Summary Of The Psych Review Paper Of John Locke

Real and illusory events and differentiating between the two was the main topic of the Psych Review Paper. There were two experiments done and there were small differences between them. The first experiment consisted of listened to a reading of the words: snore, slumber, night, tired, comfort, dark, rest, sound, bed, dream, awake, and eat. Then 5 minutes after the words were read, the subjects were given a 3 minute time limit to recall as many words from the list as possible in any order. Then the subjects were given four judgement tasks to test their confidence on if the words they recorded were words they heard in the list, to specify if they knew the word was from the list or if they remembered hearing the word from the list, if the subjects

He believed that the operations of the mind are separate from the sensory experience. To elaborate, he believed that experiencing the sensory information would cause the brain create an infinite amount of other ideas. In the second experiment, the subjects were instructed to come up with ways to remember the words for questions that would be asked about word meaning later. Looking at this from Locke’s point of view, hearing the words and then the instructions would cause the subjects’ brain to come up with idea after idea to keep the words in mind. This would also be a great example of Locke’s view on a simple idea becoming a complex idea. Locke also used primary and secondary qualities in his lexicon. A primary quality causes one to think of a physical object that is related to that work. A secondary quality causes one to think of something felt or seen by the senses. The words night, dark, bed, rest, eat, and slumber could have caused the subjects to think of physical objects that are related to those

Rationalism does not believe that only sensory experience is used to attain knowledge. It is the belief that the sensory experiences are altered and the mind is able to understand abstract ideologies. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz was a rationalist. He believed that ideas were innate, not derived from experience. That would mean that when the subjects were instructed to create ways to remember the list of words for questions later on about word meaning, their ideas wouldn’t come from the brain, they would already be there naturally. “The fact that humans possess many monads of a lower nature, and that ideas provided by our dominant monad exist only as potentialities, explains why we experience ides with varying degrees of clarity” (Hergenhahn, 2009, p. 187). Therefore according the Leibniz, the subjects in the experiments might would have a difficult time recalling the words from the list, because humans do not think clearly, have different levels of intelligence, and are connected to matter and