This section of the comic relates closely with the start of the Iraq war, which started just a year before the comics release. The United States entered the war due to the possibility of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, and the massive government spending on both nuclear weapons and the war caused public uproar globally. According to the BBC, “73% of the global population disapproved of U.S. handling of the Iraq War” (BBC), which could explain this comic’s negative outlook on war and weaponry. Much like the government spending of nuclear weapons and war, the United States’ government in the comic spends a ridiculous amount into a program with minimal pay-off. Nuclear economics professor Stephen I. Schwartz believes there is a point where government spending in nuclear arms becomes superfluous in his article, “The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons”. In the article, Schwartz explains that the United States spending in nuclear arms is a way to demonstrate power, he explains that countries believe that if they have the most powerful weapons that other countries will agree to demands. Schwartz believes “at a minimum hundreds of

Open Document